Database for Ultrasound-guided Peripheral Nerve Blocks
Official title: The Quality of Ultrasound-guided Peripheral Nerve Blocks, Nerve Injury, Bleeding Complications and Learning - a Prospective Observational Cohort Study
Run by Nordsjaellands Hospital · NCT06460792 · Data updated 2026-11-12
This study is creating a database to see how well ultrasound-guided nerve blocks work for anesthesia and to track any complications, helping doctors improve their skills and patient care.
Quick facts
| Study type | Observational |
|---|---|
| Ages | 2 Years and up |
| Sex | All |
| Enrollment | 5000 (estimated) |
| Sponsor | Nordsjaellands Hospital Academic / other |
| Locations | 1 site (Hillerød) |
| Status | Recruiting |
| Started | June 4, 2024 |
| Main results expected | June 4, 2029 |
| Study ends | June 4, 2029 |
| Registry record updated | June 14, 2024 |
| Trial ID | NCT06460792 on ClinicalTrials.gov |
Is this trial a fit for you?
✓Likely a good fit
Ideal candidates for this study are individuals over the age of 2 who require peripheral nerve blocks for anesthesia or pain management.
✕Probably not a fit
Patients with infections at the puncture site, allergies to local anesthetics, or those unable to understand oral instructions may not benefit from this study.
A plain-English reading of the study's rules. Only the study team can confirm whether you qualify.
What this trial studies
This study aims to establish a comprehensive database to analyze the effectiveness and complications of ultrasound-guided peripheral nerve blocks used in anesthesia. It will collect data on factors influencing block quality, such as success rates and duration, as well as the frequency and types of complications like nerve injuries and bleeding. The database will also allow anesthesiologists to track their performance over time and compare it with high-performing peers, ultimately enhancing the quality of care in regional anesthesia.
Why it matters
Potential benefit: If successful, this study could improve the safety and effectiveness of peripheral nerve blocks, leading to better pain management for patients.
How similar studies have gone: Other studies have shown success in using databases to track anesthesia outcomes, making this approach both relevant and potentially impactful.
Who can join: the full rules
Show full inclusion / exclusion criteria
Inclusion Criteria: \- age \> 2 years Exclusion Criteria * Infection at puncture site * Allergy to local anesthetics * Unable to understand given oral instruction
Where it's running
-
Dept of Anesthesiology, Nordsjællands Hospital
Hillerød, Denmark Recruiting
Study contacts
- Principal investigator: Christian Rothe, MD — Nordsjællands Hospital Hillerød
- Study coordinator: Kai Lange, MD
- Email: kai.henrik.wiborg.lange@regionh.dk
- Phone: +4548294252
Similar studies
Other studies for the same condition or treatment. Recruiting studies are listed first.
-
Lateral Quadratus Lumborum Block vs Intrathecal Morphine for Cesarean Section analgesia
This study tests whether a lateral quadratus lumborum block can provide pain relief after cesarean delivery as effectively as intrathecal morphine.
-
Impact of Communication Delays on Anesthesia Response in Medical Emergencies and Ultrasound-Guided Nerve Blocks
This study tests how an 80-second communication delay affects the speed and quality of regional anesthesia nerve blocks during emergencies in a spaceflight-like setting.
-
ESPB for persistent back pain in ankylosing spondylitis
This trial tests whether an erector spinae plane block can help reduce persistent back pain in adults with ankylosing spondylitis who still have pain despite controlled disease activity.
-
Comparison of meta-PENG vs suprainguinal fascia iliaca block for hip fracture pain
This study tests whether two ultrasound-guided nerve blocks help with pain control for adults having hip fracture surgery under spinal anesthesia.
-
Erector spinae plane block versus thoracoscopic intercostal nerve block for pain after VATS lung surgery
This compares two nerve-block techniques to see which gives better pain control after elective VATS lung surgery in adults.
-
DIPB vs SIFIB for pain control after total hip replacement
This will test whether the Deep Iliacus Plane Block (DIPB) or the Suprainguinal Fascia Iliaca Block (SIFIB) gives better pain relief and less leg weakness for adults having elective total hip replacement.
How to take part
- Review the eligibility criteria above with your treating physician.
- Check the official listing on ClinicalTrials.gov for the latest contact details and recruitment status.
- Contact the study coordinator or principal investigator to ask for pre-screening. Pre-screening is free and never obligates you to enroll.