Gong's Mobilization With and Without Niel-Asher Technique for Frozen Shoulder
Official title: Effects of Gong's Mobilization With and Without Niel Asher Technique on Shoulder Pain, Range of Motion and Disability in Adhesive Capsulitis
Run by Riphah International University · NCT07628335 · Data updated 2026-11-12
This trial tests whether Gong's mobilization alone or with the Niel-Asher trigger-point technique can ease pain, improve shoulder movement, and reduce disability in adults with adhesive capsulitis.
Quick facts
| Study type | Interventional |
|---|---|
| Ages | 40 Years to 60 Years |
| Sex | All |
| Enrollment | 46 (estimated) |
| Sponsor | Riphah International University Academic / other |
| Locations | 1 site (Lahore, Punjab Province) |
| Status | Recruiting |
| Started | December 15, 2025 |
| Main results expected | June 15, 2026 |
| Study ends | July 15, 2026 |
| Registry record updated | June 5, 2026 |
| Trial ID | NCT07628335 on ClinicalTrials.gov |
Is this trial a fit for you?
✓Likely a good fit
Adults aged 40-60 with stage II–III adhesive capsulitis and a positive capsular pattern who have at least 25% ROM loss in two planes.
✕Probably not a fit
Patients with rotator cuff tears, inflammatory diseases, malignancies, or recent corticosteroid injections may not benefit from these interventions.
A plain-English reading of the study's rules. Only the study team can confirm whether you qualify.
What this trial studies
This randomized clinical trial compares Gong's mobilization alone to Gong's mobilization combined with the Niel-Asher technique in adults aged 40-60 with stage II–III adhesive capsulitis. The study aims to measure changes in shoulder pain, range of motion, and functional disability. Participants will receive one of the two intervention strategies at a single center in Lahore, Pakistan, and outcomes will be assessed over a defined follow-up period. The trial includes adults with a positive capsular pattern and substantial ROM loss, while excluding those with rotator cuff tears, inflammatory diseases, or recent corticosteroid exposure. The findings could clarify whether adding the Niel-Asher technique provides additional benefit over Gong's mobilization alone.
Why it matters
Potential benefit: If successful, patients may experience greater pain relief and improved shoulder mobility with a combined approach.
How similar studies have gone: Previous studies suggest joint mobilization can help adhesive capsulitis, but this exact combination of Gong's mobilization with/without Niel-Asher is novel.
Who can join: the full rules
Show full inclusion / exclusion criteria
Inclusion Criteria: * Individuals with age group of 40-60 years. * Both Females and males individuals. * Individuals diagnosed with Frozen shoulder (Adhesive Capsulitis) within stage II and III of frozen shoulder. * Individuals with positive capsular pattern (ER\>Abd\> IR). * Individuals with ROM loss ≥ 25% in at least two planes compared with the noninvolved shoulder Exclusion Criteria: * Individuals with rotator cuff tears and overuse injury * Individuals with inflammatory diseases (Osteoarthritis, Rheumatoid Arthritis, Gout) and Malignancies * Individuals Using Corticosteroid Injections or Medications
Where it's running
-
Rabiya Noor
Lahore, Punjab Province, Pakistan Recruiting
Study contacts
- Principal investigator: summaya asim, MSPT(CP) — Riphah International University
- Study coordinator: Rabiya Noor, phd
- Email: Rabiya.Noor@riphah.edu.pk
- Phone: 03344355660
Similar studies
Other studies for the same condition or treatment. Recruiting studies are listed first.
-
Niel-Asher Technique vs Bowen Technique for Frozen Shoulder
This trial tests whether two manual therapy methods differ in reducing shoulder pain and improving motion for people with frozen shoulder aged 40–60.
-
Maitland mobilization with and without stroking release for frozen shoulder
This trial tests whether adding a stroking release technique to Maitland mobilization helps people aged 40–60 with stage 2–3 frozen shoulder improve shoulder movement and reduce pain.
-
Additional effects of thoracic mobilization versus manipulation with standard physical therapy in adhesive capsulitis
This study tests whether adding thoracic manipulation or thoracic mobilization to standard physical therapy helps people with adhesive capsulitis (frozen shoulder).
-
Spinal and Kaltenborn mobilization for a stiff shoulder (frozen shoulder)
A randomized trial tests spinal mobilization with arm movement and Kaltenborn mobilization to see if they reduce pain and improve motion and function in people with adhesive capsulitis.
-
Shoulder Frozen Shoulder: TAME vs Corticosteroid Injection
This study tests whether transcatheter arterial microembolization (TAME) works better than corticosteroid injections for people with frozen shoulder.
-
Latissimus dorsi release added to scapular PNF for adhesive capsulitis
This trial tests whether adding latissimus dorsi myofascial release to scapular PNF helps reduce pain and improve motion and function in people with stage II frozen shoulder.
How to take part
- Review the eligibility criteria above with your treating physician.
- Check the official listing on ClinicalTrials.gov for the latest contact details and recruitment status.
- Contact the study coordinator or principal investigator to ask for pre-screening. Pre-screening is free and never obligates you to enroll.