Straight Leg Raise Test: Does it correctly identify nerve root issues?
Official title: Determination of Sensitivity and Specificity of Straight Leg Raise Test Via Transforaminal Nerve Root Block
Run by Marmara University · NCT07696312 · Data updated 2026-11-12
This study tests how accurately the straight leg raise test detects lumbosacral radicular pain compared with a nerve block reference standard in adults.
Quick facts
| Study type | Observational |
|---|---|
| Ages | 18 Years to 65 Years |
| Sex | All |
| Enrollment | 88 (estimated) |
| Sponsor | Marmara University Academic / other |
| Locations | 1 site (Istanbul, PENDİK) |
| Status | Recruiting |
| Started | December 11, 2025 |
| Main results expected | September 1, 2026 |
| Study ends | September 15, 2026 |
| Registry record updated | August 18, 2026 |
| Trial ID | NCT07696312 on ClinicalTrials.gov |
Is this trial a fit for you?
✓Likely a good fit
Adults aged 18-65 with suspected lumbar radicular pain and an upcoming transforaminal injection at L4, L5, or S1.
✕Probably not a fit
Patients with factors that impede test interpretation or those not undergoing the reference standard may not benefit.
A plain-English reading of the study's rules. Only the study team can confirm whether you qualify.
What this trial studies
This observational study evaluates the diagnostic performance of the straight leg raise test in adults with suspected lumbosacral radicular pain. The reference standard consists of diagnostic transforaminal epidural steroid injections or selective nerve root blocks performed without sedation and with low-dose local anesthetic. The study will calculate sensitivity, specificity, likelihood ratios, and the area under the ROC curve to determine how well the test identifies nerve root involvement. Data will be collected from participants scheduled for targeted injections at the L4, L5, or S1 levels, and analyses will focus on the test's reliability in guiding further diagnostic confirmation. Inclusion criteria require adults 18-65 with a preliminary radicular diagnosis and imaging support, while several safety and record-keeping exclusions apply.
Why it matters
Potential benefit: If successful, clinicians may better decide when the straight leg raise test alone is enough and when additional testing is needed.
How similar studies have gone: Previous work has shown variable diagnostic accuracy for the straight leg raise test; this study adds comparative data using a procedural reference standard.
Who can join: the full rules
Show full inclusion / exclusion criteria
Inclusion Criteria: * Age between 18 and 65 years. * Preliminary diagnosis of lumbar radicular pain based on medical history, physical examination, and lumbar magnetic resonance imaging. * Patients scheduled to undergo transforaminal epidural injection targeting the L4, L5, or S1 nerve root. Exclusion Criteria: * Inability to access clinical or procedural records in the hospital system. * Absence of available radiological records related to the target level, if required. * Inability to provide reliable NRS or straight leg raise test assessment due to cognitive impairment or language barrier. * Coagulopathy, defined as INR \> 1.5 or platelet count \< 80,000/mm³, or inability to discontinue anticoagulant or antiplatelet therapy when required. * Local or systemic infection, or skin lesion at the planned injection site. * Pregnancy or breastfeeding. * Known severe hypersensitivity to iodinated contrast material or local anesthetics. * Progressive neurological deficit or cauda equina syndrome. * Bilateral or nearly bilateral pain with both sides being prominent and equivalent, or need for therapeutic injection at more than one level during the same session. * Epidural injection with local anesthetic and/or steroid at the same level within the last 6 weeks. * Active polyneuropathy or other diffuse neuropathies. * Active radicular pain originating from nerve roots other than L4, L5, or S1. * Requirement for mandatory sedation.
Where it's running
-
Marmara University Faculty of Medicine, Pendik Training and Research Hospital, Algology Department Recruiting
Istanbul, Pendi̇k, Turkey (Türkiye) Recruiting
Study contacts
- Principal investigator: Mi̇kdat Can Karabiyik — Marmara University Faculty of Medicine ,Marmara University, Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation
- Study coordinator: Mi̇kdat Can Karabi̇yi̇k
- Email: mikdatkarabiyik@gmail.com
- Phone: +90 537 91 92 156
Similar studies
Other studies for the same condition or treatment. Recruiting studies are listed first.
-
Mulligan leg raise vs spinal mobilization with leg movement for lumbar radiculopathy
This trial tests whether Mulligan leg raise traction or spinal mobilization with leg movement helps people with lumbar radiculopathy feel better.
-
TECAR therapy added to physical therapy for chronic discogenic sciatica
This study tests whether adding TECAR therapy to a standard physical therapy program helps reduce pain and improve function in adults with chronic discogenic sciatica.
-
Pharmacopuncture vs. physical therapy for chronic lumbar radiculopathy
This pragmatic trial tests whether pharmacopuncture can help people with chronic lumbar radiculopathy as well as or better than physical therapy.
-
Femoral Stretch Test in L2-L4 Lumbar Radiculopathy
This study tests how well the femoral stretch test detects nerve root compression in people with L2-L4 radiculopathy who are having a targeted epidural injection as part of their care.
-
Trans-spinal Electromagnetic Neuromodulation added to physical therapy for discogenic L5-S1 radiculopathy
This study tests whether adding trans-spinal electromagnetic neuromodulation to standard physical therapy helps people with unilateral disc-related lower back nerve pain.
-
Effect of Mulligan Bent Leg Raise vs. Spinal Mobilization With Leg Movement for Lumbar Radiculopathy
A small study tests two manual therapy techniques to see which better eases leg pain and improves function in adults with lumbar radiculopathy.
How to take part
- Review the eligibility criteria above with your treating physician.
- Check the official listing on ClinicalTrials.gov for the latest contact details and recruitment status.
- Contact the study coordinator or principal investigator to ask for pre-screening. Pre-screening is free and never obligates you to enroll.