Acupressure for Postoperative Pain After Laparoscopic TEP Hernia Repair
Official title: The Effect of Acupressure on Postoperative Pain After Laparoscopic Totally Extraperitoneal Inguinal Hernia Repair: A Prospective Three-Arm Randomized Sham-Controlled Clinical Trial
Run by Medipol University · NCT07787871 · Data updated 2026-11-12
This trial tests whether true acupressure, given after surgery, reduces pain more than sham acupressure or standard care for adults undergoing laparoscopic TEP inguinal hernia repair.
Quick facts
| Study type | Interventional |
|---|---|
| Ages | 18 Years to 75 Years |
| Sex | All |
| Enrollment | 90 (estimated) |
| Sponsor | Medipol University Academic / other |
| Locations | 1 site (Istanbul, Istanbul) |
| Status | Recruiting |
| Started | June 20, 2026 |
| Main results expected | October 31, 2026 |
| Study ends | October 31, 2026 |
| Registry record updated | August 26, 2026 |
| Trial ID | NCT07787871 on ClinicalTrials.gov |
Is this trial a fit for you?
✓Likely a good fit
Adults aged 18–75 with unilateral primary inguinal hernia scheduled for elective laparoscopic TEP repair and suitable ASA I–III without anticipated ICU need.
✕Probably not a fit
Patients with bilateral/recurrent/strangulated hernias, prior lower abdominal surgery affecting sites, higher ASA risk (IV or needing ICU), skin issues at acupressure points, or recent acupressure use may not benefit.
A plain-English reading of the study's rules. Only the study team can confirm whether you qualify.
What this trial studies
In this randomized, sham-controlled study, 90 adults undergoing elective laparoscopic TEP inguinal hernia repair are assigned to one of three groups: standard postoperative care, true bilateral acupressure at four points, or sham acupressure at non-acupuncture points. Interventions are delivered at 1, 4, and 8 hours after surgery, each lasting about 3 minutes per point, with pain assessed by a Visual Analog Scale and secondary outcomes including analgesic use, nausea/vomiting, time to mobilization, satisfaction, and complications. The goal is to determine if true acupressure provides additional pain relief beyond standard care and whether its effects differ from sham stimulation. The study design is prospective, randomized, and three-armed to isolate specific effects of acupressure.
Why it matters
Potential benefit: If successful, true acupressure could offer an additional, noninvasive option to reduce postoperative pain and improve recovery.
How similar studies have gone: Prior research on acupressure for postoperative pain has shown mixed results, with some studies suggesting benefit and others showing no difference; this study adds a rigorous sham-control to clarify effectiveness.
Who can join: the full rules
Show full inclusion / exclusion criteria
Inclusion Criteria: * Adults aged 18 to 75 years * Diagnosis of a unilateral primary inguinal hernia * Scheduled to undergo elective laparoscopic total extraperitoneal (TEP) inguinal hernia repair * American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) physical status I to III without an anticipated need for postoperative intensive care * Ability to understand the study procedures and provide written informed consent Exclusion Criteria: Bilateral inguinal hernia * Recurrent inguinal hernia * Strangulated inguinal hernia * History of open lower abdominal surgery * Skin infection, wound, or surgical scar at any of the acupressure application sites * ASA physical status III with an anticipated need for postoperative intensive care * ASA physical status IV * Participation in another clinical study within the previous 4 weeks * Receipt of acupressure or a similar complementary treatment within the previous 4 weeks * Refusal or inability to provide written informed consent
Where it's running
-
Fatih Sultan Mehmet Training and Research Hospital
Istanbul, Istanbul, Turkey (Türkiye) Recruiting
Study contacts
- Study coordinator: Ahmet S Yaz, Md
- Email: ahmet.yaz@std.medipol.edu.tr
- Phone: +902165783000
Similar studies
Other studies for the same condition or treatment. Recruiting studies are listed first.
-
PECS II vs SPSIP nerve blocks for pain after mastectomy
This study tests whether two ultrasound-guided nerve blocks (PECS II and SPSIP) differ in how much opioid patients need after mastectomy.
-
Palatal Shield Technique to Reduce Pain and Improve Healing After Free Gingival Graft
This randomized trial tests whether a collagen sponge with a protective palatal shield made of flowable resin helps reduce pain and improve healing after free gingival graft harvest.
-
Two laparoscopic techniques for repairing inguinal hernias in children
This study tests whether LPEC or LIS works better for repairing inguinal hernias in children aged 1 to 15 who need laparoscopic repair.
-
Perfusion Index to Measure Postoperative Pain in Kids After Adenotonsillectomy
This study tests whether the perfusion index can reliably reflect pain levels in children aged 1–12 after adenotonsillectomy, comparing standard care with an added glossopharyngeal nerve block.
-
Anterior Knee Nerves Block vs Femoral Nerve Block for Knee Arthroscopy
This trial tests whether an anterior nerves of the knee (ANK) block provides similar pain relief to a femoral nerve block after knee arthroscopy in adults, aiming to reduce quadriceps weakness.
-
Natural Biopolymer-Based Irrigant for Root Canal Cleaning
This trial tests a chitosan nanoparticle irrigant to improve cleaning and disinfection in single-rooted teeth with asymptomatic pulp necrosis undergoing endodontic treatment.
How to take part
- Review the eligibility criteria above with your treating physician.
- Check the official listing on ClinicalTrials.gov for the latest contact details and recruitment status.
- Contact the study coordinator or principal investigator to ask for pre-screening. Pre-screening is free and never obligates you to enroll.