Different ways to use non-invasive brain stimulation to help stroke recovery
Official title: Evaluating Different Protocols of Non-invasive Brain Stimulation (NIBS) in Stroke Rehabilitation
Run by National University Hospital, Singapore · NCT07786649 · Data updated 2026-11-12
This study tests if different non-invasive brain stimulation methods can improve motor and language recovery for stroke patients, depending on their goals and medical history.
Quick facts
| Study type | Interventional |
|---|---|
| Ages | 21 Years to 80 Years |
| Sex | All |
| Enrollment | 250 (estimated) |
| Sponsor | National University Hospital, Singapore Academic / other |
| Locations | 2 sites (Singapore and 1 other locations) |
| Status | Recruiting |
| Started | August 5, 2024 |
| Main results expected | November 30, 2028 |
| Study ends | November 30, 2028 |
| Registry record updated | August 26, 2026 |
| Trial ID | NCT07786649 on ClinicalTrials.gov |
Is this trial a fit for you?
✓Likely a good fit
Adults aged 21-80 with a history of stroke and at least one functional impairment (upper or lower limb motor deficit, aphasia, or neglect) who can follow instructions and consent.
✕Probably not a fit
Patients without measurable motor or language impairment or those with contraindications to brain stimulation may not benefit.
A plain-English reading of the study's rules. Only the study team can confirm whether you qualify.
What this trial studies
This non-randomized study aims to refine and confirm non-invasive brain stimulation protocols for motor and language deficits after stroke. About 250 participants from Alexandra Hospital and National University Hospital will undergo a baseline assessment, followed by a month of NIBS treatment using either tDCS or rTMS based on rehabilitation goals and individual assessments. The treatment plan assigns 20 sessions of tDCS or 12 sessions of rTMS tailored to goals such as improving limb movement or alleviating aphasia or neglect. Outcome measures are repeated after the final NIBS session to determine changes in function. The study seeks to clarify how patient stratification and protocol variation influence rehabilitation outcomes.
Why it matters
Potential benefit: If successful, the trial could help tailor brain stimulation therapies to individual stroke patients, potentially improving movement and language recovery.
How similar studies have gone: Previous work suggests non-invasive brain stimulation can aid recovery, but results vary; this study tests refined stratification and protocols.
Who can join: the full rules
Show full inclusion / exclusion criteria
Inclusion Criteria: 1. Age 21-80 years old; 2. Diagnosis of stroke, with good premorbid function. 3. Presenting with at least 1 of the following functional impairment: 3a. Upper limb motor impairment with the sum of Medical Research Council grades for shoulder abduction and finger Extension (SAFE) ≤ 8; 3b. Lower limb motor impairment with Functional Ambulation Classification (FAC) 0-3; 3c. Neglect as assessed by Behavioural Inattention Test with a cut-off of \<129 and Catherine Bergego Scale with a cut-off of \>5/30 3d. Expressive Aphasia as indicated by AusTOMS score of 1-4 (mild to severe) in the Language and Speech scales 4. Being able to follow instruction and give consent. Exclusion Criteria: 1. Pregnancy; 2. cardiac pacemakers; 3. Sensorimotor disturbance due to other causes other than stroke; 4. Uncontrolled medical conditions including hypertension, diabetes mellitus and unstable angina; 5. Major depression and a history of psychotic disorders; 6. Terminal diagnosis with life expectancy \<=1 year; 7. Claustrophobia for those undergoing fMRI scan. 8. Cognitive impairment and not being able to follow instruction.
Where it's running
-
National University Hospital
Singapore, Singapore Recruiting -
Alexandra Hospital
Singapore, Singapore Recruiting
Study contacts
- Principal investigator: Effie Chew — Nuh
- Study coordinator: Effie Chew, MBBS
- Email: effie_chew@nuhs.edu.sg
- Phone: 65-64722000
Similar studies
Other studies for the same condition or treatment. Recruiting studies are listed first.
-
Deep phenotyping to explore recovery in young adults after stroke
This project will test whether a detailed health and sample-collection approach (deep phenotyping) is practical and acceptable for people aged 18–55 who have had a stroke.
-
Stem cell therapy for chronic stroke recovery
This study is testing whether using a patient's own stem cells can help people with long-term stroke recovery feel better and improve their daily functioning.
-
AI-based tools to help diagnose, treat and predict stroke outcomes across multiple hospitals
This study tests AI-powered tools on real-world stroke patients to see if they can improve pre-hospital triage, diagnosis, and outcome prediction while data stay securely within each hospital.
-
Web-based therapy using action observation and mirror therapy for arm weakness after stroke
This trial tests whether a mobile telerehabilitation app delivering action observation therapy (AOT) alone or combined AOT with mirror therapy (AOT-MT) can improve upper limb function in people with subacute stroke.
-
Remote Ischaemic Conditioning for Fatigue After Stroke 2
Aat least 12 weeks after stroke, adults with post-stroke fatigue will try a simple hand-arm cuff treatment at home to see if it helps reduce fatigue.
-
Dual-task balance training plus computer-based cognitive training after stroke
In adults who recently had a stroke, the study tests whether adding computerized cognitive exercises to balance training improves balance and other recovery outcomes.
How to take part
- Review the eligibility criteria above with your treating physician.
- Check the official listing on ClinicalTrials.gov for the latest contact details and recruitment status.
- Contact the study coordinator or principal investigator to ask for pre-screening. Pre-screening is free and never obligates you to enroll.