Clinical trial Recruiting at 6 sites Interventional Ages 18 to 100 Women only

Comparing the Manchester procedure versus vaginal hysterectomy for uterine prolapse

Official title: Manchester Procedure Versus Vaginal Hysterectomy for Women With Uterine Prolapse: A Multi-Center Randomized Controlled Study (The Fin-UP Trial)

Run by Tampere University Hospital · NCT07566949 · Data updated 2026-11-12

This study tests whether the Manchester procedure or vaginal hysterectomy works better for women with symptomatic uterine prolapse over a two-year follow-up.

More Pelvic Organ Prolapse (POP) trials

Quick facts

Study typeInterventional
Ages18 Years to 100 Years
SexWomen only
Enrollment426 (estimated)
SponsorTampere University Hospital
Academic / other
Locations6 sites (Helsinki and 5 other locations)
StatusRecruiting
StartedMay 2026
Main results expectedDecember 2033
Study endsDecember 2041
Registry record updatedMay 11, 2026
Trial IDNCT07566949 on ClinicalTrials.gov

Is this trial a fit for you?

Likely a good fit

Women over 18 with symptomatic pelvic organ prolapse stage 2 or higher (uterine descent meeting POP‑Q criteria), fit for elective vaginal surgery, and with no prior POP surgery are the ideal candidates.

Probably not a fit

Women planning future pregnancy, those with active or suspected uterine/cervical malignancy, abnormal uterine bleeding, or other contraindications to uterine preservation or vaginal surgery are unlikely to be eligible or to benefit.

A plain-English reading of the study's rules. Only the study team can confirm whether you qualify.

What this trial studies

The Fin-UP trial randomly assigns women with symptomatic uterine prolapse to either the uterus-preserving Manchester procedure or to vaginal hysterectomy with apical suspension in a 1:1 parallel-group design. The primary outcome is a composite success measure at follow-up (no prolapse beyond the hymen, no bulge symptoms, and no retreatment). Secondary outcomes include anatomical results, pelvic floor symptoms, quality of life, sexual function, satisfaction, perioperative parameters, and adverse events. A total of 426 participants will be followed at 1, 2, 5, and 10 years to capture both short- and long-term outcomes.

Why it matters

Potential benefit: If successful, the Manchester procedure could provide a uterus-preserving, less invasive option with similar or better long-term success and faster recovery compared with vaginal hysterectomy.

How similar studies have gone: Existing observational studies suggest short-term advantages for the Manchester procedure, but randomized and long-term comparative evidence is limited.

Who can join: the full rules

Show full inclusion / exclusion criteria
Inclusion Criteria:

* Fit for elective vaginal surgery according to standard preoperative assessment
* Women aged over 18 years
* No previous POP surgery
* Symptomatic POP stage 2 or higher, with uterine descent of at least stage 2 (POP-Q point C ≥ minus 1) and with POP-Q point D ≤ minus 1. Patients with concurrent anterior or posterior compartment defects will be included.

Exclusion Criteria:

* Pregnancy or future plans of pregnancy
* Active malignancy of any kind
* Contraindications for uterine preservation, i.e. suspected cervical or uterine malignancy, abnormal cervical cytology, abnormal uterine bleeding, a history of endometrial hyperplasia with atypia, or a known hereditary cancer syndrome involving the uterus (e.g., Lynch syndrome). All patients will undergo a clinical examination and ultrasound assessment prior to recruitment. If clinically indicated, a Pap-smear and/or endometrial biopsy will be performed prior to inclusion.
* Contraindication to vaginal hysterectomy (e.g. extensive intra-abdominal adhesions)
* Patient's preference for uterine removal or preservation
* Planned concomitant incontinence procedure
* Inability to speak Finnish or Swedish, understand the purpose of the study, or commit to follow-up

Where it's running

  • Helsinki University Hospital
    Helsinki, Finland
    Recruiting
  • Hospital Nova, The Wellbeing Services County of Central Finland
    Jyväskylä, Finland
    Recruiting
  • Kuopio University Hospital
    Kuopio, Finland
    Recruiting
  • Oulu University Hospital
    Oulu, Finland
    Recruiting
  • Tampere University Hospital
    Tampere, Finland
    Recruiting
  • Turku University Hospital
    Turku, Finland
    Recruiting

Study contacts

Similar studies

Other studies for the same condition or treatment. Recruiting studies are listed first.

How to take part

  1. Review the eligibility criteria above with your treating physician.
  2. Check the official listing on ClinicalTrials.gov for the latest contact details and recruitment status.
  3. Contact the study coordinator or principal investigator to ask for pre-screening. Pre-screening is free and never obligates you to enroll.
Last reviewed 2026-11-14 by the Find a Trial editorial team. Information on this page is for educational purposes and is not medical advice. Always consult qualified healthcare professionals about clinical trial participation.