Clinical trial Recruiting at 1 site Interventional Ages 30 to 50

Mulligan leg raise vs spinal mobilization with leg movement for lumbar radiculopathy

Official title: Comparative Effect Between Mulligan Leg Raise and Spinal Mobilization With Limb Movement in Lumbar Radiculopathy

Run by Foundation University Islamabad · NCT07887685 · Data updated 2026-11-12

This trial tests whether Mulligan leg raise traction or spinal mobilization with leg movement helps people with lumbar radiculopathy feel better.

More Lumbar Radiculopathy trials

Quick facts

Study typeInterventional
Ages30 Years to 50 Years
SexAll
Enrollment44 (estimated)
SponsorFoundation University Islamabad
Academic / other
Locations1 site (Islamabad, Punjab Province)
StatusRecruiting
StartedSeptember 23, 2026
Main results expectedJanuary 1, 2027
Study endsJanuary 15, 2027
Registry record updatedOctober 21, 2026
Trial IDNCT07887685 on ClinicalTrials.gov

Is this trial a fit for you?

Likely a good fit

Adults aged 30–50 with unilateral lumbar radiculopathy due to mild posterior-lateral disc herniation and positive SLR/slump tests, without signs of spinal instability or severe neurological deficit.

Probably not a fit

Individuals with significant neuroforaminal stenosis, structural abnormalities requiring surgery, spinal instability, cauda equina signs, previous spinal surgery, or other exclusion criteria may not benefit or could be unsuitable for these therapies.

A plain-English reading of the study's rules. Only the study team can confirm whether you qualify.

What this trial studies

Participants with unilateral lumbar radiculopathy due to mild disc herniation are randomly assigned to receive either Mulligan leg raise traction or spinal mobilization with limb movement (SMWLM). Outcomes include pain, functional disability, and lumbar range of motion measured by VAS, ODI, and a bubble inclinometer. The study is conducted at Foundation University College of Physical Therapy in Islamabad, with adults aged 30–50 and specific clinical and MRI criteria. The aim is to compare the relative effectiveness of the two manual therapy approaches over the treatment period.

Why it matters

Potential benefit: If successful, patients may experience greater pain relief and improved function from one of the manual therapy approaches for lumbar radiculopathy.

How similar studies have gone: Prior studies have explored similar manual therapy approaches for radiculopathy, with mixed but generally encouraging results for symptom relief and function.

Who can join: the full rules

Show full inclusion / exclusion criteria
Inclusion Criteria:

Age 30 -50 years both male and female Unilateral lumbar radiculopathy Posteriolateral mild disc herniation on MRI SLR test positive (30 to 70) degree crossed SLR test positive Slump test positive pain and symptoms distribution in dermatomal pattern of L4 and L5

Exclusion Criteria; MRI findings indicating Spinal instability Significant neuroforaminal stenosis Structural abnormalities requiring surgical intervention (e.g., large disc herniation ) Clinical findings indicating: presence of severe neurological and severe motor weakness (Manual MuscleTesting grades 0, 1, or 2) Signs of cauda equina lesion (e.g., saddle anesthesia, bowel/bladder dysfunction) Diagnosed spinal conditions; Lumbar spondylolisthesis, Lumbar spine fracture, Spinal stenosis, Spinal tumor, Ankylosing spondylitis History of previous spinal surgery Pregnancy

Where it's running

  • Foundation University College of Physical Therapy
    Islamabad, Punjab Province, Pakistan
    Recruiting

Study contacts

Similar studies

Other studies for the same condition or treatment. Recruiting studies are listed first.

How to take part

  1. Review the eligibility criteria above with your treating physician.
  2. Check the official listing on ClinicalTrials.gov for the latest contact details and recruitment status.
  3. Contact the study coordinator or principal investigator to ask for pre-screening. Pre-screening is free and never obligates you to enroll.
Last reviewed 2026-11-14 by the Find a Trial editorial team. Information on this page is for educational purposes and is not medical advice. Always consult qualified healthcare professionals about clinical trial participation.