Additional effects of thoracic mobilization versus manipulation with standard physical therapy in adhesive capsulitis
Official title: Additional Effects of Thoracic Mobilization Versus Manipulation Along With Standard Physical Therapy in Adhesive Capsulitis
Run by Foundation University Islamabad · NCT07838610 · Data updated 2026-11-12
This study tests whether adding thoracic manipulation or thoracic mobilization to standard physical therapy helps people with adhesive capsulitis (frozen shoulder).
Quick facts
| Study type | Interventional |
|---|---|
| Ages | 40 Years to 60 Years |
| Sex | All |
| Enrollment | 38 (estimated) |
| Sponsor | Foundation University Islamabad Academic / other |
| Locations | 1 site (Islamabad, Punjab Province) |
| Status | Recruiting |
| Started | February 12, 2026 |
| Main results expected | December 18, 2026 |
| Study ends | January 18, 2027 |
| Registry record updated | September 24, 2026 |
| Trial ID | NCT07838610 on ClinicalTrials.gov |
Is this trial a fit for you?
✓Likely a good fit
Adults aged 40–60 with unilateral or bilateral adhesive capsulitis lasting at least 3 months and reduced shoulder ROM (>50% from baseline).
✕Probably not a fit
Patients with prior shoulder fracture, surgery, dislocation, systemic diseases, or certain neurological or cardiovascular conditions may not benefit.
A plain-English reading of the study's rules. Only the study team can confirm whether you qualify.
What this trial studies
Participants with shoulder stiffness due to adhesive capsulitis are assigned to two groups and receive standard physical therapy plus one of two thoracic interventions over four weeks. One group gets thoracic manipulation at the T1-T7 segment with a controlled thrust, while the other receives central thoracic mobilization in the prone position for 30 repetitions. The protocol includes PAIVM-directed targeting, pre-treatment thermal therapy, and a progressive regression of stretching and strengthening exercises for shoulder and scapular muscles. Outcome assessments focus on range of motion and symptom changes to see which thoracic approach yields better improvements.
Why it matters
Potential benefit: If successful, adding the chosen thoracic technique could improve shoulder mobility and reduce pain for people with adhesive capsulitis.
How similar studies have gone: Previous work on thoracic interventions for shoulder–neck conditions has shown mixed results; this study addresses a specific comparison in adhesive capsulitis.
Who can join: the full rules
Show full inclusion / exclusion criteria
Inclusion Criteria * Age range between 40 and 60 years. * Both male and female patients with unilateral or bilateral shoulder pain. * Pain persisting for at least 3 months. * Decreased shoulder ROM, including external rotation, abduction, internal rotation, and flexion, with both active and passive ROM reduced by more than 50%. * Clinically diagnosed with Stage 2 or Stage 3 adhesive capsulitis. Exclusion Criteria * History of fracture, surgery, or dislocation in the affected shoulder. * Shoulder pain resulting from systemic diseases such as rheumatoid arthritis, infection, or tumors, or conditions such as myelopathy (positive Hoffman's sign). * Neurological conditions such as stroke or cervical radiculopathy (positive Spurling's test). * Thoracic Outlet Syndrome (positive Roos test). * Uncontrolled hypertension or cardiac instability, including unstable angina, recent myocardial infarction, or other cardiovascular conditions.
Where it's running
-
Foundation University College of Physical Therapy
Islamabad, Punjab Province, Pakistan Recruiting
Study contacts
- Study coordinator: Tehmina Tabassum, DPT
- Email: tabassumbhatti12143455@gmail.com
- Phone: 03058520660
Similar studies
Other studies for the same condition or treatment. Recruiting studies are listed first.
-
Niel-Asher Technique vs Bowen Technique for Frozen Shoulder
This trial tests whether two manual therapy methods differ in reducing shoulder pain and improving motion for people with frozen shoulder aged 40–60.
-
Maitland mobilization with and without stroking release for frozen shoulder
This trial tests whether adding a stroking release technique to Maitland mobilization helps people aged 40–60 with stage 2–3 frozen shoulder improve shoulder movement and reduce pain.
-
Spinal and Kaltenborn mobilization for a stiff shoulder (frozen shoulder)
A randomized trial tests spinal mobilization with arm movement and Kaltenborn mobilization to see if they reduce pain and improve motion and function in people with adhesive capsulitis.
-
Shoulder Frozen Shoulder: TAME vs Corticosteroid Injection
This study tests whether transcatheter arterial microembolization (TAME) works better than corticosteroid injections for people with frozen shoulder.
-
Gong's Mobilization With and Without Niel-Asher Technique for Frozen Shoulder
This trial tests whether Gong's mobilization alone or with the Niel-Asher trigger-point technique can ease pain, improve shoulder movement, and reduce disability in adults with adhesive capsulitis.
-
Latissimus dorsi release added to scapular PNF for adhesive capsulitis
This trial tests whether adding latissimus dorsi myofascial release to scapular PNF helps reduce pain and improve motion and function in people with stage II frozen shoulder.
How to take part
- Review the eligibility criteria above with your treating physician.
- Check the official listing on ClinicalTrials.gov for the latest contact details and recruitment status.
- Contact the study coordinator or principal investigator to ask for pre-screening. Pre-screening is free and never obligates you to enroll.