Routine use of Potassium Competitive Acid Blocker vs guideline GI protection in AMI with PCI
Official title: Routine Use of Potassium Competitive Acid Blocker Versus Guideline-Directed Gastrointestinal Protection Strategy in Patients With Acute Myocardial Infarction Undergoing Percutaneous Coronary Intervention on Dual Antiplatelet Therapy: A Randomized Trial
Run by Samsung Medical Center · NCT07467213 · Data updated 2026-11-12
This trial tests whether giving a potassium competitive acid blocker regularly after AMI with PCI and DAPT helps more than following standard GI protection guidelines.
Quick facts
| Phase | Phase 3 |
|---|---|
| Study type | Interventional |
| Ages | 19 Years and up |
| Sex | All |
| Enrollment | 5000 (estimated) |
| Sponsor | Samsung Medical Center Academic / other |
| Locations | 1 site (Seoul) |
| Status | Recruiting |
| Started | June 23, 2026 |
| Main results expected | December 31, 2029 |
| Study ends | December 31, 2030 |
| Registry record updated | June 26, 2026 |
| Trial ID | NCT07467213 on ClinicalTrials.gov |
Is this trial a fit for you?
✓Likely a good fit
Adults 19 and older with AMI undergoing PCI and on DAPT, who consent to participate.
✕Probably not a fit
Patients with contraindications to P-CAB or PPI, active GI bleeding, or non-cardiac life expectancy under 1 year may not benefit.
A plain-English reading of the study's rules. Only the study team can confirm whether you qualify.
What this trial studies
This is a multicenter, open-label, randomized Phase 3 trial enrolling 5,000 AMI patients undergoing PCI who are on dual antiplatelet therapy. Participants are assigned 1:1 to either routine use of a potassium competitive acid blocker (P-CAB) or to a guideline-directed GI protection strategy, with Zastaprazan or a proton pump inhibitor as the investigated agents. The primary endpoint is Net Adverse Clinical Events (NACE), a composite of death, MI, stroke, or BARC 3-5 bleeding at 1 year. The study aims to determine which GI protection approach yields better overall cardiovascular and bleeding outcomes in this high-risk population. Data will be collected across multiple centers with standardized follow-up.
Why it matters
Potential benefit: If successful, the approach could reduce GI bleeding and other adverse events while preserving cardiovascular safety.
How similar studies have gone: Previous GI-protection strategies have shown mixed results; this trial tests a more routine P-CAB approach in a modern PCI/DAPT context.
Who can join: the full rules
Show full inclusion / exclusion criteria
Inclusion Criteria: * Patients aged 19 years or older. * Patients diagnosed with acute myocardial infarction (ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction \[STEMI\] or non-ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction \[NSTEMI\]). * Patients who underwent percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) with drug-eluting stents (DES) or drug-coated balloons (DCB). * Patients (or their legal representatives) who understood the study risks and benefits and provided voluntary written informed consent. Exclusion Criteria: * History of hypersensitivity (e.g., allergic reaction, anaphylactic shock) or contraindication to study drugs (potassium-competitive acid blocker \[P-CAB\] or proton pump inhibitor \[PPI\]). * Presence of active gastrointestinal bleeding. * Pregnant or breastfeeding women. * Non-cardiac life expectancy of less than 1 year or patients expected to have low compliance (as determined by the investigator's medical judgment). * Patients who refuse to participate or are unable to follow the requirements specified in the study protocol.
Where it's running
-
Samsung Medical center
Seoul, South Korea Recruiting
Similar studies
Other studies for the same condition or treatment. Recruiting studies are listed first.
-
Endovascular treatment outcomes after portal hypertension–related GI bleeding in cirrhosis
This study tests how well endovascular procedures for portal hypertension–related GI bleeding work in adults with cirrhosis, and what factors predict outcomes.
-
Can 1-Hz rTMS help with heart rhythm and inflammation after a heart attack?
This trial tests whether daily 1-Hz repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation can improve heart rate variability and reduce inflammation in people who have had an acute myocardial infarction, compared with a sham procedure.
-
Trends and risk factors for adverse events after primary PCI in AMI patients over 20 years
This study looks at real-world AMI patients who had a primary PCI to see how often serious events happen during a 2-year follow-up and what factors predict them.
-
SPIKE FLOW endocardial pacing lead safety and performance study
This study tests whether the SPIKE FLOW temporary endocardial pacing lead is safe and effective in adults needing temporary pacing during heart-related conditions.
-
Predict Arrhythmia Risk with Intelligent Software
Researchers are testing AI-powered predictions to see if clinicians can spot patients at risk for dangerous heart rhythms using bedside ECG data.
-
Left Ventricular Support and Advanced Monitoring in AMI–Cardiogenic Shock: Immediate Impella Use and PAC/Monitoring vs Standard Care
In adults with heart attack-related cardiogenic shock, this trial tests whether using an Impella left ventricular assist device and/or protocolized pulmonary artery catheter monitoring improves survival compared with standard care.
How to take part
- Review the eligibility criteria above with your treating physician.
- Check the official listing on ClinicalTrials.gov for the latest contact details and recruitment status.
- Contact the study coordinator or principal investigator to ask for pre-screening. Pre-screening is free and never obligates you to enroll.