Milled vs 3D-Printed Partial-Coverage Restorations in Endodontically Treated Molars
Official title: Clinical Performance of CAD/CAM-Milled Versus 3D-Printed Composite Resin Partial-Coverage Restorations for Endodontically Treated Molars: A Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial
Run by Hospital San Jose · NCT07643311 · Data updated 2026-11-12
This study tests whether 3D-printed composite resin partial-coverage restorations perform as well as CAD/CAM-milled restorations in molars that have had root canal treatment.
Quick facts
| Study type | Interventional |
|---|---|
| Ages | 18 Years to 70 Years |
| Sex | All |
| Enrollment | 142 (estimated) |
| Sponsor | Hospital San Jose Academic / other |
| Locations | 1 site (Santiago, Santiago Metropolitan) |
| Status | Recruiting |
| Started | May 29, 2026 |
| Main results expected | May 31, 2030 |
| Study ends | June 30, 2030 |
| Registry record updated | June 11, 2026 |
| Trial ID | NCT07643311 on ClinicalTrials.gov |
Is this trial a fit for you?
✓Likely a good fit
Adults aged 18 to 70 with endodontically treated first molars needing partial-coverage restorations (onlay or overlay) and meeting good oral hygiene criteria.
✕Probably not a fit
Patients outside the age range, with active periodontal disease or poor oral hygiene, or those not meeting follow-up requirements may not experience a benefit.
A plain-English reading of the study's rules. Only the study team can confirm whether you qualify.
What this trial studies
This randomized controlled trial compares two fabrication methods for indirect composite resin restorations (onlays/overlays) in endodontically treated molars. All restorations are made using a fully digital workflow, with standardized tooth preparation, bonding, and cementation, and follow-up visits at 12, 24, and 36 months. Outcomes will include survival, success rates, and potential complications, using internationally accepted criteria. The study takes place at Hospital San José in Santiago, Chile, and uses commercially available materials from additive and subtractive manufacturing. The goal is to determine if 3D-printed restorations can provide clinical results comparable to milled restorations over medium-term follow-up.
Why it matters
Potential benefit: If successful, patients could benefit from accurate, efficient, and possibly more flexible restoration options using 3D-printing technology.
How similar studies have gone: Previous work in CAD/CAM versus additive manufacturing for dental restorations has shown mixed results; this study adds medium-term randomized data in a specific molar context.
Who can join: the full rules
Show full inclusion / exclusion criteria
Inclusion Criteria: * Adults aged 18 to 70 years * Absence of active periodontal disease * Good oral hygiene (O'Leary plaque index \<20%) * Absence of parafunctional habits (e.g., bruxism, onychophagia) * Endodontically treated first molars (maxillary or mandibular) with extensive Class II cavities and loss of at least one cusp, requiring onlay or overlay restoration * Tooth with functional occlusal contact and at least one proximal contact * Referred from the Endodontics Department of Hospital San José, with endodontic treatment completed at the same institution * Ability to provide written informed consent * Ability to attend follow-up visits at 12, 24, and 36 months Exclusion Criteria: * Untreated active periodontal disease * Poor oral hygiene (O'Leary plaque index ≥20%) * Generalized active caries * Active parafunctional habits * Teeth with complete circumferential structural destruction or insufficient coronal tooth structure for onlay/overlay restoration * Subgingival margins compromising the biologic width * Known allergy to study materials * Pregnancy or breastfeeding
Where it's running
-
Hospital San José
Santiago, Santiago Metropolitan, Chile Recruiting
Study contacts
- Principal investigator: Tomás Yoma Galleguillos, DDS — Hospital San José, Santiago, Chile
- Study coordinator: Tomás Yoma Galleguillos, DDS
- Email: tomasyoma@gmail.com
- Phone: +56985768407
Similar studies
Other studies for the same condition or treatment. Recruiting studies are listed first.
-
Conservative Overlay Restoration vs Conventional Crown for Endodontically Treated Back Teeth
This study tests whether a conservative lithium disilicate overlay with a fiber-reinforced composite core can protect root canal treated back teeth as well as the traditional fiber post, core, and full-coverage crown.
-
3D-printed hybrid resin versus CAD/CAM composite overlays for endodontically treated molars
This will test whether 3D-printed hybrid resin restorations or milled CAD/CAM composite restorations—using one of two cementation methods—work better for restoring endodontically treated molars.
-
Onlays made from different 3D‑printable resins for root‑canal treated molars
This study will test if onlays printed from three different resin materials perform well on molar teeth that have had root canal treatment.
-
Restoring endodontically treated teeth using different techniques
This study is testing three different ways to restore back teeth that have had root canal treatment to see which one works best for people with significant tooth damage.
-
Using light therapy to reduce pain and improve healing after dental surgery
This study is testing whether light therapy can help reduce pain and speed up healing for people who have just had dental surgery.
-
Evaluating the success of different root canal sealers in dental treatment
This study is testing whether two different root canal sealers can help people with serious tooth problems get better results from their dental treatments.
How to take part
- Review the eligibility criteria above with your treating physician.
- Check the official listing on ClinicalTrials.gov for the latest contact details and recruitment status.
- Contact the study coordinator or principal investigator to ask for pre-screening. Pre-screening is free and never obligates you to enroll.