VR exergames vs spinal manipulation for chronic nonspecific low back pain
Official title: Effects of Virtual Reality Exergames Versus Spinal Manipulation in Chronic Nonspecific Low Back Pain
Run by Cairo University · NCT07876960 · Data updated 2026-11-12
A single-session comparison to see if virtual reality exercise games or spinal manipulation provide better immediate relief for chronic nonspecific low back pain.
Quick facts
| Study type | Interventional |
|---|---|
| Ages | 20 Years to 55 Years |
| Sex | All |
| Enrollment | 80 (estimated) |
| Sponsor | Cairo University Academic / other |
| Locations | 1 site (Giza, Giza Governorate) |
| Status | Recruiting |
| Started | October 20, 2026 |
| Main results expected | December 20, 2026 |
| Study ends | January 1, 2027 |
| Registry record updated | October 30, 2026 |
| Trial ID | NCT07876960 on ClinicalTrials.gov |
Is this trial a fit for you?
✓Likely a good fit
Adults aged 20-55 with chronic nonspecific low back pain for at least 3 months and baseline pain ≥3/10.
✕Probably not a fit
Results may show no clear advantage of either intervention for some participants or may indicate limited short-term benefits.
A plain-English reading of the study's rules. Only the study team can confirm whether you qualify.
What this trial studies
This study tests the acute effects of two interventions on adults with chronic nonspecific low back pain. Participants are assigned to receive either a virtual reality exergame session or spinal manipulation, with outcomes including pain, fear of movement, mood, functional disability, and lumbar range of motion measured after the session. The trial aims to determine which approach yields greater short-term improvements and whether one method offers more benefit for these outcomes. VR exergames represent a modern rehabilitation option, while spinal manipulation is a traditional manual therapy; comparing them directly addresses their relative immediate impact. The study is conducted at Cairo University Hospitals under the lead sponsorship of Cairo University.
Why it matters
Potential benefit: If successful, the trial could identify which single-session intervention provides greater short-term relief and functional improvement for CNSLBP.
How similar studies have gone: Previous research has explored VR and spinal manipulation separately; direct head-to-head acute comparisons are less common but have shown potential benefits for pain and function.
Who can join: the full rules
Show full inclusion / exclusion criteria
Inclusion Criteria: * Adults aged 20-55 years * Chronic nonspecific low back pain lasting at least 3 months. * Pain intensity of ≥3/10 on the VAS at baseline. * Ability to understand and follow the instructions and complete the VR-EXG and spinal-manipulation procedures. * Ability to perform the required lumbar movements. Exclusion Criteria: * Specific spinal pathology, including fracture, spinal infection, malignancy, inflammatory/rheumatologic disease, or severe osteoporosis. * Previous lumbar or spinal surgery. * Neurological conditions or progressive neurological deficits, including significant radicular symptoms. * Serious cardiovascular, systemic, or other medical conditions that contraindicate physical exercise or spinal manipulation. * Pregnancy. * Current acute injury or condition that would prevent safe participation in VR-EXG or spinal manipulation. * Previous adverse reaction or contraindication to spinal manipulation. * Vestibular disorders, severe dizziness, or other conditions that could interfere with safe VR use. * Significant visual or auditory impairment that prevents participation in the VR intervention. * Inability to understand or perform the intervention or outcome assessments. * Use of analgesic medication within 48 hours before assessment/intervention.
Where it's running
-
Cairo University Hospitals
Giza, Giza Governorate, Egypt Recruiting
Study contacts
- Study coordinator: Ahmed El Melhat Associate Professor of MSK,BAU, PhD
- Email: ahmed.elmelhat@cau.edu.lb
- Phone: +20 11 12595022
Similar studies
Other studies for the same condition or treatment. Recruiting studies are listed first.
-
Is Central Sensitization a Predictor of Short-Term Change in Chronic Nonspecific Low Back Pain?
This study tests whether higher baseline central nervous system sensitivity can predict short-term improvements in disability and pain for adults with chronic nonspecific low back pain.
-
Gyrotonic exercise for elders with breast cancer and Behcet disease
We’re testing whether a gyrotonic exercise program helps older people who have both Behcet disease and breast cancer.
-
Palatal Shield Technique to Reduce Pain and Improve Healing After Free Gingival Graft
This randomized trial tests whether a collagen sponge with a protective palatal shield made of flowable resin helps reduce pain and improve healing after free gingival graft harvest.
-
Virtual Reality and Mental Practice to Improve Balance and Walking in Relapsing MS
This study tests whether virtual reality training or mental practice can improve balance and walking in people with relapsing–remitting multiple sclerosis.
-
Video Microscope vs Loupe-Assist in Varicocelectomy
This study tests whether using a video telescopic operating microscope (VITOM) provides better outcomes and surgeon satisfaction than loupe-assisted varicocelectomy in adult men with grade II/III varicoceles.
-
Isometric Handgrip Training Before and After Heart Surgery to Boost Recovery
This study tests whether gentle handgrip exercise before and after open-heart surgery helps people recover their physical ability and autonomic function.
How to take part
- Review the eligibility criteria above with your treating physician.
- Check the official listing on ClinicalTrials.gov for the latest contact details and recruitment status.
- Contact the study coordinator or principal investigator to ask for pre-screening. Pre-screening is free and never obligates you to enroll.