Permissive lung-protective ventilation for adults on invasive ventilators
Official title: Effects of PERMISSive Lung-protective Ventilation on Outcome in Critically Ill Invasively Ventilated Patients (PERMISS) - a Feasibility and Safety Pilot Study for a Randomized Clinical Trial
Run by Reinier de Graaf Groep · NCT07077174 · Data updated 2026-11-12
This tests whether using a lower breathing rate on the ventilator (allowing higher CO2) is safe and workable for adults in the ICU who are invasively ventilated for acute low oxygen levels.
Quick facts
| Study type | Interventional |
|---|---|
| Ages | 18 Years and up |
| Sex | All |
| Enrollment | 56 (estimated) |
| Sponsor | Reinier de Graaf Groep Academic / other |
| Locations | 5 sites (Almelo and 4 other locations) |
| Status | Recruiting |
| Started | August 31, 2025 |
| Main results expected | July 31, 2026 |
| Study ends | August 31, 2026 |
| Registry record updated | July 8, 2026 |
| Trial ID | NCT07077174 on ClinicalTrials.gov |
Is this trial a fit for you?
✓Likely a good fit
Adults (over 18) admitted to participating ICUs who are intubated for acute hypoxemic respiratory failure and expected to need invasive ventilation for more than 24 hours, without ECMO, severe COPD, or contraindications to permissive hypercapnia, are ideal candidates.
✕Probably not a fit
Patients with contraindications to hypercapnia (recent cardiac ischemia or raised intracranial pressure), those on ECMO, or with severe COPD (GOLD III/IV) are unlikely to benefit from this strategy.
A plain-English reading of the study's rules. Only the study team can confirm whether you qualify.
What this trial studies
This is a multicenter, randomized pilot trial comparing a permissive lung-protective ventilation strategy (lower respiratory rate with permissive hypercapnia) to conventional lung-protective ventilation in adult ICU patients intubated for acute hypoxemic respiratory failure. The primary goals are to determine feasibility and safety and to inform the design of a larger randomized trial focused on patient-centered outcomes. Key exclusions include prior prolonged ventilation before ICU admission, use of ECMO, severe COPD (GOLD III/IV), and contraindications to hypercapnia such as ongoing cardiac ischemia or raised intracranial pressure. Enrolment occurs at participating Dutch hospitals and patients are randomized to one of the two ventilation approaches while closely monitored for respiratory and systemic effects.
Why it matters
Potential benefit: If successful, this approach could lower the intensity of ventilator support and reduce ventilator-related lung injury and complications.
How similar studies have gone: Related lung-protective approaches such as low tidal volume ventilation with permissive hypercapnia have shown benefit in ARDS, but specifically lowering respiratory rate to reduce mechanical power is less tested and remains novel in large trials.
Who can join: the full rules
Show full inclusion / exclusion criteria
Inclusion Criteria: * admission to one of the participating ICUs; * intubated and receiving invasive ventilation with an expected duration of ventilation of at least 24 hours. Exclusion Criteria: * age below 18 years; * receiving invasive ventilation \> 1 hour in the ICU, or receiving invasive ventilation \> 6 hours directly preceding the current ICU admission (i.e., in the operating room or in the emergency department); * receiving or planned to receive veno-venous, veno-arterial or arterio-venous extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO); * having COPD GOLD III and IV; * contra-indication for hypercapnia, such as ongoing cardiac ischemia (as defined in the guideline of the European Society of Cardiology), or having suspected or confirmed increased intracranial pressure due to brain injury, judged by the attending physician; * any neurologic diagnosis that can prolong duration of mechanical ventilation, e.g., Guillain-Barré syndrome, high spinal cord lesion or amyotrophic lateral sclerosis, multiple sclerosis, or myasthenia gravis; * suspected or confirmed pregnancy; * participation in another interventional trial using similar endpoints; * previously randomized in this study; * no informed consent; or * admitted for terminal care
Where it's running
-
ZiekenhuisGroep Twente
Almelo, Netherlands Recruiting -
Amsterdam UMC
Amsterdam, Netherlands Recruiting -
Reinier de Graaf Hospital
Delft, Netherlands Recruiting -
Dijklander Hospital
Hoorn, Netherlands Recruiting -
Vall d'Hebron
Barcelona, Spain Recruiting
Study contacts
- Principal investigator: Laura Buiteman-Kruizinga, RN, PhD — Reinier de Graaf Groep
- Study coordinator: Laura A. Buiteman-Kruizinga, RN, PhD
- Email: l.kruizinga@rdgg.nl
- Phone: +31152604040
Similar studies
Other studies for the same condition or treatment. Recruiting studies are listed first.
-
Permissive lung-protective ventilation in invasively ventilated adults
This study tests whether lowering the breathing rate during mechanical ventilation is better than standard lung-protective ventilation for adults in the ICU who need invasive ventilation.
-
Pulse Wave vs Saline Bolus EIT to measure lung perfusion in ARDS
This study tests whether pulse wave EIT or saline bolus EIT can best show lung blood flow in ARDS patients on mechanical ventilation.
-
Computed inspiratory muscle pressure to monitor inspiratory effort during pressure-targeted assist/control ventilation
This study tests a noninvasive computed pressure method (cPmus) to see if it matches the traditional esophageal pressure method for measuring inspiratory effort in adults on pressure-targeted ventilation with spontaneous breathing.
-
Noninvasive estimate of inspiratory effort to monitor pressure support ventilation
This study tests whether a noninvasive computed inspiratory muscle pressure (cPmus) can match the traditional esophageal pressure method for adults on pressure support ventilation.
-
Driving pressure-guided individualized PEEP vs standard PEEP during upper abdominal surgery
In this randomized trial, adults at higher risk of breathing problems after upper abdominal surgery will try a personalized PEEP level based on the lowest driving pressure and compare it to a fixed PEEP of 5 cmH2O to see if it lowers postoperative lung complications.
-
Inspiratory Effort and Dyspnea During Assisted Mechanical Ventilation in Critically Ill Adults
This study tests how different patient breathing efforts relate to breathlessness in adults on assisted mechanical ventilation.
How to take part
- Review the eligibility criteria above with your treating physician.
- Check the official listing on ClinicalTrials.gov for the latest contact details and recruitment status.
- Contact the study coordinator or principal investigator to ask for pre-screening. Pre-screening is free and never obligates you to enroll.