Kaltenborn vs Maitland Mobilization for Cervicogenic Headache
Official title: "Effectiveness of Kaltenborn Mobilization Techniques Versus Maitland Mobilization on Management of Cervicogenic Headache: A Randomized Controlled Trial."
Run by Ibadat International University, Islamabad · NCT07820280 · Data updated 2026-11-12
This trial tests whether Kaltenborn mobilization helps people with cervicogenic headache more than Maitland mobilization.
Quick facts
| Study type | Interventional |
|---|---|
| Ages | 18 Years to 40 Years |
| Sex | All |
| Enrollment | 44 (estimated) |
| Sponsor | Ibadat International University, Islamabad Academic / other |
| Locations | 1 site (Islamabad) |
| Status | Recruiting |
| Started | March 20, 2026 |
| Main results expected | September 28, 2026 |
| Study ends | September 30, 2026 |
| Registry record updated | September 21, 2026 |
| Trial ID | NCT07820280 on ClinicalTrials.gov |
Is this trial a fit for you?
✓Likely a good fit
Adults aged 18-40 with clinically confirmed cervicogenic headache and unilateral neck pain who meet the inclusion criteria.
✕Probably not a fit
Individuals outside the age range, with other types of headaches, or with conditions excluding participation may not benefit.
A plain-English reading of the study's rules. Only the study team can confirm whether you qualify.
What this trial studies
Adults (18-40) with cervicogenic headache are randomly assigned to Kaltenborn or Maitland mobilization for 8 weeks (three sessions per week) after baseline physiotherapy. The study measures pain intensity, cervical range of motion, neck disability, and headache-related disability to compare the two techniques. Forty-four participants will be split into two groups to determine which mobilization approach provides greater relief and functional improvement. The findings aim to guide physiotherapists in choosing an effective mobilization technique for this condition.
Why it matters
Potential benefit: If Kaltenborn mobilization proves more effective, patients may experience greater pain relief and improved neck function.
How similar studies have gone: Previous studies with manual mobilization techniques show mixed but promising results for cervicogenic headache.
Who can join: the full rules
Show full inclusion / exclusion criteria
Inclusion Criteria: * Age: 18-40 yrs * Gender: male/female * Unilateral neck pain and stiffness * Cervicogenic headache confirmed with Cervical Flexion Rotation Test * Cervical spine ROM\>10° * Unilateral headache * Headache triggered on neck extension Exclusion Criteria: * Congenital conditions of cervical spine * Disc herniation * Cervical radiculopathy * Myelopathy * Cervical fracture/ trauma past 3 months * Vestibular dysfunction/ VBI * TMJ dysfunction related headache * Whiplash injury * Other types of headache i-e tension type, migraine or cluster type
Where it's running
-
Ibadat International University
Islamabad, Pakistan Recruiting
Study contacts
- Principal investigator: Marium Khalid, Ms-OMPT — Ibadat International University, Islamabad
- Study coordinator: Marium Khalid, MS-OMPT
- Email: drmariumkhalid.pt@gmail.com
- Phone: 03341510369
Similar studies
Other studies for the same condition or treatment. Recruiting studies are listed first.
-
Post Isometric Relaxation vs Reciprocal Inhibition for Cervicogenic Headache
This study tests whether two gentle neck muscle techniques, post isometric relaxation and reciprocal inhibition, help people with cervicogenic headache more than a standard physical therapy routine.
-
Physical profile of cervicogenic headache vs neck pain and healthy people
This observational study tests whether posture, grip strength, muscle stiffness, elasticity, and pressure sensitivity differ among people with cervicogenic headache, chronic neck pain, and healthy controls.
-
Osteopathic manipulation versus physiotherapy for cervicocranial symptoms
This will test whether osteopathic manipulative treatment or standard physiotherapy reduces dizziness, headaches, and neck pain better in adults with cervicocranial dysfunction.
-
Comparing two hands-on neck therapies for cervicogenic headache
This will try Mulligan mobilization and myofascial release, each with a home exercise program, to see which helps adults aged 18–65 who have had cervicogenic (neck-origin) headache for at least three months.
-
Third occipital nerve pulsed radiofrequency for cervicogenic headache
This trial will test whether ultrasound-guided pulsed radiofrequency of the third occipital nerve reduces pain in adults with cervicogenic headache who responded to a diagnostic nerve block.
-
Steroid injection into neck muscle trigger points versus C2 dorsal root ganglion (nerve) block for chronic cervicogenic headache
This trial will test whether steroid injections into neck myofascial trigger points work as well as C2 dorsal root ganglion (nerve) blocks to reduce pain in adults with chronic cervicogenic headache.
How to take part
- Review the eligibility criteria above with your treating physician.
- Check the official listing on ClinicalTrials.gov for the latest contact details and recruitment status.
- Contact the study coordinator or principal investigator to ask for pre-screening. Pre-screening is free and never obligates you to enroll.