Clinical trial Recruiting at 1 site Interventional Ages 18 to 65

Venous Tourniquet with Low-Dose Sugammadex vs Arterial Tourniquet for Seizure Monitoring During ECT

Official title: Comparison of Venous Tourniquet Method With Isolated Forearm Technique in Electroconvulsive Therapy in Terms of Efficacy and Safety

Run by Medipol University · NCT07534475 · Data updated 2026-11-12

40 patients undergoing ECT will have a venous tourniquet on one arm and an arterial tourniquet on the other to see which method better reveals motor seizures.

More Schizophrenia trials

Quick facts

Study typeInterventional
Ages18 Years to 65 Years
SexAll
Enrollment20 (estimated)
SponsorMedipol University
Academic / other
Locations1 site (Istanbul)
StatusRecruiting
StartedApril 20, 2026
Main results expectedNovember 30, 2026
Study endsDecember 20, 2026
Registry record updatedJuly 27, 2026
Trial IDNCT07534475 on ClinicalTrials.gov

Is this trial a fit for you?

Likely a good fit

Adults with Major Depressive Disorder, Bipolar Disorder, or Schizophrenia scheduled for elective ECT, and ASA I–III.

Probably not a fit

Patients with contraindications to sugammadex or rocuronium, or with venous/lymphatic issues in the arms, may not benefit.

A plain-English reading of the study's rules. Only the study team can confirm whether you qualify.

What this trial studies

This prospective, open-label trial uses a within-subject design to compare two seizure monitoring approaches during ECT. After anesthesia and neuromuscular blockade, one arm receives an arterial tourniquet while the other arm uses a venous tourniquet with a regional low-dose sugammadex to partially reverse paralysis locally. Outcomes focus on seizure visibility and duration in each limb, as well as patient comfort and hemodynamic responses. The study aims to determine whether the venous tourniquet with sugammadex provides comparable or superior monitoring without the systemic side effects of IFT. Enrollment targets 40 adults with mood or psychotic disorders and ASA I-III, across Istanbul Medipol University.

Why it matters

Potential benefit: If successful, this method could offer a less painful and more comfortable alternative for monitoring seizures during ECT.

How similar studies have gone: Previous approaches like IFT are established but have ischemic discomfort; this intra-patient comparison is relatively novel and exploratory.

Who can join: the full rules

Show full inclusion / exclusion criteria
Inclusion Criteria:

* Patients scheduled for elective Electroconvulsive Therapy (ECT).
* ASA (American Society of Anesthesiologists) physical status I to III.

Exclusion Criteria:

* Known neuromuscular diseases (e.g., Myasthenia Gravis).
* Known allergy or hypersensitivity to sugammadex, rocuronium, ketamine, dexmedetomidine, or propofol.
* Presence of venous insufficiency, lymphedema, or active infection in the upper extremities.
* Severe cardiovascular instability.

Where it's running

  • Istanbul Medipol University
    Istanbul, Turkey (Türkiye)
    Recruiting

Similar studies

Other studies for the same condition or treatment. Recruiting studies are listed first.

How to take part

  1. Review the eligibility criteria above with your treating physician.
  2. Check the official listing on ClinicalTrials.gov for the latest contact details and recruitment status.
  3. Contact the study coordinator or principal investigator to ask for pre-screening. Pre-screening is free and never obligates you to enroll.
Last reviewed 2026-11-14 by the Find a Trial editorial team. Information on this page is for educational purposes and is not medical advice. Always consult qualified healthcare professionals about clinical trial participation.