Bowen technique versus dynamic soft tissue mobilization for adhesive capsulitis (frozen shoulder)
Official title: Bowen Technique Versus Dynamic Soft Tissue Mobilization on Pain, Range of Motion and Functional Disability in Patients With Adhesive Capsulitis
Run by University of Lahore · NCT07047846 · Data updated 2026-11-12
This trial will test whether adding Bowen technique or dynamic soft tissue mobilization to routine physical therapy helps reduce pain and improve shoulder movement in diabetic adults aged 50–80 with adhesive capsulitis.
Quick facts
| Study type | Interventional |
|---|---|
| Ages | 50 Years to 80 Years |
| Sex | All |
| Enrollment | 72 (estimated) |
| Sponsor | University of Lahore Academic / other |
| Locations | 1 site (Lahore, Punjab Province) |
| Status | Recruiting |
| Started | July 16, 2025 |
| Main results expected | September 10, 2025 |
| Study ends | January 3, 2026 |
| Registry record updated | July 2, 2025 |
| Trial ID | NCT07047846 on ClinicalTrials.gov |
Is this trial a fit for you?
✓Likely a good fit
Adults with diabetes aged 50–80 diagnosed with Grade 2 or 3 adhesive capsulitis who are willing to attend twice-weekly in-person therapy sessions and have no recent shoulder surgery or recent steroid injections.
✕Probably not a fit
Patients with rotator cuff tears, recent shoulder surgery, arthritis, fractures, neurological disorders, recent steroid injections (within 3 months), or those who are not diabetic are excluded and unlikely to benefit from these specific study interventions.
A plain-English reading of the study's rules. Only the study team can confirm whether you qualify.
What this trial studies
This randomized, single-blind trial will enroll 72 diabetic patients aged 50–80 with Grade 2 or 3 adhesive capsulitis at the UOL Teaching Hospital. Participants will be randomly assigned to receive routine physiotherapy plus either Bowen technique or dynamic soft tissue mobilization, delivered as a total of 12 treatment sessions over six weeks (twice weekly). Outcomes measured at baseline, week 3, and week 6 include pain (VAS and SPADI Pain), shoulder range of motion (flexion, abduction, external rotation), and functional impairment (SPADI Disability and Total Score). The assessor will be blinded to group allocation to reduce measurement bias.
Why it matters
Potential benefit: If successful, it could offer a non-drug manual therapy option that reduces pain and improves shoulder range of motion and function for diabetic patients with frozen shoulder.
How similar studies have gone: Prior trials of manual therapies and soft tissue mobilization have shown modest benefit for adhesive capsulitis, while evidence for Bowen technique is limited and mixed and remains less well established in rigorous randomized trials.
Who can join: the full rules
Show full inclusion / exclusion criteria
Inclusion Criteria: * Diagnosed patients of 50-80 years of age * Grade 2 \& 3 (frozen and thawing) adhesive capsulitis * patients willing to participate in the study * Only diabetic patients Exclusion Criteria: * Major mental health probleme * Patients who has a history of surgery on the shoulder, other shoulder diseases including a rotator cuff tear, sub acromial impingement syndrome, and a shoulder labral tear * Patients taking oral or intra-articular steroids and cortisone injection prior 3 months * Subjects with rotator cuff tears or other shoulder ligament injuries, H/O arthritis related to shoulder, malignancy, adhesive capsulitis secondary to fractures, dislocation, reflex sympathetic dystrophy, neurological disorder
Where it's running
-
UOL Teaching Hospital
Lahore, Punjab Province, Pakistan Recruiting
Study contacts
- Study coordinator: Dr farrukh Murtaza Physical Therapist, Phd (PT)*
- Email: Farrukh.murtaza@uipt.uol.edu.pk
- Phone: +923339970563
Similar studies
Other studies for the same condition or treatment. Recruiting studies are listed first.
-
Niel-Asher Technique vs Bowen Technique for Frozen Shoulder
This trial tests whether two manual therapy methods differ in reducing shoulder pain and improving motion for people with frozen shoulder aged 40–60.
-
Maitland mobilization with and without stroking release for frozen shoulder
This trial tests whether adding a stroking release technique to Maitland mobilization helps people aged 40–60 with stage 2–3 frozen shoulder improve shoulder movement and reduce pain.
-
Additional effects of thoracic mobilization versus manipulation with standard physical therapy in adhesive capsulitis
This study tests whether adding thoracic manipulation or thoracic mobilization to standard physical therapy helps people with adhesive capsulitis (frozen shoulder).
-
Spinal and Kaltenborn mobilization for a stiff shoulder (frozen shoulder)
A randomized trial tests spinal mobilization with arm movement and Kaltenborn mobilization to see if they reduce pain and improve motion and function in people with adhesive capsulitis.
-
Shoulder Frozen Shoulder: TAME vs Corticosteroid Injection
This study tests whether transcatheter arterial microembolization (TAME) works better than corticosteroid injections for people with frozen shoulder.
-
Gong's Mobilization With and Without Niel-Asher Technique for Frozen Shoulder
This trial tests whether Gong's mobilization alone or with the Niel-Asher trigger-point technique can ease pain, improve shoulder movement, and reduce disability in adults with adhesive capsulitis.
How to take part
- Review the eligibility criteria above with your treating physician.
- Check the official listing on ClinicalTrials.gov for the latest contact details and recruitment status.
- Contact the study coordinator or principal investigator to ask for pre-screening. Pre-screening is free and never obligates you to enroll.