Eating with the clock: trying 8-hour eating windows during cancer treatment
Official title: Effect of Meal Timing During Adjuvant Treatment for Cancer: A Randomized Clinical Trial
Run by Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center · NCT07524218 · Data updated 2026-11-12
This study tests whether a time-restricted 8-hour eating window during adjuvant cancer therapy can improve treatment response and patient well-being for adults with solid tumors.
Quick facts
| Study type | Interventional |
|---|---|
| Ages | 18 Years and up |
| Sex | All |
| Enrollment | 50 (estimated) |
| Sponsor | Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center Academic / other |
| Drugs / interventions | chemotherapy, immunotherapy, radiation |
| Locations | 1 site (Los Angeles, California) |
| Status | Recruiting |
| Started | August 12, 2026 |
| Main results expected | August 31, 2029 |
| Study ends | August 31, 2029 |
| Registry record updated | August 25, 2026 |
| Trial ID | NCT07524218 on ClinicalTrials.gov |
Is this trial a fit for you?
✓Likely a good fit
Adults 18 years or older with solid tumors treated with curative-intent surgery who are about to begin systemic adjuvant therapy.
✕Probably not a fit
Patients who cannot adhere to the eating-window protocol or who do not undergo adjuvant therapy may not benefit.
A plain-English reading of the study's rules. Only the study team can confirm whether you qualify.
What this trial studies
Participants with solid tumors undergoing curative surgery and starting adjuvant therapy are randomized to either an 8-hour time-restricted eating window or a 12-plus hour eating window for about six months. Researchers track eating times, meal frequency, and intake with surveys, 3-day records, and continuous glucose monitoring, while offering weekly nutrition coaching. The trial uses sleep time to anchor the eating window and does not prescribe calories or meal counts beyond the window. Outcomes focus on treatment tolerance, metabolic health, and patient-reported well-being. The study is conducted with leading institutions and collaborators to explore a practical dietary approach during cancer care.
Why it matters
Potential benefit: If successful, this approach could offer a simple, scalable way to support treatment effectiveness and patient well-being.
How similar studies have gone: Prior research suggests fasting-related strategies may enhance cancer treatment effects and reduce toxicity, but results vary and this is a contemporary examination in the adjuvant setting.
Who can join: the full rules
Show full inclusion / exclusion criteria
Inclusion Criteria: * Age ≥18 years (no upper age limit) * Any sex or gender * Histologically or cytologically confirmed solid tumor treated with curative-intent surgical resection and planned initiation of systemic adjuvant therapy (chemotherapy, targeted therapy, immunotherapy, and/or radiation per standard of care) * BMI ≥18.5 kg/m2 * Willing and able to adhere to the assessments, visit schedules, prohibitions, and restrictions Exclusion Criteria: * No plan for systemic adjuvant therapy after surgery * Strictly adhering to a \<10-hour eating window on most days * Regular overnight shift work (≥1 night shift per week) * Dependent on parenteral or enteral nutrition * Pregnant or breastfeeding * Active second malignancy requiring systemic therapy (exceptions: non-melanoma skin cancers or in situ cervical cancers adequately treated) * Severe psychiatric, cognitive, or social conditions that would interfere with adherence to study procedures
Where it's running
-
Cedars Sinai Medical Center (CSMC)
Los Angeles, California, United States Recruiting
Study contacts
- Principal investigator: Jane Figueiredo, PhD — Cedars-Sinai Medical Center
- Study coordinator: Jane Figueiredo, PhD
- Email: Jane.Figueiredo@cshs.org
- Phone: (310) 423-2746
Similar studies
Other studies for the same condition or treatment. Recruiting studies are listed first.
-
Gyrotonic exercise for elders with breast cancer and Behcet disease
We’re testing whether a gyrotonic exercise program helps older people who have both Behcet disease and breast cancer.
-
PECS II vs SPSIP nerve blocks for pain after mastectomy
This study tests whether two ultrasound-guided nerve blocks (PECS II and SPSIP) differ in how much opioid patients need after mastectomy.
-
CG-7321: a first-in-human test in advanced solid tumors
We’re testing CG-7321 alone and with fulvestrant to see if it’s safe and tolerable in adults with advanced solid tumors.
-
Compare a new endoscopy-assisted breast-conserving surgery with the usual approach
This study tests whether a new endoscopy-assisted breast-conserving technique can provide similar or better cosmetic outcomes and safety compared with conventional breast-conserving surgery in women with early breast cancer who want to preserve their breast.
-
Different skin care approaches to prevent skin reactions after mastectomy radiation
This study tests three standard skin care methods to see which best prevents radiation dermatitis in people who had a mastectomy and are receiving post-mastectomy radiation therapy.
-
3D Heart Strain to Detect Early Cardiotoxicity in Cancer Therapy
This study tests whether 3D echocardiography can detect early heart damage from cancer treatments like anthracyclines or HER2-targeted therapy better than standard 2D methods.
How to take part
- Review the eligibility criteria above with your treating physician.
- Check the official listing on ClinicalTrials.gov for the latest contact details and recruitment status.
- Contact the study coordinator or principal investigator to ask for pre-screening. Pre-screening is free and never obligates you to enroll.