Combined pelvic floor retraining and hypopressive exercises for uterine prolapse outcomes
Official title: Combined Effects of Pelvic Floor Functional Movement Retraining and Hypopressive Exercises on Pain, Urogynecological Symptoms, and Quality of Life in Uterine Prolapse
Run by Riphah International University · NCT07642180 · Data updated 2026-11-12
This study tests whether adding Hypopressive Exercises to Pelvic Floor Functional Movement Retraining helps improve pain, urinary symptoms, and quality of life for women with stage I-II uterine prolapse.
Quick facts
| Study type | Interventional |
|---|---|
| Ages | 30 Years to 60 Years |
| Sex | Women only |
| Enrollment | 32 (estimated) |
| Sponsor | Riphah International University Academic / other |
| Locations | 1 site (Lahore, Punjab Province) |
| Status | Recruiting |
| Started | April 2, 2025 |
| Main results expected | June 2, 2026 |
| Study ends | August 15, 2026 |
| Registry record updated | June 11, 2026 |
| Trial ID | NCT07642180 on ClinicalTrials.gov |
Is this trial a fit for you?
✓Likely a good fit
Women aged 30-60 with stage I-II uterine prolapse who have had vaginal delivery and have at least one birth, and who are not recently pregnant or postpartum within 6 months.
✕Probably not a fit
Patients with more advanced prolapse (stage III-IV) or recent pelvic surgery within 6 months may not benefit from this specific regimen.
A plain-English reading of the study's rules. Only the study team can confirm whether you qualify.
What this trial studies
In this randomized clinical trial, 32 women aged 30-60 with stage I-II uterine prolapse at Ganga Ram Hospital, Lahore, will receive an 8-week program combining Hypopressive Exercises with Pelvic Floor Functional Movement Retraining. The study compares the combined approach to each individual intervention to see which provides greater relief of urogynecological symptoms and better quality of life. Outcome measures focus on pain, urinary symptoms, and patient-reported quality of life. Participants are allocated using non-probability convenience sampling and will be supervised during the sessions. The trial aims to determine if the combination offers superior benefits when both approaches are used together.
Why it matters
Potential benefit: If successful, this combined approach could offer greater symptom relief and quality-of-life improvements for women with uterine prolapse.
How similar studies have gone: Previous studies have explored pelvic floor training and hypopressive methods separately; evidence for the combination is limited, making this a relatively novel approach.
Who can join: the full rules
Show full inclusion / exclusion criteria
Inclusion Criteria: * Females aged 30-60 years. * Diagnosed with stage I and II uterine prolapse. * women with ≥1 parity * women who have had a vaginal delivery Exclusion Criteria: * Recent pelvic surgery (\<6 months). * Pregnancy or postpartum within 6 months. * Neurological conditions affecting muscle control. * Participation in pelvic floor rehab in the past 6 months.
Where it's running
-
Ganga Ram Hospital
Lahore, Punjab Province, Pakistan Recruiting
Study contacts
- Principal investigator: Zunaira Bilal — Riphah International University
- Study coordinator: Imran Amjad, PHD*
- Email: imran.amjad@riphah.edu.pk
- Phone: 03324390125
Similar studies
Other studies for the same condition or treatment. Recruiting studies are listed first.
-
Deep muscle relaxation and a low-residue diet to improve the surgical view during vNOTES hysterectomy
This trial tests whether a preoperative low-residue diet and deeper muscle relaxation help doctors see better during a vaginally performed hysterectomy for benign conditions.
-
Comparing the Manchester procedure versus vaginal hysterectomy for uterine prolapse
This study tests whether the Manchester procedure or vaginal hysterectomy works better for women with symptomatic uterine prolapse over a two-year follow-up.
-
Fibrin clot structure and thrombin production after urogynecological surgery
This project will test whether blood fibrin clot properties and thrombin generation change in women after surgery for uterine prolapse or urinary incontinence.
-
Comparing two types of sutures for vaginal cuff closure in laparoscopic hysterectomy
This study is testing whether a new type of suture can close the vaginal cuff faster than a standard suture for women having laparoscopic hysterectomy, without causing more complications.
-
Comparing two surgical methods for pelvic organ prolapse treatment
This study is testing two different surgical methods to see which one works better and is safer for women with pelvic organ prolapse who need surgery.
-
Vaginal versus robotic-assisted abdominal mesh repair for apical prolapse
This study will test whether vaginal mesh repair works as well and is as safe as robotic-assisted abdominal mesh repair for women with stage II or higher apical pelvic organ prolapse.
How to take part
- Review the eligibility criteria above with your treating physician.
- Check the official listing on ClinicalTrials.gov for the latest contact details and recruitment status.
- Contact the study coordinator or principal investigator to ask for pre-screening. Pre-screening is free and never obligates you to enroll.