How removing a tracheostomy affects breathing
Official title: Study on the Impact of Tracheostomy Decannulation on Pulmonary Function in Adult Patients
Run by Capital Medical University · NCT07191509 · Data updated 2026-11-12
This project will test three breathing checks—breathing through the tube, using a one-way speaking valve, and capping the tube—before and after removing a long-term tracheostomy in adults to see which best predicts safe removal.
Quick facts
| Study type | Observational |
|---|---|
| Ages | 18 Years and up |
| Sex | All |
| Enrollment | 100 (estimated) |
| Sponsor | Capital Medical University Academic / other |
| Locations | 1 site (Beijing) |
| Status | Recruiting |
| Started | October 1, 2025 |
| Main results expected | September 30, 2026 |
| Study ends | December 31, 2026 |
| Registry record updated | March 11, 2026 |
| Trial ID | NCT07191509 on ClinicalTrials.gov |
Is this trial a fit for you?
✓Likely a good fit
Adults (≥18 years) with a stable primary illness who have a long-term tracheostomy, are scheduled for elective decannulation in the rehabilitation unit, can tolerate a one-way speaking valve for ≥4 hours, and can perform bedside spirometry and consent.
✕Probably not a fit
Patients who cannot perform lung-function testing, have unstable cardiopulmonary or neurologic conditions, require isolation precautions, or need immediate re-intubation/re-cannulation are unlikely to benefit.
A plain-English reading of the study's rules. Only the study team can confirm whether you qualify.
What this trial studies
This single-center prospective observational study enrolls adults with long-term tracheostomies who are scheduled for elective decannulation at a rehabilitation hospital in Beijing. Twenty-four hours before decannulation participants undergo three physiologic tests—breathing through the tracheostomy tube, breathing with a one-way speaking valve, and breathing with the tube capped—while standard pulmonary function tests and arterial blood gases are recorded. The same pulmonary and arterial measurements are repeated five days after the tube is removed. The study compares pre-decannulation test results to post-decannulation outcomes to identify which pre-test best predicts safe, successful decannulation and to describe changes in respiratory function after removal.
Why it matters
Potential benefit: If successful, clinicians could use the best-performing bedside test to reduce failed decannulations and related complications, making tube removal safer and more predictable for patients.
How similar studies have gone: Prior work using speaking valves, capping trials, and tube occlusion to predict decannulation outcomes has shown mixed but generally promising results, so this approach builds on existing, partially validated methods.
Who can join: the full rules
Show full inclusion / exclusion criteria
Inclusion Criteria: * Age ≥ 18 years. * Tracheostomised patient whose primary illness is stable and who is scheduled for elective decannulation in the rehabilitation unit. * Able to tolerate a one-way speaking valve for ≥ 4 h on the day before planned decannulation. * Capable of following instructions and completing bedside spirometry. * Patient (or legally authorised representative) has provided written informed consent. Exclusion Criteria: * No tracheostomy in place or requirement for re-intubation/re-cannulation after planned decannulation. * Inability to perform lung-function testing either via the tracheostomy tube or via the mouth/nose (e.g., severe upper-airway obstruction, facial deformity). * Unstable cardiopulmonary or neurological status that makes spirometry unsafe (e.g., ongoing myocardial ischemia, uncontrolled arrhythmia, severe agitation). * Any acute condition requiring isolation precautions that preclude study procedures. * Refusal or inability to sign informed consent. * Missing or incomplete key outcome data.
Where it's running
-
Beijing Rehabilitation Hospital, Capital Medical University
Beijing, China Recruiting
Study contacts
- Study coordinator: Jia Deng
- Email: djlm1028@126.com
- Phone: +8656981423
Similar studies
Other studies for the same condition or treatment. Recruiting studies are listed first.
-
Incremental Instrumental Dead Space vs Capping Trial Before Removing a Tracheostomy
This study tests whether adding extra tubing to the ventilator circuit (without blocking the tube) helps decide when a patient is ready to breathe on their own after a tracheostomy better than the standard capping trial.
-
Computed inspiratory muscle pressure to monitor inspiratory effort during pressure-targeted assist/control ventilation
This study tests a noninvasive computed pressure method (cPmus) to see if it matches the traditional esophageal pressure method for measuring inspiratory effort in adults on pressure-targeted ventilation with spontaneous breathing.
-
Noninvasive estimate of inspiratory effort to monitor pressure support ventilation
This study tests whether a noninvasive computed inspiratory muscle pressure (cPmus) can match the traditional esophageal pressure method for adults on pressure support ventilation.
-
Three-Minute Six-Dimension Education to Improve LLM-Powered Neurology Consultations
This study tests whether a brief three-minute, six-dimension education plan helps patients give better information so ChatGPT can aid neurology care.
-
Anticoagulation Plus Tocilizumab for Acute Cerebral Venous Thrombosis
This study tests whether adding a single dose of tocilizumab to standard blood thinners helps people with acute cerebral venous thrombosis.
-
Anisodine hydrobromide added to standard care for acute ischemic stroke patients undergoing thrombectomy
In people with acute ischemic stroke who are getting endovascular treatment, this study tests whether anisodine hydrobromide plus standard care helps more than standard care plus a placebo.
How to take part
- Review the eligibility criteria above with your treating physician.
- Check the official listing on ClinicalTrials.gov for the latest contact details and recruitment status.
- Contact the study coordinator or principal investigator to ask for pre-screening. Pre-screening is free and never obligates you to enroll.