Edoxaban vs. Apixaban in AF with CAD: Net Benefit
Official title: Net Clinical Benefit of Edoxaban Versus Apixaban in Patients With Atrial Fibrillation and Coronary Artery Disease
Run by Samsung Medical Center · NCT07753200 · Data updated 2026-11-12
This trial tests whether edoxaban-based therapy provides a similar or better overall benefit than apixaban-based therapy for stroke prevention and major bleeding in adults with atrial fibrillation and coronary artery disease.
Quick facts
| Phase | Phase 4 |
|---|---|
| Study type | Interventional |
| Ages | 19 Years and up |
| Sex | All |
| Enrollment | 3000 (estimated) |
| Sponsor | Samsung Medical Center Academic / other |
| Locations | 1 site (Seoul) |
| Status | Recruiting |
| Started | July 20, 2026 |
| Main results expected | June 1, 2031 |
| Study ends | December 31, 2031 |
| Registry record updated | August 10, 2026 |
| Trial ID | NCT07753200 on ClinicalTrials.gov |
Is this trial a fit for you?
✓Likely a good fit
Adults 19+ with atrial fibrillation requiring anticoagulation and documented CAD, able to consent, and without contraindications to either study drug.
✕Probably not a fit
Patients with severe renal impairment, active major bleeding, non-cardiac comorbidities limiting life expectancy, or indications requiring a different anticoagulant may not benefit.
A plain-English reading of the study's rules. Only the study team can confirm whether you qualify.
What this trial studies
This phase 4, interventional trial compares two NOACs, edoxaban and apixaban, in patients who have atrial fibrillation plus coronary artery disease. The objective is to determine whether edoxaban offers a non-inferior net adverse clinical events balance compared with apixaban. Participants must be at least 19 years old and require oral anticoagulation for AF, with documented CAD, and must meet specified renal and bleeding criteria. The study will assess thromboembolism, bleeding, and other clinical outcomes to inform anticoagulation choices in this high-risk population. Samsung Medical Center leads the study with no listed collaborators, and the setting is Seoul, Korea.
Why it matters
Potential benefit: If edoxaban shows non-inferiority or superiority, patients may have alternative dosing options and potentially different bleeding and thromboembolism risks that could influence anticoagulation decisions.
How similar studies have gone: Direct comparisons between edoxaban and apixaban in AF with CAD are limited, making this a relatively novel evaluation in this specific population.
Who can join: the full rules
Show full inclusion / exclusion criteria
Inclusion Criteria: * Patients must be at least 19 years of age * Patients with AF requiring oral anticoagulation therapy (CHA2DS2-VaSc 2 or more) * Documented coronary artery disease, defined as at least one of the following: history of percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), history of coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG), major epicardial coronary artery stenosis ≥50% on coronary computed tomography angiography (CCTA) or invasive coronary angiography * Patients who can understand risks, benefits and treatment alternatives and sign informed consent voluntarily. Exclusion Criteria: * Known hypersensitivity or contraindications to study medications (apixaban or edoxaban) * Severe renal impairment (creatinine clearance \<15 mL/min) or dialysis * Active major bleeding * Indication requiring alternative anticoagulation (e.g., mechanical valve surgery or moderate / severe mitral stenosis) * Non-cardiac co-morbid conditions are present with life expectancy \<1 year or that may result in protocol non-compliance (per site investigator's medical judgment) * Pregnant or lactating women
Where it's running
-
Samsung Medical Center
Seoul, South Korea Recruiting
Study contacts
- Principal investigator: Joo-yong Hahn, MD, PhD — Samsung Medical Center
- Study coordinator: Joo-Yong Hahn, MD, PhD
- Email: Jooyong.hahn@gmail.com
- Phone: 82-2-3410-6653
Similar studies
Other studies for the same condition or treatment. Recruiting studies are listed first.
-
Integrated care for older patients with atrial fibrillation
This study is testing a new team-based care approach for older patients with atrial fibrillation and other health issues to see if it helps them manage their condition better than regular care.
-
Pulsed Field vs Cryoballoon for Pulmonary Vein Isolation in Atrial Fibrillation
This trial tests whether pulsed field ablation can shorten the procedure for first-time PVI in AF patients compared with cryoballoon ablation, while keeping safety and effectiveness similar.
-
Pulsed Field Ablation vs Cryoablation for Atrial Fibrillation Under Deep Sedation
This trial tests whether pulsed field ablation (PFA) done under deep sedation works as well as cryoballoon ablation for treating atrial fibrillation, aiming to avoid general anesthesia.
-
Bachmann’s Bundle Pacing vs Right Atrial Appendage Pacing for AF
This study tests two common atrial pacing methods to see which one is safer over 12 months for people getting a new pacemaker, ICD, or CRT device.
-
AI-powered ECG to help diagnose and predict outcomes in heart disease
Researchers test an AI-enhanced ECG to help diagnose and predict outcomes for people with cardiovascular diseases.
-
Pace-and-ablate strategy in atrial fibrillation: who benefits and long-term outcomes
This study looks at adults with atrial fibrillation who underwent AV node ablation with permanent pacing to see who develops pacing-induced problems and how they do long-term.
How to take part
- Review the eligibility criteria above with your treating physician.
- Check the official listing on ClinicalTrials.gov for the latest contact details and recruitment status.
- Contact the study coordinator or principal investigator to ask for pre-screening. Pre-screening is free and never obligates you to enroll.