Suction to collapse the kidney's collecting system after RIRS (retrograde intrarenal surgery)
Official title: Effect of Complete Suction-Induced Collapse of the Renal Collecting System at the End of Retrograde Intrarenal Surgery on Early Postoperative Outcomes: A Prospective Randomized Study
Run by Kangdong Sacred Heart Hospital · NCT07535281 · Data updated 2026-11-12
This trial will test whether actively suctioning the kidney's collecting system at the end of RIRS reduces early postoperative pain and infections for adults having kidney stone removal.
Quick facts
| Study type | Interventional |
|---|---|
| Ages | 20 Years to 80 Years |
| Sex | All |
| Enrollment | 90 (estimated) |
| Sponsor | Kangdong Sacred Heart Hospital Academic / other |
| Locations | 1 site (Gandong-gu, Outside U.S./Canada) |
| Status | Recruiting |
| Started | April 20, 2026 |
| Main results expected | September 2027 |
| Study ends | September 2027 |
| Registry record updated | April 23, 2026 |
| Trial ID | NCT07535281 on ClinicalTrials.gov |
Is this trial a fit for you?
✓Likely a good fit
Adults aged 20–80 with kidney stones who are scheduled for RIRS and can give informed consent, without pre-stenting, uncontrolled infection, solitary kidney, or other exclusion conditions, are ideal candidates.
✕Probably not a fit
Patients with a solitary kidney, uncontrolled urinary tract infection, a pre-placed ureteral stent, recent participation in another trial, or other exclusion criteria are unlikely to be eligible and may not benefit from this approach.
A plain-English reading of the study's rules. Only the study team can confirm whether you qualify.
What this trial studies
This randomized controlled trial compares active suction through a ureteral access sheath to induce collapse of the renal collecting system versus standard passive drainage at the end of RIRS. Ninety adult patients scheduled for RIRS will be randomized to the suction-induced collapse group or the standard drainage group at a single center. The primary outcome is immediate postoperative flank pain measured by the Numerical Rating Scale in the recovery room, with secondary outcomes including pain on postoperative day 1, infectious complications within 7 days, and total analgesic use. The technique is intended to reduce retained irrigation fluid and intrarenal pressure with a simple intraoperative modification performed before leaving the operating room.
Why it matters
Potential benefit: If successful, this simple intraoperative suction technique could lower early postoperative pain and reduce short-term infectious complications after RIRS.
How similar studies have gone: Suction devices and low-pressure techniques have been explored to reduce intrarenal pressure, but randomized data specifically testing suction-induced collapse at the end of RIRS are limited, so this is a relatively novel randomized test.
Who can join: the full rules
Show full inclusion / exclusion criteria
Inclusion Criteria: * Patients aged 20 to 80 years. * Patients diagnosed with kidney stones and scheduled for retrograde intrarenal surgery (RIRS). * Patients who have voluntarily signed the written informed consent form Exclusion Criteria: * Participation in another clinical trial (drug or device) within 1 month prior to enrollment. * Congenital abnormalities of the urinary or reproductive system. * Presence of a pre-placed ureteral stent (pre-stenting) at the time of surgery. * Solitary kidney. * Uncontrolled urinary tract infection. * History of ureteral reconstruction on the affected side. * Pregnancy. * Uncorrectable bleeding diathesis or ongoing therapeutic anticoagulation therapy. * Contraindications to general anesthesia. * Other conditions that the investigator deems inappropriate for participation in the study.
Where it's running
-
Kangdong Sacred Heart Hospital
Gandong-gu, Outside U.S./Canada, South Korea Recruiting
Study contacts
- Principal investigator: Han Kyu Chae, M.D., Ph.D. — Department of Urology, Kangdong Sacred Heart Hospital, Hallym University College of Medicine
- Study coordinator: Han Kyu Chae, M.D., Ph.D.
- Email: hanqsinopoli@gmail.com
- Phone: +821091869125
Similar studies
Other studies for the same condition or treatment. Recruiting studies are listed first.
-
Compare two suction ureteroscope devices for kidney stones (FANS vs CVAC)
This study tests whether two new suction-enabled ureteroscopes (FANS and CVAC) lead to better stone clearance for adults with small to medium kidney stones compared to each other.
-
Comparing three single-use flexible ureteroscopes for treating kidney stones
This compares three single-use flexible ureteroscopes to see which gives the best results for adults aged 18–60 with kidney stones smaller than 20 mm.
-
Shock wave treatment versus flexible ureteroscopy for a single 1–2 cm kidney stone
This research will test whether shock waves from outside the body (ESWL) or a flexible scope with laser (RIRS) works better for adults 18–65 who have a single 1–2 cm kidney stone.
-
Investigating oxalate production in patients with calcium oxalate kidney stones
This study is testing if people with calcium oxalate kidney stones produce more oxalate in their bodies than healthy individuals by following a special diet and taking certain supplements.
-
Comparing two laser systems for breaking up kidney stones
This study is testing whether a new type of laser for breaking up kidney stones works as well and as quickly as a current laser option during a minimally invasive procedure.
-
Suction vs Conventional Ureteral Access Sheaths in Kidney Stone Surgery
This study tests whether using a suction ureteral access sheath during RIRS helps adults clear stones more often and potentially reduces operative time and infections compared with a conventional sheath.
How to take part
- Review the eligibility criteria above with your treating physician.
- Check the official listing on ClinicalTrials.gov for the latest contact details and recruitment status.
- Contact the study coordinator or principal investigator to ask for pre-screening. Pre-screening is free and never obligates you to enroll.