Assessing readiness for extubation in brain-injured patients
Official title: Stepped Wedge Cluster Randomised Controlled Trial to Assess the Readiness of Extubation in Brain-injured Patients Using a Clinical Score
Run by University Hospital, Clermont-Ferrand · NCT04080440 · Data updated 2026-11-12
This study is testing a new way to see if brain-injured patients are ready to be taken off a breathing machine to help them recover better and avoid complications.
Quick facts
| Study type | Interventional |
|---|---|
| Ages | 18 Years to 75 Years |
| Sex | All |
| Enrollment | 660 (estimated) |
| Sponsor | University Hospital, Clermont-Ferrand Academic / other |
| Locations | 21 sites (Angers and 20 other locations) |
| Status | Recruiting |
| Started | February 9, 2020 |
| Main results expected | February 13, 2027 |
| Study ends | October 13, 2027 |
| Registry record updated | September 24, 2025 |
| Trial ID | NCT04080440 on ClinicalTrials.gov |
Is this trial a fit for you?
✓Likely a good fit
Ideal candidates for this study are adults aged 18 to 75 with acute brain injuries requiring mechanical ventilation and who have shown neurological stability.
✕Probably not a fit
Patients with posterior cranial fossa lesions, uncontrolled seizures, or those with a life expectancy of less than 48 hours may not benefit from this study.
A plain-English reading of the study's rules. Only the study team can confirm whether you qualify.
What this trial studies
The BIPER study is a stepped wedge cluster randomized clinical trial designed to reduce extubation failure rates in critically ill brain-injured patients who have impaired consciousness. It utilizes a validated clinical score to evaluate extubation readiness after mechanical ventilation. The study focuses on patients with acute cerebral lesions who have been on mechanical ventilation for over 48 hours and have successfully completed a spontaneous breathing trial. By identifying key clinical indicators associated with extubation success, the study aims to improve patient outcomes and reduce complications related to prolonged mechanical ventilation.
Why it matters
Potential benefit: If successful, this study could significantly improve the extubation success rates and overall recovery of brain-injured patients requiring mechanical ventilation.
How similar studies have gone: Previous studies have shown success with similar clinical scoring approaches in predicting extubation outcomes in brain-injured patients, indicating a promising avenue for this research.
Who can join: the full rules
Show full inclusion / exclusion criteria
Inclusion Criteria: * Acute cerebral lesion with a Glasgow Coma Scale \<13 needing admission in ICU and mechanical ventilation with tracheal intubation for neurological cause : cerebrovascular stroke either ischemic or hemorrhagic including aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage, traumatic brain injury, anoxo ischemic encephalopathy after cardiac arrest or brain tumour * Mechanical ventilation more than 48 hours * 18 to 75 years old * Neurological stability with no intracranial hypertension with minimal sedation * Glasgow Coma Scale motor response \< 6 * Spontaneous breathing trial succeeded * First extubation attempt Exclusion Criteria: * Posterior cranial fossa lesion * Admission for status epilepticus or central nervous system infection * Spinal cord injury (tetraplegia or paraplegia) * Uncontrolled status epilepticus or uncontrolled central nervous system infection * Care limitation plan * Chronic respiratory failure defined as ambulatory oxygen therapy or pressure support ventilation and/or proven COPD and/or ambulatory non-invasive CPAP therapy for sleep apnoea syndrome * More than 3 failed spontaneous breathing trials * Significant chest trauma (more than 2 broken ribs / broken sternum / with an indication of open thoracic surgery) * Surgery planned within 7 days * Tracheotomy or previous extubation outside of the protocol * Previous compromised upper airway permeability * Pregnant or breastfeeding woman * Adult under the protection of the law or without social assurance system * Inclusion in another clinical study about mechanical ventilation or weaning
Where it's running
-
Chu
Angers, France Recruiting -
Chu
Bordeaux, France Recruiting -
Chu
Bordeaux, France Recruiting -
Chu
Caen, France Recruiting -
Chu
Clermont-Ferrand, France Recruiting -
Chu
La Réunion, France Recruiting
Show 15 more locations
-
Chu
Lille, France Recruiting -
Hospices Civils de Lyon
Lyon, France Recruiting -
Chu
Montpellier, France Recruiting -
Chu
Nîmes, France Recruiting -
Fondation Ophtalmologique Adolphe de Rothschild
Paris, France Recruiting -
Chu
Poitiers, France Recruiting -
Chu
Rennes, France Recruiting -
Chu
Toulouse, France Recruiting -
Ch
Bourg-en-Bresse, France Terminated -
Chu
Grenoble, France Completed -
Aphm
Marseille, France Withdrawn -
Chu
Nantes, France Completed -
Pasteur 2 Hospital - University Hospital
Nice, France Terminated -
Chu
Saint-Etienne, France Completed -
Ch
Valence, France Terminated
Study contacts
- Principal investigator: Olivier Vincent — University Hospital, Grenoble
- Study coordinator: Lise Laclautre
- Email: promo_interne_drci@chu-clermontferrand.fr
- Phone: +33 4 73 754963
Similar studies
Other studies for the same condition or treatment. Recruiting studies are listed first.
-
Brain monitoring during ventilator therapy in critically ill patients
This study tests how lung-directed ventilator adjustments affect brain activity and blood flow in adults with acute brain injury who need mechanical ventilation.
-
Predicting extubation failure in ICU patients using a physiotherapy assessment
This study is trying to see if a physiotherapy assessment can help predict which ICU patients on a ventilator might struggle after being taken off the machine.
-
Pulse Wave vs Saline Bolus EIT to measure lung perfusion in ARDS
This study tests whether pulse wave EIT or saline bolus EIT can best show lung blood flow in ARDS patients on mechanical ventilation.
-
Computed inspiratory muscle pressure to monitor inspiratory effort during pressure-targeted assist/control ventilation
This study tests a noninvasive computed pressure method (cPmus) to see if it matches the traditional esophageal pressure method for measuring inspiratory effort in adults on pressure-targeted ventilation with spontaneous breathing.
-
Noninvasive estimate of inspiratory effort to monitor pressure support ventilation
This study tests whether a noninvasive computed inspiratory muscle pressure (cPmus) can match the traditional esophageal pressure method for adults on pressure support ventilation.
-
Driving pressure-guided individualized PEEP vs standard PEEP during upper abdominal surgery
In this randomized trial, adults at higher risk of breathing problems after upper abdominal surgery will try a personalized PEEP level based on the lowest driving pressure and compare it to a fixed PEEP of 5 cmH2O to see if it lowers postoperative lung complications.
How to take part
- Review the eligibility criteria above with your treating physician.
- Check the official listing on ClinicalTrials.gov for the latest contact details and recruitment status.
- Contact the study coordinator or principal investigator to ask for pre-screening. Pre-screening is free and never obligates you to enroll.