Direct extubation versus extubation after a spontaneous breathing trial in low-risk patients
Official title: Direct Extubation Versus Extubation After a Spontaneous Breathing Trial in Patients at Low Risk of Extubation Failure
Run by Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de Paris · NCT07019636 · Data updated 2026-11-12
This trial tests whether skipping a spontaneous breathing trial and directly extubating is safe and helps more patients come off the ventilator within 24 hours in people who are ready to wean and at low risk of extubation failure.
Quick facts
| Study type | Interventional |
|---|---|
| Ages | 18 Years to 65 Years |
| Sex | All |
| Enrollment | 314 (estimated) |
| Sponsor | Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de Paris Academic / other |
| Locations | 1 site (Paris) |
| Status | Recruiting |
| Started | July 15, 2026 |
| Main results expected | September 18, 2028 |
| Study ends | October 15, 2028 |
| Registry record updated | July 17, 2026 |
| Trial ID | NCT07019636 on ClinicalTrials.gov |
Is this trial a fit for you?
✓Likely a good fit
Adults aged 18 to under 65 years who have been intubated for more than 24 hours and less than 4 days, and who meet predefined readiness-to-wean criteria with low risk of extubation failure.
✕Probably not a fit
Patients with higher risk factors for extubation failure or comorbidities not meeting readiness criteria may not benefit from direct extubation.
A plain-English reading of the study's rules. Only the study team can confirm whether you qualify.
What this trial studies
This randomized, open-label study compares two weaning strategies for adults on mechanical ventilation who meet readiness-to-wean criteria and are considered at low risk for extubation failure. One arm uses a direct extubation approach, while the other requires a successful spontaneous breathing trial before extubation. The primary endpoint is the proportion of patients extubated successfully within 24 hours after randomization. The study aims to determine if omitting the SBT can increase timely extubation without increasing failure. Safety considerations include avoiding unnecessary delays or extubation failure in this specific low-risk population.
Why it matters
Potential benefit: If successful, the direct extubation approach could shorten ventilation time and ICU stay for suitable patients.
How similar studies have gone: Previous approaches using readiness criteria and SBTs have shown variable results; this trial tests a novel direct-extubation strategy in a low-risk group.
Who can join: the full rules
Show full inclusion / exclusion criteria
Inclusion Criteria: * Age older than 18 years and \< 65 years old * Nasal or oral intubation longer than 24 hours and less than 4 days * Satisfaction to each following weaning readiness criteria: 1. Respiratory rate \< 35 cycles per minute 2. SpO2 \>90% with FiO2\<40% and PEEP\<8 cmH2O 3. RASS score between -2 and +2 with low level or no sedatives 4. No need or low doses of vasopressors 5. Adequate cough * Inform consent by patient or legal representative or the close relative or emergency inclusion procedure. Exclusion Criteria: * Risk factor for extubation failure as defined by any of the following criteria: * Chronic cardiac disease (left ejection fraction below 45%, documented history of cardiogenic pulmonary edema, permanent atrial fibrillation). * Chronic respiratory disease (severe COPD, documented restricted lung disease or obesity-hypoventilation syndrome) * Body mass index \> 30 kg/m2 * Airway patency problems, including high risk of developing laryngeal edema, inability to deal with respiratory secretions, brain injury, documented swallowing disorders * Tracheostomy * Underlying chronic neuromuscular disease * Do not resuscitate orders * Pregnant or lacting woman * Patient under guardianship * Patient without healthcare insurance * Refusal to participate and sign the written consent * Patients with traumatic brain injury * Post surgery patients * Patients included in another interventional trial that may have an impact on the evaluation criteria of the present study * Patient under AME
Where it's running
-
Hôpital Pitié Salpêtrière
Paris, France Recruiting
Study contacts
- Principal investigator: Martin DRES, Pr — Hôpital Pitié Salpêtrière - Assistance Publique Hôpitaux de Paris
- Study coordinator: Martin DRES, Pr
- Email: martin.dres@aphp.fr
- Phone: 01 42 16 77 97
Similar studies
Other studies for the same condition or treatment. Recruiting studies are listed first.
-
Characterization of weaning practices in ICUs in Global South countries
This observational study tests how adult ICU patients on mechanical ventilation who are starting to wean are extubated, observing them for 7 days after extubation and until hospital discharge or death.
-
Diffusion MRI to map nerve lesions in obstetric brachial plexus palsy
This study tests diffusion MRI and tractography to better understand nerve injuries in people with obstetric brachial plexus palsy.
-
Long-term心理 and cognitive check after stem cell transplant for immune deficiencies
This study tests the long-term neurocognitive and psychological functioning of 6–8 year-old children who had an allogeneic stem cell transplant for a primary immune deficiency, at least two years after the transplant.
-
Benchmarking AI language models against tumor boards for oncology treatment decisions
This project tests whether frontier AI language models can match the treatment recommendations of multidisciplinary tumor boards for common cancers using standardized synthetic cases.
-
Gut microbes and autoinflammatory diseases: how they may be linked
This study tests whether gut bacteria and their byproducts relate to digestive and inflammatory symptoms in people with autoinflammatory diseases.
-
How Eye Dominance Affects Fusion in Healthy Adults
This study tests whether fusional vergence measurements differ when tested on the dominant eye versus the non-dominant eye in healthy adults.
How to take part
- Review the eligibility criteria above with your treating physician.
- Check the official listing on ClinicalTrials.gov for the latest contact details and recruitment status.
- Contact the study coordinator or principal investigator to ask for pre-screening. Pre-screening is free and never obligates you to enroll.