Incremental Instrumental Dead Space vs Capping Trial Before Removing a Tracheostomy
Official title: Incremental Dead Space Versus Capping Trial to Predict the Post-Decannulation Respiratory Status in Tracheostomized Critically Ill Patients: A Physiological Randomized Crossover Study
Run by Pontificia Universidad Catolica de Chile · NCT07810166 · Data updated 2026-11-12
This study tests whether adding extra tubing to the ventilator circuit (without blocking the tube) helps decide when a patient is ready to breathe on their own after a tracheostomy better than the standard capping trial.
Quick facts
| Study type | Interventional |
|---|---|
| Ages | 18 Years and up |
| Sex | All |
| Enrollment | 22 (estimated) |
| Sponsor | Pontificia Universidad Catolica de Chile Academic / other |
| Locations | 1 site (Santiago, Santiago Metropolitan) |
| Status | Recruiting |
| Started | August 17, 2026 |
| Main results expected | December 2028 |
| Study ends | December 2028 |
| Registry record updated | September 9, 2026 |
| Trial ID | NCT07810166 on ClinicalTrials.gov |
Is this trial a fit for you?
✓Likely a good fit
Adults (≥18) in the ICU with a tracheostomy due to prolonged mechanical ventilation who are clinically ready for decannulation and can maintain spontaneous breathing for ≥48 hours.
✕Probably not a fit
Patients with neuromuscular diseases affecting respiratory muscles, severe hemodynamic instability, or those unable to cooperate may not benefit.
A plain-English reading of the study's rules. Only the study team can confirm whether you qualify.
What this trial studies
Critically ill adults with a tracheostomy who are ready to decannulate are randomized to two approaches: a standard capping trial or an incremental instrumental dead space setup that preserves an open airway. The goal is to see if the dead space method better predicts post-decannulation breathing ease by reducing airway resistance compared to the blocked-tube test. Researchers will monitor markers of respiratory effort, such as esophageal pressure-time product, and track decannulation outcomes. The study addresses whether a less obstructive assessment can shorten time to decannulation and reduce unnecessary delays. Safety monitoring and institutional criteria for decannulation remain in place as part of standard care.
Why it matters
Potential benefit: If successful, the dead space approach could allow safer and faster decannulation by more accurately predicting readiness.
How similar studies have gone: Previous physiological data suggest that alternative approaches to capping may reduce overestimation of breathing workload, but this specific dead space method is novel for decannulation readiness.
Who can join: the full rules
Show full inclusion / exclusion criteria
Inclusion Criteria: * Adult patients (≥18 years) admitted to the ICU. * Presence of a tracheostomy due to prolonged mechanical ventilation (≥14 days). * Clinically considered ready for decannulation, according to institutional criteria (e.g., stable gas exchange, minimal secretions, effective cough, and tolerance to spontaneous breathing). * Ability to maintain spontaneous breathing without mechanical ventilation for more than 48 consecutive hours. * Able to cooperate and follow basic commands (RASS between -1 and +1). * Written informed consent obtained from patient. Exclusion Criteria: * Neuromuscular disease affecting respiratory muscles (e.g., myasthenia gravis, Guillain-Barre syndrome, amyotrophic lateral sclerosis). * Hemodynamic instability. * Severe agitation or delirium precluding cooperation (RASS \< -2 or \> +2). * Structural airway abnormalities (e.g., subglottic stenosis, tracheomalacia). * Pregnancy. * Contraindications for esophageal balloon catheter insertion (e.g., severe coagulopathy, esophageal varices, and history of esophageal or gastric surgery). * Refusal to participate by the attending physician.
Where it's running
-
Hospital Clínico UC CHRISTUS, Unidad de Paciente Crítico
Santiago, Santiago Metropolitan, Chile Recruiting
Study contacts
- Study coordinator: Roque Basoalto Escobar, MSc, PhD
- Email: roque.basoalto@gmail.com
- Phone: +56984463575
Similar studies
Other studies for the same condition or treatment. Recruiting studies are listed first.
-
Structured education for families of patients with tracheostomy in the ICU
This trial tests whether giving a structured education session to family members of ICU patients with tracheostomies can reduce their state anxiety and improve well-being and satisfaction with care.
-
Use of invasive home ventilation in Denmark
This project will see how often people with neuromuscular diseases or spinal cord injuries in Denmark used invasive home mechanical ventilation between 2016 and 2025 and what their one-year outcomes were.
-
Powered lower-limb exoskeleton training for adults with prolonged mechanical ventilation
We are testing whether using a powered leg exoskeleton during training can improve leg strength, breathing measures, and recovery time for people who have been on a ventilator for a long period.
-
Bedside EIT-guided respiratory physiotherapy for adults on long-term ventilators
This trial will test whether using bedside electrical impedance tomography to guide respiratory physiotherapy helps adults who have been on a ventilator for 21 days or more get more days off the ventilator within the first 28 days.
-
How removing a tracheostomy affects breathing
This project will test three breathing checks—breathing through the tube, using a one-way speaking valve, and capping the tube—before and after removing a long-term tracheostomy in adults to see which best predicts safe removal.
-
Low blood creatinine as a sign of longer ventilator use and a target for creatine supplements
This project will test whether a low serum creatinine on admission predicts a longer need for mechanical ventilation and whether giving creatine supplements to post-ICU patients with low creatinine can shorten time on the ventilator.
How to take part
- Review the eligibility criteria above with your treating physician.
- Check the official listing on ClinicalTrials.gov for the latest contact details and recruitment status.
- Contact the study coordinator or principal investigator to ask for pre-screening. Pre-screening is free and never obligates you to enroll.