Clinical trial Recruiting at 1 site Interventional Ages 40 to 60

Niel-Asher Technique vs Bowen Technique for Frozen Shoulder

Official title: Comparative Effects of Niel Asher Technique and Bowen Technique on Pain, Range of Motion and Functional Disability in Patients With Adhesive Capsulitis.

Run by Foundation University Islamabad · NCT07856173 · Data updated 2026-11-12

This trial tests whether two manual therapy methods differ in reducing shoulder pain and improving motion for people with frozen shoulder aged 40–60.

Quick facts

Study typeInterventional
Ages40 Years to 60 Years
SexAll
Enrollment54 (estimated)
SponsorFoundation University Islamabad
Academic / other
Locations1 site (Islamabad, Punjab Province)
StatusRecruiting
StartedFebruary 12, 2026
Main results expectedDecember 18, 2026
Study endsDecember 18, 2027
Registry record updatedOctober 2, 2026
Trial IDNCT07856173 on ClinicalTrials.gov

Is this trial a fit for you?

Likely a good fit

Adults aged 40–60 with unilateral stage II adhesive capsulitis (frozen shoulder) and 6+ months of symptoms, without recent shoulder surgery or corticosteroid therapy in the last 3 months.

Probably not a fit

People outside the age range, with non-frozen stage disease, or with certain exclusion conditions may not benefit.

A plain-English reading of the study's rules. Only the study team can confirm whether you qualify.

What this trial studies

This randomized, single-blind study compares the Niel-Asher Technique with the Bowen Technique to treat adhesive capsulitis in adults aged 40–60. Fifty-four participants with stage II frozen shoulder are randomly assigned to one of the two manual therapy approaches and will receive treatment over a one-year period at Foundation University Islamabad. Outcomes focus on pain, range of motion, and functional disability to determine which technique offers greater relief and functional benefit. The trial excludes recent corticosteroid use, prior shoulder surgery, and certain medical conditions that could confound results. The study adds to the evidence base for conservative management of adhesive capsulitis by directly comparing two non-pharmacological interventions.

Why it matters

Potential benefit: If successful, participants may experience reduced pain and improved shoulder motion and daily function.

How similar studies have gone: Prior studies have explored manual therapies for adhesive capsulitis, with mixed but generally positive signals for pain and ROM improvements using similar conservative approaches.

Who can join: the full rules

Show full inclusion / exclusion criteria
Inclusion criteria:

The participants with following criteria will be included in the study:

* Diagnosed case of unilateral primary or idiopathic Adhesive Capsulitis.
* Age ranging from 40-60 years.
* Frozen stage (Stage II).
* Having pain and restricted active and passive range of motion \>6 months.
* Capsular pattern of motion restriction (external rotation, abduction, internal rotation and flexion).
* Moderate (4-6) pain intensity on NPRS
* Both genders will be included.

Exclusion criteria:

The participants with following criteria will be excluded in the study:

* Local corticosteroid injection to the affected shoulder within the last three months or who were on current corticosteroid therapy.
* Any recent shoulder surgery.
* Patients with neurological disorders, such as stroke, as well as those with uncontrolled diabetes, rheumatic disease in the shoulder, malignant tumors.
* A history of the fracture or subluxation in the affected shoulder, history of surgery to the injured shoulder.

Where it's running

  • Foundation University College of Physical Therapy
    Islamabad, Punjab Province, Pakistan
    Recruiting

Study contacts

Similar studies

Other studies for the same condition or treatment. Recruiting studies are listed first.

How to take part

  1. Review the eligibility criteria above with your treating physician.
  2. Check the official listing on ClinicalTrials.gov for the latest contact details and recruitment status.
  3. Contact the study coordinator or principal investigator to ask for pre-screening. Pre-screening is free and never obligates you to enroll.
Last reviewed 2026-11-14 by the Find a Trial editorial team. Information on this page is for educational purposes and is not medical advice. Always consult qualified healthcare professionals about clinical trial participation.