Clinical trial Recruiting at 1 site Interventional Ages 20 to 40

Effect of Mulligan Bent Leg Raise vs. Spinal Mobilization With Leg Movement for Lumbar Radiculopathy

Official title: Comparative Effects of Mulligan Bent Leg Raise Versus Spinal Mobilization With Leg Movement on Pain, Neural Mobility, Balance and Functional Disability in Lumbar Radiculopathy

Run by Riphah International University · NCT07726823 · Data updated 2026-11-12

A small study tests two manual therapy techniques to see which better eases leg pain and improves function in adults with lumbar radiculopathy.

Quick facts

Study typeInterventional
Ages20 Years to 40 Years
SexAll
Enrollment52 (estimated)
SponsorRiphah International University
Academic / other
Locations1 site (Lahore, Punjab Province)
StatusRecruiting
StartedJune 20, 2026
Main results expectedAugust 20, 2026
Study endsSeptember 20, 2026
Registry record updatedJuly 24, 2026
Trial IDNCT07726823 on ClinicalTrials.gov

Is this trial a fit for you?

Likely a good fit

Ideal candidates are adults 20–40 with unilateral lumbar radiculopathy due to L4/L5 or L5/S1 disc issues confirmed by MRI.

Probably not a fit

Participants with red flags, recent spinal surgery, severe osteoporosis or vertebral fractures, pregnancy, or systemic inflammatory diseases may not benefit.

A plain-English reading of the study's rules. Only the study team can confirm whether you qualify.

What this trial studies

This randomized clinical trial compares Mulligan Bent Leg Raise (MBLR) to Spinal Mobilization With Leg Movement (SMWLM) in adults aged 20–40 with unilateral lumbar radiculopathy. Fifty-two participants are enrolled and randomized into two equal groups to receive treatments three times weekly for four weeks at a physiotherapy outpatient setting in Lahore. Outcomes include pain (NPRS), neural mobility (SLR and Slump Test), and function/balance measures (ODI, TUG, and 5-repetition sit-to-stand), with assessments at baseline, 2 weeks, 4 weeks, and 8-week follow-up. Assessors are blinded to group assignment to minimize bias, and data will be analyzed with SPSS version 25.

Why it matters

Potential benefit: If successful, one technique may offer faster pain relief and better functional gains for people with this condition.

How similar studies have gone: Manual therapy approaches for lumbar radiculopathy have shown promising short-term benefits in prior studies, though head-to-head comparisons like this are less common.

Who can join: the full rules

Show full inclusion / exclusion criteria
Inclusion Criteria:

* Age 20 to 40 years (26)
* Diagnosed patient with Unilateral Lumbar Radiculopathy secondary to L4/L5 and L5/S1 lumbar posterolateral disc buldge confirmed on MRI (12)
* Posterolateral Lumbar Radiculopathy

Exclusion Criteria:

* • Presence of red flags (e.g., cauda equina syndrome, severe neurological deficits).

  * Previous spinal surgery within 1 year.
  * Severe osteoporosis or vertebral fractures.
  * Pregnant women.
  * Systemic inflammatory or autoimmune diseases.

Where it's running

  • Femwell Physiocare Woman Rehab clinic
    Lahore, Punjab Province, Pakistan
    Recruiting

Study contacts

  • Principal investigator: Amna Zia, PhD — King Edward Medical University
  • Study coordinator: Amna Zia, PhD*
  • Email: amna.zia@kemu.edu.pk
  • Phone: 03244686993

Similar studies

Other studies for the same condition or treatment. Recruiting studies are listed first.

How to take part

  1. Review the eligibility criteria above with your treating physician.
  2. Check the official listing on ClinicalTrials.gov for the latest contact details and recruitment status.
  3. Contact the study coordinator or principal investigator to ask for pre-screening. Pre-screening is free and never obligates you to enroll.
Last reviewed 2026-11-14 by the Find a Trial editorial team. Information on this page is for educational purposes and is not medical advice. Always consult qualified healthcare professionals about clinical trial participation.