CT-guided planning for PCI to see if it helps procedures
Official title: Coronary Computed Tomography Angiography (CCTA) for the Pre-procedural Planning of Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: A Randomized Trial of Routine PCI Versus CCTA-guided PCI
Run by Minneapolis Heart Institute Foundation · NCT07691502 · Data updated 2026-11-12
Doctors will test whether planning PCI with CT angiography helps the procedure go more smoothly for people with coronary artery disease.
Quick facts
| Study type | Interventional |
|---|---|
| Ages | 22 Years and up |
| Sex | All |
| Enrollment | 200 (estimated) |
| Sponsor | Minneapolis Heart Institute Foundation Academic / other |
| Drugs / interventions | radiation |
| Locations | 1 site (Minneapolis, Minnesota) |
| Status | Recruiting |
| Started | August 31, 2026 |
| Main results expected | July 15, 2028 |
| Study ends | December 1, 2028 |
| Registry record updated | August 27, 2026 |
| Trial ID | NCT07691502 on ClinicalTrials.gov |
Is this trial a fit for you?
✓Likely a good fit
Adults with at least one de novo moderate-to-severe native coronary stenosis who are referred for non-emergent PCI and have FFRCT-eligible lesions on CCTA.
✕Probably not a fit
Patients with multivessel disease beyond two target vessels, severe left main disease, prior CABG or PCI in the target vessel, or conditions that preclude FFRCT may not benefit.
A plain-English reading of the study's rules. Only the study team can confirm whether you qualify.
What this trial studies
This trial compares PCI planning using CT angiography guidance versus routine PCI planning without CCTA guidance. The main outcome is procedural time, with secondary measures including contrast volume, radiation exposure, fluoroscopy time, resource use, and peri-procedural biomarkers of injury. The study uses CCTA to characterize anatomy, assess plaque morphology, and estimate stent sizing, and may incorporate FFRCT-based assessments and co-registration to guide the procedure. Results will be interpreted in the context of prior research, including trials comparing CT-guided and IVUS-guided PCI, as evidence evolves for broader adoption.
Why it matters
Potential benefit: If successful, CT-guided PCI planning could reduce procedure time and exposure while improving planning accuracy.
How similar studies have gone: Prior randomized data (P4 trial) and emerging experiences suggest potential benefits of CT-guided approaches, but broader, definitive evidence is still being established.
Who can join: the full rules
Show full inclusion / exclusion criteria
Inclusion Criteria: * At least one moderate-severe coronary stenosis on CCTA with an FFRCT ≤0.80 involving no more than two vessels (i.e. target lesion(s) must be FFRCT eligible) * Referral for non-emergent PCI of at least one de novo stenosis in a native coronary artery with a reference diameter ≥2 mm on CCTA. Exclusion Criteria: * Multivessel CAD involving ≥3 vessels. * Severe left main disease \>50% * Prior CABG * Prior PCI in target vessel * Planned CABG * Chronic coronary total occlusion in the target vessel * ST-elevation myocardial infarction * Emergent PCI * Cardiac arrest * Cardiogenic shock * Scenarios where FFRCT is not possible: inadequate CCTA quality for FFRCT, small vessels \<2 mm, with stents at the target vessel. * Unstable high-risk NSTE-ACS (hemodynamic instability, refractory angina, unstable arrhythmias, persistent ischemia). * Patients who are pregnant or nursing or plan to be pregnant in the period up to 2 years following the index procedure will not be approached due to exposure to fluoroscopy.
Where it's running
-
Minneapolis Heart Institute Foundation
Minneapolis, Minnesota, United States Recruiting
Similar studies
Other studies for the same condition or treatment. Recruiting studies are listed first.
-
μFR-guided Drug-Coated Balloon Angioplasty vs Angiography-guided Angioplasty in Coronary Artery Disease
This trial tests whether using computational μFR guidance during drug-coated balloon angioplasty is better than standard angiography guidance for people with de novo coronary artery lesions.
-
Gastric Ultrasound Before CABG to See if Heart Function Changes Stomach Contents
This study checks whether people with weaker heart function before elective CABG have different stomach contents seen on ultrasound.
-
Can preoperative photon-counting CT help predict heart recovery after bypass surgery?
This observational study tests whether a preoperative photon-counting CT can help predict heart function 3 months after coronary bypass surgery in adults with coronary artery disease.
-
Real-World Drug-Coated Balloon Angioplasty in Coronary Artery Disease
This registry tests how drug-coated balloons perform in everyday clinical practice for adults with coronary artery disease undergoing PCI.
-
Predicting vasopressor needs after anesthesia in elective on-pump CABG using dynamic arterial elastance
This study tests whether EaDyn measured after induction can help predict which patients will need vasopressors during elective on-pump CABG.
-
Intraoperative Pulse Pressure Variation and Postoperative Lactate Clearance in CABG Patients
This study tests whether the amount a patient’s pulse pressure varies during surgery relates to how quickly lactate levels drop after CABG.
How to take part
- Review the eligibility criteria above with your treating physician.
- Check the official listing on ClinicalTrials.gov for the latest contact details and recruitment status.
- Contact the study coordinator or principal investigator to ask for pre-screening. Pre-screening is free and never obligates you to enroll.