Pulsed Field vs Cryoballoon for Pulmonary Vein Isolation in Atrial Fibrillation
Official title: Structured Treatment and Resource Efficiency Assessment With Lean Six Sigma Integration for Pulmonary Vein Isolation
Run by St. Josefs-Hospital Wiesbaden GmbH · NCT07910370 · Data updated 2026-11-12
This trial tests whether pulsed field ablation can shorten the procedure for first-time PVI in AF patients compared with cryoballoon ablation, while keeping safety and effectiveness similar.
Quick facts
| Study type | Interventional |
|---|---|
| Ages | 18 Years and up |
| Sex | All |
| Enrollment | 94 (estimated) |
| Sponsor | St. Josefs-Hospital Wiesbaden GmbH Academic / other |
| Locations | 1 site (Wiesbaden) |
| Status | Recruiting |
| Started | October 26, 2026 |
| Main results expected | October 31, 2027 |
| Study ends | November 30, 2027 |
| Registry record updated | November 2, 2026 |
| Trial ID | NCT07910370 on ClinicalTrials.gov |
Is this trial a fit for you?
✓Likely a good fit
Adults with atrial fibrillation diagnosed within the past two years who are scheduled for a first-time PVI.
✕Probably not a fit
Patients with prior AF ablation, significant heart failure with reduced EF, or other exclusion criteria may not benefit from this approach.
A plain-English reading of the study's rules. Only the study team can confirm whether you qualify.
What this trial studies
STREAMLINE-PVI is a prospective, single-center, randomized study that compares two ablation methods for atrial fibrillation. Ninety-four adults undergoing first-time PVI are randomized 1:1 to pulsed field ablation or cryoballoon ablation within Lean Six Sigma–optimized workflows. The trial's primary goal is to see if PFA reduces total procedure time by at least 20% without sacrificing safety or efficacy. Secondary outcomes include recovery time, readiness for same-day discharge, atrial arrhythmia recurrence and AF burden, and procedural complications over a 12-month follow-up. The study is conducted at St. Josefs-Hospital Wiesbaden with the sponsor overseeing the protocol.
Why it matters
Potential benefit: If successful, patients could experience shorter procedures and faster recovery without increased risk or reduced effectiveness.
How similar studies have gone: Previous work in ablation methods has shown promise with alternative energy sources, but direct head-to-head randomized data in this setting are limited.
Who can join: the full rules
Show full inclusion / exclusion criteria
Inclusion Criteria: * Age ≥18 years * Willingness to participate and ability to provide informed consent * Atrial fibrillation diagnosed within the past 2 years * Scheduled for first-time pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) Exclusion Criteria: * Previous catheter ablation for atrial fibrillation * Reversible cause of atrial fibrillation (e.g., thyrotoxicosis, alcohol ingestion) * Coexisting non-pulmonary vein-dependent atrial tachycardia * Heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (LVEF ≤40%) * Indication for pacemaker or implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) implantation * Severe mitral stenosis or regurgitation, or previous mitral valve repair or replacement * Known intracardiac thrombus formation despite continuous oral anticoagulation for more than 4 weeks * Incessant ventricular tachycardia * Surgical coronary revascularization within the previous 30 days * Myocardial infarction within the previous 30 days * Ongoing triple antithrombotic therapy following percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) * Contraindication to contrast media * Contraindication to oral anticoagulation * Body mass index (BMI) \>35 kg/m² * Inability to provide written informed consent * Life expectancy \<12 months
Where it's running
-
St. Josefs-Hospital Wiesbaden
Wiesbaden, Germany Recruiting
Study contacts
- Study coordinator: Joachim R Ehrlich, Prof. Dr.
- Email: jehrlich@joho.de
- Phone: +49 611 1771200
Similar studies
Other studies for the same condition or treatment. Recruiting studies are listed first.
-
Pulsed Field Ablation vs Cryoablation for Atrial Fibrillation Under Deep Sedation
This trial tests whether pulsed field ablation (PFA) done under deep sedation works as well as cryoballoon ablation for treating atrial fibrillation, aiming to avoid general anesthesia.
-
Bachmann’s Bundle Pacing vs Right Atrial Appendage Pacing for AF
This study tests two common atrial pacing methods to see which one is safer over 12 months for people getting a new pacemaker, ICD, or CRT device.
-
AI-powered ECG to help diagnose and predict outcomes in heart disease
Researchers test an AI-enhanced ECG to help diagnose and predict outcomes for people with cardiovascular diseases.
-
Pace-and-ablate strategy in atrial fibrillation: who benefits and long-term outcomes
This study looks at adults with atrial fibrillation who underwent AV node ablation with permanent pacing to see who develops pacing-induced problems and how they do long-term.
-
AI-based cardiac analysis using 12-lead and 1-lead ECG
A clinician-facing pilot test to see if SmartECG-EF helps evaluate heart function using both 12-lead and single-lead ECGs in adults with heart conditions.
-
Long-term half-dose apixaban versus aspirin after Watchman implantation
This trial tests whether continuing a half-dose blood thinner (apixaban) is better than aspirin after Watchman device implantation in people with atrial fibrillation.
How to take part
- Review the eligibility criteria above with your treating physician.
- Check the official listing on ClinicalTrials.gov for the latest contact details and recruitment status.
- Contact the study coordinator or principal investigator to ask for pre-screening. Pre-screening is free and never obligates you to enroll.