E-IodoCal paste vs ZOE in primary molar pulpectomies
Official title: Clinical and Radiographic Evaluation of E-IodoCal as Root Canal Filling Material in Primary Molars
Run by Tanta University · NCT07883200 · Data updated 2026-11-12
This randomized split-mouth trial tests whether E-IodoCal paste works as well as ZOE paste for filling root canals in primary molars of children aged 4 to 8.
Quick facts
| Study type | Interventional |
|---|---|
| Ages | 4 Years to 8 Years |
| Sex | All |
| Enrollment | 30 (estimated) |
| Sponsor | Tanta University Academic / other |
| Locations | 1 site (Tanta) |
| Status | Recruiting |
| Started | November 25, 2025 |
| Main results expected | November 2026 |
| Study ends | December 2026 |
| Registry record updated | October 22, 2026 |
| Trial ID | NCT07883200 on ClinicalTrials.gov |
Is this trial a fit for you?
✓Likely a good fit
Healthy children aged 4–8 with nonvital mandibular primary second molars suitable for pulpectomy and two-thirds root structure intact.
✕Probably not a fit
Children with non-restorable teeth, extensive mobility, systemic illness, or other exclusion criteria may not benefit.
A plain-English reading of the study's rules. Only the study team can confirm whether you qualify.
What this trial studies
Sixty non-vital mandibular primary second molars in cooperative children aged 4–8 are randomly assigned to receive either E-IodoCal or ZOE as root canal obturation after standard chemo-mechanical preparation. Teeth are restored with stainless steel crowns and followed for 9 months with clinical and radiographic checks for pain, swelling, sinus tracts, mobility, and periapical radiolucencies. Outcomes are assessed at 3, 6, and 9 months to compare success rates between the two materials. The study uses a randomized controlled, split-mouth design to reduce patient-level variation. Primary aim is to determine if E-IodoCal provides comparable clinical and radiographic results to ZOE in pediatric pulpectomies.
Why it matters
Potential benefit: If successful, E-IodoCal could offer an effective alternative root canal filling material for primary teeth.
How similar studies have gone: Prior studies in similar pediatric endodontic comparisons have shown meaningful differences in material performance, but this study addresses a novel paste formulation.
Who can join: the full rules
Show full inclusion / exclusion criteria
Inclusion Criteria: Clinical: - * Healthy cooperative children with an age range of 4 - 8 years. * Nonvital deep carious mandibular primary second molars with sufficient coronal structure and at least 2/3rd root structure intact. * Pulp exposure where bleeding couldn't be stopped following removal of the coronal pulp tissue * Previous history of irreversible pulpitis signs and symptoms as spontaneous pain, percussion sensitivity, fistulous tract related to the involved tooth, and pathologic tooth mobility (grade-I mobility) Radiographic: * Adequate alveolar bone support (coverage by the bone of minimum two- thirds of at least one root). * Presence of interradicular radiolucency (discontinuity of lamina dura and/or furcation involvement less than or equal to half of the shortest root). Exclusion Criteria: Clinical: * Non-restorable primary molars with severe mobility (greater than grade-I mobility). * Children with systemic illness (any medically compromising condition). * Primary molars beyond possible repair. Radiographic: * Extensive internal resorption. * Extensive external pathological root resorption. * Obliteration of the root canal. * Physiological root resorption of more than a third of its length.
Where it's running
-
faculty of dentistry, Tanta university
Tanta, Egypt Recruiting
Study contacts
- Study coordinator: shaimaa eldesouky, assistant professor
- Email: shaimaaeldesouky@dent.tanta.edu.eg
- Phone: 01008994242
Similar studies
Other studies for the same condition or treatment. Recruiting studies are listed first.
-
Comparison of two ways to numb a child's jaw during a root canal in the back teeth
This study tests whether digital anesthesia works as well as the traditional nerve block for numbing kids' lower back teeth during emergency root canals.
-
Treating infected non-vital baby molars with a zinc oxide/6-gingerol mix versus a triple antibiotic paste
This trial will test whether a zinc oxide/6-gingerol mix or a triple antibiotic paste better cleans and heals infected non-vital primary molars in children aged 4 to 8.
-
Pulpotomy versus root canal for painful lower premolars and molars
This study will see if total pulpotomy, radicular pulpotomy, or root canal treatment best controls postoperative pain and leads to successful outcomes for people aged 15–45 with symptomatic irreversible pulpitis in mandibular premolars and molars.
-
Using pre-operative findings and AI to predict whether full pulpotomy will succeed in painful mature molars
We will test whether pre-surgery clinical signs and an AI read of dental X-rays can predict if full pulpotomy will work for adults with irreversible pulpitis in mature molars.
-
Menstrual phase and how well lower-jaw dental anesthesia works
This research will test whether different menstrual cycle phases change how well an inferior alveolar nerve block works for women (20–40) with painful irreversible pulpitis in lower molars.
-
How French dentists treat infected or non-vital baby (primary) teeth
See how dentists in France treat children’s non-vital or infected primary teeth and what leads them to choose extraction, pulpectomy, or other options.
How to take part
- Review the eligibility criteria above with your treating physician.
- Check the official listing on ClinicalTrials.gov for the latest contact details and recruitment status.
- Contact the study coordinator or principal investigator to ask for pre-screening. Pre-screening is free and never obligates you to enroll.