Clinical trial Recruiting at 2 sites Interventional Ages 18 to 99

Comparing different flexibility rods for treating degenerative lumbar spine diseases

Official title: Mid- or High-flex Rods Versus Low-flex Rods of SpineShape System IV for Treatment of Degenerative Lumbar Spine Diseases - a Prospective, Multicenter, Randomized Controlled Non-inferiority Study

Run by SpineSave AG · NCT06320899 · Data updated 2026-11-12

This study is testing whether different types of flexibility rods can help people with degenerative lumbar spine issues feel less back pain and improve their functionality over time.

Quick facts

Study typeInterventional
Ages18 Years to 99 Years
SexAll
Enrollment126 (estimated)
SponsorSpineSave AG
Industry-sponsored
Locations2 sites (Aarberg and 1 other locations)
StatusRecruiting
StartedJune 4, 2024
Main results expectedAugust 31, 2031
Study endsAugust 31, 2031
Registry record updatedJune 25, 2024
Trial IDNCT06320899 on ClinicalTrials.gov

Is this trial a fit for you?

Likely a good fit

Ideal candidates for this study are individuals experiencing degenerative symptoms in 1 to 2 segments of the lumbar spine, specifically between L1 and S1.

Probably not a fit

Patients with severe anatomical deformities or conditions that prevent the anchoring of the implant, or those with advanced spondylolisthesis, are unlikely to benefit from this study.

A plain-English reading of the study's rules. Only the study team can confirm whether you qualify.

What this trial studies

This multi-center, randomized clinical study aims to evaluate the effectiveness and safety of high- or mid-flex rods compared to low-flex rods in treating degenerative lumbar spine conditions. A total of 126 participants with degenerative symptoms affecting 1 to 2 segments of the lumbar spine will be recruited and randomly assigned to receive one of three types of rods: elastic, medium, or stiff. The primary outcome will be the reduction in back pain, while secondary outcomes will assess functionality over a period of up to five years through follow-up questionnaires.

Why it matters

Potential benefit: If successful, this study could provide patients with a more effective treatment option for degenerative lumbar spine diseases, potentially leading to better pain management and improved functionality.

How similar studies have gone: While dynamic stabilization systems are not new, this specific comparison of rod flexibility in treating lumbar spine diseases is a novel approach.

Who can join: the full rules

Show full inclusion / exclusion criteria
Inclusion Criteria:

* degenerative symptoms in 1 to 2 segments in the lumbar spine L1-S1
* signed informed consent of participant
* confirmation of the participant that the attendance of follow-up visits are intended
* Body-Mass-Index \< 32
* Pedicle screw axis distance \< 30mm
* one or more of the following indications:

  * (dynamic) stenosis in the spinal canal
  * neuroforaminal stenosis
  * facet joint syndrome / spondylarthrosis
  * discopathy (recurrent disc hernia)
  * degenerative spondylolisthesis (Meyerding \<1)
  * instability (hypermobility with antelishtesis, hypomobility with retrolisthesis if decompressed)

Exclusion Criteria:

* missing bone structure, e.g. due to congenital anomalies or sever anatomical deformities that make anchoring of the implant impossible
* damaged structural tissue, e.g. due to a bone fracture
* application to the thoracic or cervical spine
* pronounced idiopathic scoliosis
* spondylolisthesis \> Meyerding grad 1
* isthmic spondolylysis
* bone tumor
* osteochondrosis modic type I, II or III
* osteoporosis, which could impair screw anchoring
* history with third party implants
* patients with an active local or systemic infection
* known allergy to titatnium alloys
* skeleton in growth (epiphyseal joints not closed)
* severe muscular neuronal or vascular disease
* immunosuppresive therapy
* long-term therapy with cortisone
* heavy smokers (regular consumption of more than six cigarettes per day), drug addicts and alcoholics
* chronic pain patients
* incapable of judgment or emergency situation
* implantation during pregnancy

Where it's running

  • Spital Aarberg
    Aarberg, Switzerland
    Recruiting
  • Hirslanden Klinik Linde
    Biel, Switzerland
    Recruiting

Study contacts

Similar studies

Other studies for the same condition or treatment. Recruiting studies are listed first.

How to take part

  1. Review the eligibility criteria above with your treating physician.
  2. Check the official listing on ClinicalTrials.gov for the latest contact details and recruitment status.
  3. Contact the study coordinator or principal investigator to ask for pre-screening. Pre-screening is free and never obligates you to enroll.
Last reviewed 2026-11-14 by the Find a Trial editorial team. Information on this page is for educational purposes and is not medical advice. Always consult qualified healthcare professionals about clinical trial participation.