Clinical trial Recruiting at 1 site Interventional Ages 18 and up

Different ways to record pain after surgery.

Official title: Comparison of Methods for Recording Post Operative Pain: A Prospective Randomized Trial

Run by University of California, San Francisco · NCT06206148 · Data updated 2026-11-12

This study tests three ways for adults after surgery to record their pain—a handwritten journal, a smartphone app, or a small electronic device—to see which method produces more frequent pain entries.

Quick facts

Study typeInterventional
Ages18 Years and up
SexAll
Enrollment147 (estimated)
SponsorUniversity of California, San Francisco
Academic / other
Locations1 site (San Francisco, California)
StatusRecruiting
StartedMarch 1, 2024
Main results expectedJune 2026
Study endsJune 2026
Registry record updatedJuly 14, 2025
Trial IDNCT06206148 on ClinicalTrials.gov

Is this trial a fit for you?

Likely a good fit

Adults (18+) recovering from surgery who can reliably use a smartphone, write by hand, or press a device button and who have intact pain sensation are ideal candidates.

Probably not a fit

Patients with altered mental status, neuropathy causing loss of pain sensation, a nerve catheter that eliminates pain, or an inability to use a smartphone or their hands are unlikely to be eligible or to benefit.

A plain-English reading of the study's rules. Only the study team can confirm whether you qualify.

What this trial studies

This randomized interventional study compares three methods of collecting postoperative pain intensity using a time- and date-stamped 0–10 visual analogue scale: a hand-written pain journal, a smartphone app, and a novel electronic pain recorder. Adult patients are randomly assigned to one of the three arms and instructed to record their pain as often as they like during the postoperative period. The primary outcome is the number of pain intensity recordings per day, compared across groups. The single-center trial is conducted at Zuckerberg San Francisco General Hospital and excludes patients who cannot use the assigned recording method or who lack pain sensation.

Why it matters

Potential benefit: If successful, this could identify a recording method that yields more complete and timely pain data to help tailor postoperative pain care.

How similar studies have gone: Prior research shows electronic diaries and smartphone apps often increase the frequency and timeliness of pain reporting compared with paper, but the specific novel electronic pain recorder in this trial has limited prior testing.

Who can join: the full rules

Show full inclusion / exclusion criteria
Inclusion Criteria:

* Patient over 18 years old

Exclusion Criteria:

* Patient cannot use a smartphone
* Patient cannot use his hands to write or press a button
* Patient has a nerve catheter (has no pain)
* Altered mental status
* Neuropathy causing loss of pain sensation

Where it's running

  • Zuckerberg San Francisco General Hospital
    San Francisco, California, United States
    Recruiting

Study contacts

  • Principal investigator: Meir T Marmor, MD — University of California, San Francisco
  • Study coordinator: Meir T Marmor, MD
  • Email: meir.marmor@ucsf.edu
  • Phone: 6504776238

Similar studies

Other studies for the same condition or treatment. Recruiting studies are listed first.

How to take part

  1. Review the eligibility criteria above with your treating physician.
  2. Check the official listing on ClinicalTrials.gov for the latest contact details and recruitment status.
  3. Contact the study coordinator or principal investigator to ask for pre-screening. Pre-screening is free and never obligates you to enroll.
Last reviewed 2026-11-14 by the Find a Trial editorial team. Information on this page is for educational purposes and is not medical advice. Always consult qualified healthcare professionals about clinical trial participation.