Clinical trial Recruiting at 1 site Observational Ages 18 and up

Sacral ESP plus adductor canal block versus iPACK plus adductor canal block for pain control after knee replacement

Official title: Effectiveness of the Sacral Erector Spinae Plane (ESP) Block in Total Knee Arthroplasty: A Prospective Observational Study

Run by San Giovanni di Dio Hospital · NCT07017400 · Data updated 2026-11-12

This will test whether adding a sacral erector spinae plane (ESP) block to an adductor canal block gives adults having a unilateral knee replacement as good or better pain relief and recovery as adding an iPACK block.

Quick facts

Study typeObservational
Ages18 Years and up
SexAll
Enrollment126 (estimated)
SponsorSan Giovanni di Dio Hospital
Academic / other
Locations1 site (Crotone)
StatusRecruiting
StartedJuly 16, 2025
Main results expectedDecember 2027
Study endsDecember 2027
Registry record updatedAugust 28, 2025
Trial IDNCT07017400 on ClinicalTrials.gov

Is this trial a fit for you?

Likely a good fit

Adults over 18 years with ASA physical status I–III scheduled for unilateral total knee arthroplasty under spinal anesthesia with expected hospitalization >24 hours.

Probably not a fit

Patients with contraindications to spinal or regional anesthesia, active infection, severe dementia, anticoagulation issues, or emergency surgeries are excluded and unlikely to benefit from participation.

A plain-English reading of the study's rules. Only the study team can confirm whether you qualify.

What this trial studies

This single-center prospective observational study in Crotone, Italy will follow adults (ASA I–III) undergoing unilateral total knee arthroplasty under spinal anesthesia who receive either adductor canal block (ACB) plus sacral ESP or ACB plus iPACK as part of routine care. Participants will be observed for 48 hours postoperatively and the primary outcome is the QoR-15 score at 24 hours, with pain scores and other recovery measures as secondary endpoints. The planned enrollment is 63 patients per group based on power calculations to detect a meaningful difference in QoR-15. Because the design is observational, clinicians choose the block combination as usual care and investigators record outcomes without altering treatment.

Why it matters

Potential benefit: If successful, the sacral ESP plus ACB approach could provide comparable pain relief with fewer surgical-site risks and less motor weakness, improving safety and recovery after knee replacement.

How similar studies have gone: Early reports and local clinical experience suggest sacral ESP combined with ACB may offer comparable analgesia to ACB plus iPACK, but high-quality comparative data are still limited.

Who can join: the full rules

Show full inclusion / exclusion criteria
Inclusion Criteria:

* Adults \>18 years
* ASA I-III
* scheduled for unilateral TKA with expected hospitalization \> 24 hours

Exclusion Criteria:

* Refusal of consent
* Local anesthetics allergies
* contraindications to spinal or regional anesthesia
* coagulation disorders
* anticoagulation/antiaggregation medications
* dementia
* ASA-PS \> III
* ongoing infection
* emergency surgeries

Where it's running

  • San Giovanni Crotone Hospital
    Crotone, Italy
    Recruiting

Study contacts

Similar studies

Other studies for the same condition or treatment. Recruiting studies are listed first.

How to take part

  1. Review the eligibility criteria above with your treating physician.
  2. Check the official listing on ClinicalTrials.gov for the latest contact details and recruitment status.
  3. Contact the study coordinator or principal investigator to ask for pre-screening. Pre-screening is free and never obligates you to enroll.
Last reviewed 2026-11-14 by the Find a Trial editorial team. Information on this page is for educational purposes and is not medical advice. Always consult qualified healthcare professionals about clinical trial participation.