Modified Mini-PCNL vs Standard PCNL for Complex Kidney Stones
Official title: Modified Mini Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy Versus Standard Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy for the Treatment of Complex Renal Calculi: A Multicenter Randomized Controlled Trial
Run by The First Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University · NCT07697677 · Data updated 2026-11-12
This study tests whether a smaller 20 Fr access in modified mini-PCNL can match the stone-clearing success of the standard 24 Fr PCNL in adults with complex kidney stones.
Quick facts
| Study type | Interventional |
|---|---|
| Ages | 18 Years to 70 Years |
| Sex | All |
| Enrollment | 1380 (estimated) |
| Sponsor | The First Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University Academic / other |
| Locations | 1 site (Guangzhou, Guangdong) |
| Status | Recruiting |
| Started | July 15, 2026 |
| Main results expected | July 14, 2027 |
| Study ends | September 14, 2027 |
| Registry record updated | July 13, 2026 |
| Trial ID | NCT07697677 on ClinicalTrials.gov |
Is this trial a fit for you?
✓Likely a good fit
Adults 18 years and older with complex renal stones (stone surface area >1500 mm², multiple calyceal stones, staghorn or complex anatomy) and suitable ASA I-III status.
✕Probably not a fit
Patients with solitary kidneys, morbid obesity, prior renal transplantation, or other exclusion criteria may not benefit from this approach.
A plain-English reading of the study's rules. Only the study team can confirm whether you qualify.
What this trial studies
This multicenter randomized trial compares modified mini-percutaneous nephrolithotomy using a 20 Fr access sheath to standard PCNL using a 24 Fr sheath in adults with complex renal stones. Participants are about 1,380 patients at 8 urology centers who will be randomly assigned to one of the two procedures. Stone-free status is checked with a low-dose CT within 72 hours after surgery, with follow-up assessment at 3 months. The goal is to determine non-inferiority of the modified mini-PCNL in achieving stone clearance while potentially reducing surgical trauma and recovery burden. Additional outcomes include perioperative safety and recovery metrics.
Why it matters
Potential benefit: If successful, patients may experience similar stone clearance with less surgical trauma and quicker recovery.
How similar studies have gone: Previous PCNL studies have shown that smaller tracts can reduce tissue trauma without compromising stone clearance in selected cases, supporting this trial's approach.
Who can join: the full rules
Show full inclusion / exclusion criteria
Inclusion Criteria: 1. Adults aged ≥18 years. 2. Serum creatinine ≤133 μmol/L. 3. American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) physical status classification I-III. 4. S.T.O.N.E. score ≥8. 5. Complex renal stones confirmed by noncontrast computed tomography, including stone surface area \>1500 mm², multiple calyceal stones, partial or complete staghorn calculi, or complex anatomical conditions. 6. Patients who provide written informed consent and agree to undergo either modified mini-percutaneous nephrolithotomy or standard percutaneous nephrolithotomy. Exclusion Criteria: 1. Solitary kidney. 2. Morbid obesity (body mass index ≥35 kg/m²). 3. Previous renal transplantation or urinary diversion. 4. Congenital abnormalities of the urinary tract. 5. Pregnancy. 6. Uncorrected coagulopathy. 7. Active urinary tract infection.
Where it's running
-
The First Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University
Guangzhou, Guangdong, China Recruiting
Study contacts
- Study coordinator: Yongda Liu, Doctor
- Email: 13719007083@163.com
- Phone: +020-83062923
Similar studies
Other studies for the same condition or treatment. Recruiting studies are listed first.
-
Aspirating vs non-aspirating ureteral access sheath in RIRS for kidney stones
This trial tests whether using an aspirating ureteral access sheath during retrograde intrarenal surgery improves stone clearance and reduces complications compared with a non-aspirating sheath in adults with small kidney stones.
-
Suction to collapse the kidney's collecting system after RIRS (retrograde intrarenal surgery)
This trial will test whether actively suctioning the kidney's collecting system at the end of RIRS reduces early postoperative pain and infections for adults having kidney stone removal.
-
Compare two suction ureteroscope devices for kidney stones (FANS vs CVAC)
This study tests whether two new suction-enabled ureteroscopes (FANS and CVAC) lead to better stone clearance for adults with small to medium kidney stones compared to each other.
-
Negative-pressure suction during flexible ureteroscopy to reduce fluid absorption and infections
This test will see if using a negative-pressure suction sheath during retrograde intrarenal surgery for adults with kidney stones reduces how much irrigation fluid their bodies absorb and lowers the risk of postoperative infections.
-
Outcomes and costs with the HugeMed 6.3 Fr flexible ureteroscope
This trial will test whether the HugeMed 6.3 Fr flexible ureteroscope gives similar stone-free results while lowering costs compared with traditional flexible ureteroscopes in adults having RIRS for stones up to 2.5 cm.
-
MODULITH SLX-F2 shockwave treatment with StorM-Track versus standard targeting for kidney stones
This will test if using StorM-Track real-time stone tracking with the MODULITH SLX-F2 shockwave machine helps adults with 6–15 mm kidney stones become stone-free more often than standard shockwave treatment.
How to take part
- Review the eligibility criteria above with your treating physician.
- Check the official listing on ClinicalTrials.gov for the latest contact details and recruitment status.
- Contact the study coordinator or principal investigator to ask for pre-screening. Pre-screening is free and never obligates you to enroll.