Niel-Asher Technique vs Bowen Technique for Frozen Shoulder
Official title: Comparative Effects of Niel Asher Technique and Bowen Technique on Pain, Range of Motion and Functional Disability in Patients With Adhesive Capsulitis.
Run by Foundation University Islamabad · NCT07856173 · Data updated 2026-11-12
This trial tests whether two manual therapy methods differ in reducing shoulder pain and improving motion for people with frozen shoulder aged 40–60.
Quick facts
| Study type | Interventional |
|---|---|
| Ages | 40 Years to 60 Years |
| Sex | All |
| Enrollment | 54 (estimated) |
| Sponsor | Foundation University Islamabad Academic / other |
| Locations | 1 site (Islamabad, Punjab Province) |
| Status | Recruiting |
| Started | February 12, 2026 |
| Main results expected | December 18, 2026 |
| Study ends | December 18, 2027 |
| Registry record updated | October 2, 2026 |
| Trial ID | NCT07856173 on ClinicalTrials.gov |
Is this trial a fit for you?
✓Likely a good fit
Adults aged 40–60 with unilateral stage II adhesive capsulitis (frozen shoulder) and 6+ months of symptoms, without recent shoulder surgery or corticosteroid therapy in the last 3 months.
✕Probably not a fit
People outside the age range, with non-frozen stage disease, or with certain exclusion conditions may not benefit.
A plain-English reading of the study's rules. Only the study team can confirm whether you qualify.
What this trial studies
This randomized, single-blind study compares the Niel-Asher Technique with the Bowen Technique to treat adhesive capsulitis in adults aged 40–60. Fifty-four participants with stage II frozen shoulder are randomly assigned to one of the two manual therapy approaches and will receive treatment over a one-year period at Foundation University Islamabad. Outcomes focus on pain, range of motion, and functional disability to determine which technique offers greater relief and functional benefit. The trial excludes recent corticosteroid use, prior shoulder surgery, and certain medical conditions that could confound results. The study adds to the evidence base for conservative management of adhesive capsulitis by directly comparing two non-pharmacological interventions.
Why it matters
Potential benefit: If successful, participants may experience reduced pain and improved shoulder motion and daily function.
How similar studies have gone: Prior studies have explored manual therapies for adhesive capsulitis, with mixed but generally positive signals for pain and ROM improvements using similar conservative approaches.
Who can join: the full rules
Show full inclusion / exclusion criteria
Inclusion criteria: The participants with following criteria will be included in the study: * Diagnosed case of unilateral primary or idiopathic Adhesive Capsulitis. * Age ranging from 40-60 years. * Frozen stage (Stage II). * Having pain and restricted active and passive range of motion \>6 months. * Capsular pattern of motion restriction (external rotation, abduction, internal rotation and flexion). * Moderate (4-6) pain intensity on NPRS * Both genders will be included. Exclusion criteria: The participants with following criteria will be excluded in the study: * Local corticosteroid injection to the affected shoulder within the last three months or who were on current corticosteroid therapy. * Any recent shoulder surgery. * Patients with neurological disorders, such as stroke, as well as those with uncontrolled diabetes, rheumatic disease in the shoulder, malignant tumors. * A history of the fracture or subluxation in the affected shoulder, history of surgery to the injured shoulder.
Where it's running
-
Foundation University College of Physical Therapy
Islamabad, Punjab Province, Pakistan Recruiting
Study contacts
- Study coordinator: Adeeba Ali, DPT
- Email: muneebaalipt@gmail.com
- Phone: 03310000956
Similar studies
Other studies for the same condition or treatment. Recruiting studies are listed first.
-
Maitland mobilization with and without stroking release for frozen shoulder
This trial tests whether adding a stroking release technique to Maitland mobilization helps people aged 40–60 with stage 2–3 frozen shoulder improve shoulder movement and reduce pain.
-
Additional effects of thoracic mobilization versus manipulation with standard physical therapy in adhesive capsulitis
This study tests whether adding thoracic manipulation or thoracic mobilization to standard physical therapy helps people with adhesive capsulitis (frozen shoulder).
-
Spinal and Kaltenborn mobilization for a stiff shoulder (frozen shoulder)
A randomized trial tests spinal mobilization with arm movement and Kaltenborn mobilization to see if they reduce pain and improve motion and function in people with adhesive capsulitis.
-
Shoulder Frozen Shoulder: TAME vs Corticosteroid Injection
This study tests whether transcatheter arterial microembolization (TAME) works better than corticosteroid injections for people with frozen shoulder.
-
Gong's Mobilization With and Without Niel-Asher Technique for Frozen Shoulder
This trial tests whether Gong's mobilization alone or with the Niel-Asher trigger-point technique can ease pain, improve shoulder movement, and reduce disability in adults with adhesive capsulitis.
-
Latissimus dorsi release added to scapular PNF for adhesive capsulitis
This trial tests whether adding latissimus dorsi myofascial release to scapular PNF helps reduce pain and improve motion and function in people with stage II frozen shoulder.
How to take part
- Review the eligibility criteria above with your treating physician.
- Check the official listing on ClinicalTrials.gov for the latest contact details and recruitment status.
- Contact the study coordinator or principal investigator to ask for pre-screening. Pre-screening is free and never obligates you to enroll.