Clinical trial Recruiting at 1 site Interventional Ages 1 Year to 15

Two laparoscopic techniques for repairing inguinal hernias in children

Official title: Comparative Study of Laparoscopic Percutaneous Extraperitoneal Closure Versus Laparoscopic Intracorporeal Suture in Pediatric Hernia Repair.

Run by Quaid-e-Azam Medical College · NCT07915830 · Data updated 2026-11-12

This study tests whether LPEC or LIS works better for repairing inguinal hernias in children aged 1 to 15 who need laparoscopic repair.

Quick facts

Study typeInterventional
Ages1 Year to 15 Years
SexAll
Enrollment412 (estimated)
SponsorQuaid-e-Azam Medical College
Academic / other
Locations1 site (Bahawalpur, Punjab Province)
StatusRecruiting
StartedMay 12, 2026
Main results expectedNovember 11, 2026
Study endsNovember 11, 2026
Registry record updatedNovember 4, 2026
Trial IDNCT07915830 on ClinicalTrials.gov

Is this trial a fit for you?

Likely a good fit

Children aged 1 to 15 years with unilateral or bilateral inguinal hernias planned for laparoscopic repair, without prior abdominal surgery or complex comorbidities specified.

Probably not a fit

Children with recurrent, incarcerated, or previously operated hernias, coagulopathy, undescended testes, major congenital anomalies, congenital heart disease, or cerebral palsy may not benefit.

A plain-English reading of the study's rules. Only the study team can confirm whether you qualify.

What this trial studies

This randomized controlled trial compares two pediatric laparoscopic approaches for inguinal hernia repair: laparoscopic percutaneous extraperitoneal closure (LPEC) and laparoscopic intracorporeal suture (LIS). Participants are children with unilateral or bilateral hernias undergoing planned laparoscopic repair, excluding those with prior hernia operations, incarceration, or several major comorbidities. Randomization uses sealed opaque envelopes to assign participants to either LPEC or LIS. The study is conducted at Bahawal Victoria Hospital and led by Quaid-e-Azam Medical College. Outcomes will help determine if one technique offers superior safety or effectiveness in this population.

Why it matters

Potential benefit: If successful, the preferred technique could reduce recovery time, complications, or recurrence after pediatric hernia repair.

How similar studies have gone: Previous pediatric laparoscopic comparisons have shown varying outcomes, with some techniques performing similarly; this study adds contemporary randomized data for LPEC vs LIS.

Who can join: the full rules

Show full inclusion / exclusion criteria
Inclusion Criteria:

* unilateral or bilateral inguinal hernia
* planned to undergo laparoscopic hernia repair

Exclusion Criteria:

* recurrent hernia
* hernia after previous abdominal surgery
* incarcerated hernia
* coagulopathy
* Associated undescended testes
* Major congenital abdominal anomalies
* Children with congenital heart disease
* Cerebral palsy.

Where it's running

  • Qauad-e-Azam Medical College
    Bahawalpur, Punjab Province, Pakistan
    Recruiting

Study contacts

Similar studies

Other studies for the same condition or treatment. Recruiting studies are listed first.

How to take part

  1. Review the eligibility criteria above with your treating physician.
  2. Check the official listing on ClinicalTrials.gov for the latest contact details and recruitment status.
  3. Contact the study coordinator or principal investigator to ask for pre-screening. Pre-screening is free and never obligates you to enroll.
Last reviewed 2026-11-14 by the Find a Trial editorial team. Information on this page is for educational purposes and is not medical advice. Always consult qualified healthcare professionals about clinical trial participation.