Double-layer vaginal vault closure with self-locking versus traditional sutures after laparoscopic hysterectomy for gynecologic cancer

Comparison Between Double-Layer Self-Locking and Traditional Sutures in Post-Hysterectomy Laparoscopic Colporrhaphy: A Multicenter Pragmatic Randomized Controlled Trial

Not applicable Interventional Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Parma · NCT07313839

This trial tests whether double-layer self-locking (barbed) sutures reduce vaginal cuff complications compared with traditional Polyglactin 910 sutures in adults having laparoscopic or robotic hysterectomy for gynecologic cancer.

Quick facts

PhaseNot applicable
Study typeInterventional
Enrollment310 (estimated)
Ages18 Years and up
SexFemale
SponsorAzienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Parma Academic / other
Locations5 sites (Parma, Italy and 4 other locations)
Trial IDNCT07313839 on ClinicalTrials.gov

What this trial studies

This is a multicenter, randomized controlled trial comparing double-layer self-locking (barbed) sutures to double-layer Polyglactin 910 sutures for laparoscopic or robot-assisted vaginal vault closure after hysterectomy for malignant gynecologic disease. Eligible patients are randomized 1:1 at participating Italian centers and undergo the assigned closure technique as part of their planned minimally invasive surgery. Outcomes including vaginal cuff dehiscence, infection, bleeding, and postoperative pain are recorded for up to three months after surgery. The trial is pragmatic in design and focuses on the effectiveness and safety of the two suture approaches specifically in the oncologic setting.

Who should consider this trial

Good fit: Adults aged 18 or older undergoing laparoscopic or robot-assisted hysterectomy for gynecologic malignancy who can provide written informed consent are the intended participants.

Not a fit: Patients undergoing open (laparotomic) or vaginal hysterectomy or those with contraindications to laparoscopic vaginal vault closure are unlikely to be eligible or to benefit from the comparison.

Why it matters

Potential benefit: If successful, this approach could reduce vaginal cuff complications, postoperative pain, and the need for additional procedures after minimally invasive hysterectomy.

How similar studies have performed: Previous small trials and observational studies, largely in benign hysterectomy, suggest barbed sutures can shorten suturing time with similar short-term complication rates, but robust randomized evidence for double-layer closure in cancer surgery is limited.

Eligibility criteria

Show full inclusion / exclusion criteria
Inclusion Criteria:

* Patients undergoing laparoscopic or robotically assisted hysterectomy for gynecologic malignant disease
* Age ≥ 18 years
* Ability to provide written informed consent

Exclusion Criteria:

* Laparotomic or vaginal hysterectomy
* Contraindication to laparoscopic vaginal vault closure

Where this trial is running

Parma, Italy and 4 other locations

Study contacts

How to participate

  1. Review the eligibility criteria above with your treating physician.
  2. Visit the official trial page on ClinicalTrials.gov for the most current contact information and recruitment status.
  3. Contact the listed study coordinator or principal investigator to request pre-screening. Pre-screening is free and never obligates you to enroll.
Conditions Gynecologic CancersVaginal Cuff DehiscencePostoperative ComplicationsLaparoscopic hysterectomyVaginal vault closureColporrhaphySelf-locking sutureBarbed suture
Last reviewed 2026-06-09 by the Find a Trial editorial team. Information on this page is for educational purposes and is not medical advice. Always consult qualified healthcare professionals about clinical trial participation.