Comparing surgery and best treatment for recurrent glioblastoma
Official title: The RECSUR-study: Resection Versus Best Oncological Treatment for Recurrent Glioblastoma: Study Protocol for An International Multicenter Prospective Cohort Study (ENCRAM 2302)
Run by Erasmus Medical Center · NCT06283927 · Data updated 2026-11-12
This study is testing whether surgery or the best available treatment helps people with recurring glioblastoma feel better and live longer.
Quick facts
| Study type | Observational |
|---|---|
| Ages | 18 Years to 90 Years |
| Sex | All |
| Enrollment | 464 (estimated) |
| Sponsor | Erasmus Medical Center Academic / other |
| Locations | 8 sites (San Francisco, California and 7 other locations) |
| Status | Recruiting |
| Started | January 1, 2023 |
| Main results expected | January 1, 2027 |
| Study ends | January 1, 2028 |
| Registry record updated | February 28, 2024 |
| Trial ID | NCT06283927 on ClinicalTrials.gov |
Is this trial a fit for you?
✓Likely a good fit
Ideal candidates are adults aged 18 to 90 with recurrent glioblastoma suitable for resection.
✕Probably not a fit
Patients with tumors located in the cerebellum, brainstem, or midline, or those unable to provide informed consent may not benefit from this study.
A plain-English reading of the study's rules. Only the study team can confirm whether you qualify.
What this trial studies
This international, multicenter, prospective observational cohort study aims to compare the effects of tumor resection versus best oncological treatment for patients with recurrent glioblastoma. Patients will be assigned to either treatment option at a 1:1 ratio based on a tumor board decision. The study will evaluate primary endpoints such as NIHSS deterioration at 6 weeks post-surgery and overall survival, along with secondary endpoints including progression-free survival and various functional assessments. The study will utilize intraoperative mapping techniques to enhance safety during resection.
Why it matters
Potential benefit: If successful, this study could provide insights into the optimal treatment approach for recurrent glioblastoma, potentially improving patient outcomes.
How similar studies have gone: Previous studies have shown mixed results regarding the benefits of resection for recurrent glioblastoma, making this approach both relevant and necessary for further investigation.
Who can join: the full rules
Show full inclusion / exclusion criteria
Inclusion Criteria: 1. Age ≥18 years and ≤90 years 2. Tumor recurrence according to the RANO criteria of a previously diagnosed glioblastoma based on the WHO 2021 classification for glioma 3. The tumor is suitable for resection (according to neurosurgeon) 4. Written informed consent Exclusion Criteria: 1. Tumors of the cerebellum, brainstem, or midline 2. Medical reasons precluding MRI (e.g., pacemaker) 3. Inability to give written informed consent 4. Secondary high-grade glioma due to malignant transformation from low-grade glioma 5. Clinical data unavailable for the newly diagnosed setting
Where it's running
-
University of California, San Francisco
San Francisco, California, United States Recruiting -
Massachusetts General Hospital
Boston, Massachusetts, United States Recruiting -
University Hospital Leuven
Leuven, Belgium Recruiting -
University Hospital Heidelberg
Heidelberg, Germany Recruiting -
Erasmus MC
Rotterdam, South Holland, Netherlands Recruiting -
Medical Center Haaglanden
The Hague, South Holland, Netherlands Recruiting
Show 2 more locations
-
Technical University Munich
Munich, Germany Not yet recruiting -
Inselspital Universitätsspital Bern
Bern, Switzerland Not yet recruiting
Study contacts
- Principal investigator: Jasper Gerritsen, MD PhD — Erasmus Medical Center
- Study coordinator: Jasper Gerritsen, MD PhD
- Email: j.gerritsen@erasmusmc.nl
- Phone: 31107036130
Similar studies
Other studies for the same condition or treatment. Recruiting studies are listed first.
-
Resection techniques for recurrent glioblastoma
This study is testing different methods of mapping the brain during surgery for recurring glioblastoma to see which one helps patients keep their movement and speech abilities while removing as much of the tumor as possible.
-
Comparing tumor resection and biopsy for high-grade glioma patients
This study is testing whether removing a brain tumor or just taking a small sample helps older patients with high-grade gliomas live longer and feel better afterward.
-
Adding ruxolitinib to standard radiation and temozolomide for newly diagnosed glioblastoma
This trial will try whether adding the oral drug ruxolitinib to standard radiation and temozolomide helps adults newly diagnosed with glioblastoma.
-
Comparing palliative care and surgery for high-grade glioma patients
This study is testing whether palliative care or surgery helps people with high-grade glioma live longer and feel better.
-
Comparing two surgical approaches for high-grade glioma patients
This study is testing whether a more extensive surgical method for removing high-grade brain tumors helps patients live longer and feel better compared to a standard approach.
-
Infusion of Bevacizumab with Chemotherapy and Radiation for Newly Diagnosed Glioblastoma
This study is testing if adding a special infusion of Bevacizumab to standard chemotherapy and radiation can help people with newly diagnosed glioblastoma live longer and feel better.
How to take part
- Review the eligibility criteria above with your treating physician.
- Check the official listing on ClinicalTrials.gov for the latest contact details and recruitment status.
- Contact the study coordinator or principal investigator to ask for pre-screening. Pre-screening is free and never obligates you to enroll.