Norepinephrine vs Dopamine as the First Vasoactive Drug in Cardiogenic Shock
Official title: Assessing Catecholamine Treatment Initiation Options: Norepinephrine vs Dopamine for Cardiogenic Shock
Run by Chonnam National University Hospital · NCT07562932 · Data updated 2026-11-12
This trial tests whether norepinephrine or dopamine works better and is safer as the first drug given to adults with cardiogenic shock.
Quick facts
| Study type | Interventional |
|---|---|
| Ages | 19 Years and up |
| Sex | All |
| Enrollment | 512 (estimated) |
| Sponsor | Chonnam National University Hospital Academic / other |
| Locations | 1 site (Gwangju, Jeollanam-do) |
| Status | Recruiting |
| Started | June 16, 2026 |
| Main results expected | May 31, 2031 |
| Study ends | May 31, 2032 |
| Registry record updated | October 15, 2026 |
| Trial ID | NCT07562932 on ClinicalTrials.gov |
Is this trial a fit for you?
✓Likely a good fit
Adults (age 19+) with cardiogenic shock classified as SCAI C or D who require vasoactive support and meet hemodynamic criteria.
✕Probably not a fit
Patients whose shock etiology or comorbidity profiles make neither drug clearly advantageous may see no differential benefit.
A plain-English reading of the study's rules. Only the study team can confirm whether you qualify.
What this trial studies
This multicenter, open-label randomized trial compares norepinephrine to dopamine as the initial vasoactive therapy in adults with cardiogenic shock. Participants are assigned to receive one of the two drugs according to a protocol-defined dosing algorithm and receive standard care across centers. The study aims to determine which agent better stabilizes blood pressure and tissue perfusion while minimizing complications such as arrhythmias or the need for mechanical circulatory support. Primary outcomes focus on death or progression of shock, with secondary considerations on safety and hemodynamic improvement. The trial is conducted at Chonnam National University Hospital and reflects contemporary management practices for cardiogenic shock.
Why it matters
Potential benefit: If norepinephrine proves superior or safer, patients with cardiogenic shock could experience better stabilization and outcomes with a standardized first-line vasoactive strategy.
How similar studies have gone: Previous observational and randomized studies suggested possible safety differences, but confirmation in modern, standardized practice remains needed.
Who can join: the full rules
Show full inclusion / exclusion criteria
Inclusion Criteria: 1\&2
1. Age ≥ 19
2. Cardiogenic shock (a) in the stage of Society for cardiovascular angiography and intervention (SCAI) C or D
* Cardiogenic shock (a) was defined as follows, and should fulfill both 1) and 2)
1. systolic blood pressure \<90 mm Hg for ≥30 min or need of inotropes or vasopressors to maintain systolic blood pressure \>90 mm Hg And
2. Impaired cardiac function confirmed by cardiac catheterization or echocardiography
a Cardiogenic shock was defined as follows, and should fulfill both 1) and 2)
<!-- -->
1. systolic blood pressure \<90 mm Hg for ≥30 min or need of inotropes or vasopressors to maintain systolic blood pressure \>90 mm Hg And
2. Impaired cardiac function confirmed by cardiac catheterization or echocardiography
* Cardiac index (CI) \< 2.2 L/min/m², measured by pulmonary artery catheter
* Left ventricular ejection fraction LVEF \< 45% on echocardiography;
* Right ventricular dysfunction, defined by one or more of: TAPSE \< 17 mm; S' \< 9.5 cm/sec; FAC \< 35%11; or visual estimation of RV wall motion abnormality.
Or Structural cardiac abnormality capable of causing cardiogenic shock, even if LV/RV systolic indices do not meet the thresholds above (examples, infarct ventricular septal rupture or severe valvular regurgitation)
Patients will be further classified based on the SCAI shock classification system12 as follows:
* SCAI B: no signs of hypoperfusion
* SCAI C: any signs of hypoperfusion, cardiogenic shock will be classified as SCAI C, and these include mental status change, cool and clammy skin, mottled skin appearance, decreased urine output (30ml/hour) or lactate over 2.0mmol/L
* SCAI D: shock progression despite use of the index vasoactive agent at ≥75% of the predefined maximal dose
* SCAI E: Impending arrest or overt circulatory collapse
Exclusion Criteria: any of these,
1. Administration of vasoactive drug more than 6 hours before enrollment
2. Receiving norepinephrine or dopamine at doses exceeding the protocol defined maximal dose at the time of enrollment.
3. Receiving any vasoactive agent other than norepinephrine or dopamine
4. Patients receiving a continuous infusion of both norepinephrine and dopamine
5. Patients already on temporary mechanical circulatory supportb before enrollment
6. Cardiogenic shock in the stage of SCAI E
7. Glasgow Coma Scale lower than 8 or other evidence of irreversible brain injury
8. Shock etiologies other than cardiogenic which include postcardiotomy shock or mixed shock
9. Pregnancy or lactation
Where it's running
-
Chonnam National University Hospital
Gwangju, Jeollanam-do, South Korea Recruiting
Study contacts
- Principal investigator: Min Chul Kim, Professor, MD, PhD — Chonnam National University Hospital
- Study coordinator: Min Chul Kim, Professor, MD, PhD
- Email: kmc3242@hanmail.net
- Phone: 820622204770
Similar studies
Other studies for the same condition or treatment. Recruiting studies are listed first.
-
Factors Influencing Outcomes in ECMO and Impella Patients
This study tests whether metabolic and thyroid hormone changes help predict survival for adults on ECMO or Impella at a single Hungarian cardiac ICU.
-
Evaluating a noninvasive tissue sensor to detect cardiogenic shock earlier in heart patients
This pilot, noninvasive study tests whether the NIRSense wearable can help detect deterioration in adults with cardiogenic shock risk due to heart attack or heart failure.
-
Safety and Efficacy of an Extracorporeal Ventricular Assist System for Cardiogenic Shock
This study tests whether an extracorporeal ventricular assist device can safely provide short-term heart support and help patients with cardiogenic shock or trouble weaning from bypass.
-
Left Ventricular Support and Advanced Monitoring in AMI–Cardiogenic Shock: Immediate Impella Use and PAC/Monitoring vs Standard Care
In adults with heart attack-related cardiogenic shock, this trial tests whether using an Impella left ventricular assist device and/or protocolized pulmonary artery catheter monitoring improves survival compared with standard care.
-
CRP Apheresis for infarct-related cardiogenic shock
This study tests whether selectively removing C-reactive protein with apheresis, in addition to standard care, helps people with cardiogenic shock after a heart attack.
-
Compare two ventilator modes in adults with cardiac ICU needs and invasive ventilation
This pilot tests whether volume-controlled versus pressure-controlled ventilation can be safely used in adults with heart disease and respiratory failure who need invasive ventilation.
How to take part
- Review the eligibility criteria above with your treating physician.
- Check the official listing on ClinicalTrials.gov for the latest contact details and recruitment status.
- Contact the study coordinator or principal investigator to ask for pre-screening. Pre-screening is free and never obligates you to enroll.