Clinical trial Recruiting at 1 site Observational Ages 18 and up

How to best place stimulating electrodes for the ulnar nerve in the wrist and how this compares to using anatomical landmarks

Official title: Comparison of Ultrasound and Anatomic Landmark Techniques of the Ulnar and Posterior Tibial Nerves

Run by Mayo Clinic · NCT07515911 · Data updated 2026-11-12

This study tests whether lining up the stimulating electrode over the ulnar nerve using simple wrist measurements improves stimulation of the intrinsic hand muscles compared with landmark-based methods.

Quick facts

Study typeObservational
Ages18 Years and up
SexAll
Enrollment40 (estimated)
SponsorMayo Clinic
Academic / other
Locations1 site (Jacksonville, Florida)
StatusRecruiting
StartedSeptember 2, 2026
Main results expectedJanuary 2027
Study endsJanuary 2027
Registry record updatedSeptember 17, 2026
Trial IDNCT07515911 on ClinicalTrials.gov

Is this trial a fit for you?

Likely a good fit

English-speaking adults without a history of ulnar neuropathy or previous ulnar nerve/wrist surgery and without upper extremity edema.

Probably not a fit

Patients with prior ulnar nerve pathology or wrist surgery may not experience improved electrode placement from this approach.

A plain-English reading of the study's rules. Only the study team can confirm whether you qualify.

What this trial studies

This observational study from Mayo Clinic Jacksonville compares two approaches to placing stimulating electrodes over the ulnar nerve: ultrasound-guided or anatomic landmark positioning. The goal is to see if accurate nerve localization improves current delivery to the intrinsic hand muscles. Researchers will use hand and possibly foot/ankle measurements to guide electrode placement and will assess accuracy against a reference standard. The study aims to identify a simple, reliable description of wrist anatomy, such as a fraction of wrist width, that practitioners can use in routine care. It is expected to estimate nerve location within about 10% of total wrist width when the ulnar groove is clearly identified.

Why it matters

Potential benefit: If successful, clinicians may place stimulating electrodes more accurately and quickly, potentially improving nerve stimulation outcomes.

How similar studies have gone: Previous work suggests that anatomical landmarks can guide nerve localization, but this study explores whether simple wrist measurements can enhance accuracy, making the approach somewhat novel.

Who can join: the full rules

Show full inclusion / exclusion criteria
Inclusion Criteria:

• English speaking

Exclusion Criteria:

* History of ulnar neuropathy or ulnar nerve or wrist surgery (i.e. carpal tunnel)
* Upper extremity edema

Where it's running

  • Mayo Clinic
    Jacksonville, Florida, United States
    Recruiting

Study contacts

Similar studies

Other studies for the same condition or treatment. Recruiting studies are listed first.

How to take part

  1. Review the eligibility criteria above with your treating physician.
  2. Check the official listing on ClinicalTrials.gov for the latest contact details and recruitment status.
  3. Contact the study coordinator or principal investigator to ask for pre-screening. Pre-screening is free and never obligates you to enroll.
Browse more
Last reviewed 2026-11-14 by the Find a Trial editorial team. Information on this page is for educational purposes and is not medical advice. Always consult qualified healthcare professionals about clinical trial participation.