Conduction system pacing vs. traditional pacing in adults with atrioventricular block
Official title: RandomIsed sTudy of Physiologic cArdiac stimuLation in patIents With Atrio-ventricular Conduction Disease: the ITALIA Study
Run by IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Bologna · NCT07279870 · Data updated 2026-11-12
This study tests whether stimulating the heart’s conduction system can reduce heart failure events for adults needing pacemakers due to AV block.
Quick facts
| Study type | Interventional |
|---|---|
| Ages | 18 Years and up |
| Sex | All |
| Enrollment | 1260 (estimated) |
| Sponsor | IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Bologna Academic / other |
| Locations | 14 sites (Bari and 13 other locations) |
| Status | Recruiting |
| Started | December 3, 2025 |
| Main results expected | December 31, 2030 |
| Study ends | June 30, 2031 |
| Registry record updated | May 27, 2026 |
| Trial ID | NCT07279870 on ClinicalTrials.gov |
Is this trial a fit for you?
✓Likely a good fit
Adults with AV block who are candidates for pacemaker implantation, including those with sinus rhythm or atrial tachyarrhythmias, and those undergoing AV node ablation with ventricular stimulation.
✕Probably not a fit
Patients with a very limited life expectancy, additional cardiac devices requiring other pacing strategies, or those meeting exclusion criteria may not benefit.
A plain-English reading of the study's rules. Only the study team can confirm whether you qualify.
What this trial studies
This randomized, interventional trial compares conduction system pacing with conventional right ventricular pacing in about 1,260 adults undergoing pacemaker implantation for AV conduction disease. It aims to see if the new pacing approach reduces cardiac decompensation, improves quality of life, and is cost-effective in clinical practice. The study will assess outcomes in patients with AV block in sinus rhythm or atrial tachyarrhythmias, including those undergoing AV node ablation with ventricular stimulation. Participants will be followed to evaluate feasibility, safety, and potential impact on health status and economic impact.
Why it matters
Potential benefit: If successful, patients may experience fewer heart failure events and an improved quality of life due to more physiologic pacing.
How similar studies have gone: Previous studies in physiologic pacing approaches have shown potential benefits, but broad, definitive evidence is still evolving and this trial aims to provide robust data.
Who can join: the full rules
Show full inclusion / exclusion criteria
Inclusion Criteria: * Adult patients with AV block in either sinus rhythm (SR) or permanent atrial tachycardia/atrial fibrillation (AT/AF), or with slow AV conduction during AT/AF, or undergoing AV node ablation + ventricular stimulation * male and female * acquired informed consent Exclusion Criteria: * Class I indication to Implantable Cardioverter Defibrillator (ICD) or to Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy (CRT) * Ejection Fraction \< 35% * Life expectancy \< 2 years * Participation in another clinical trial which might impact on the study outcome * Pregnancy, except as "In the event of an ongoing pregnancy, the doctor and patient will jointly assess, on a case-by-case basis and in the best interests of the patient, whether to propose participation in the study (random assignment to one of the two stimulation techniques) or to proceed as per clinical practice (assignment to one of the two stimulation techniques by the doctor). A screening log file of all eligible patients will be recorded, detailing the reason/s for non-randomization."
Where it's running
-
IRCCS AOUBO Policlinico di Sant'orsola
Bologna, Italy Recruiting -
Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Ferrara
Ferrara, Italy Recruiting -
Azienda Ospedal iera "Card. G. Panico"
Bari, Italy Not yet recruiting -
Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria Policlinico "G. Rodolico -San Marco"
Catania, Italy Not yet recruiting -
ASST Grande Ospedale Metropolitano Niguarda
Milan, Italy Not yet recruiting -
Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria Maggiore della Carità di Novara
Novara, Italy Not yet recruiting
Show 8 more locations
-
Azienda Sanitaria locali di Asti Ospedale Cardinal Massaia
Novara, Italy Not yet recruiting -
Azienda Ospedaliero-Univeritaria di Palermo - Policlinico Giaccone
Palermo, Italy Not yet recruiting -
Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Parma
Parma, Italy Not yet recruiting -
Azienda Ospedaliera Santa Maria della Misericordia
Perugia, Italy Not yet recruiting -
Policlinico Casilino
Roma, Italy Not yet recruiting -
Ospedale di Rovigo Aulss 5 Polesana
Rovigo, Italy Not yet recruiting -
Città delle Salute e della Scienza di Torino. Dipartimento Cardiovascolare e Toracico
Torino, Italy Not yet recruiting -
APSS Trento - Ospedale S. Maria del Carmine di Rovereto
Trento, Italy Not yet recruiting
Study contacts
- Principal investigator: Mauro Biffi, MD — IRCCS AOUBO Policlinico di Sant'Orsola
- Study coordinator: Mauro Biffi, MD
- Email: mauro.biffi@aosp.bo.it
- Phone: +390512149034
Similar studies
Other studies for the same condition or treatment. Recruiting studies are listed first.
-
Transjugular implantation of a leadless pacemaker (Aveir VR) for ventricular pacing
This study tests whether placing an Aveir VR leadless pacemaker through the neck vein can safely provide ventricular pacing in adults with bradycardia.
-
Focal Cryoablation vs. Radiofrequency Cardioneuroablation for Bradyarrhythmias
This study tests whether focal cryoablation can treat vagally driven slow heart rhythms as well as traditional radiofrequency ablation in adults with bradycardia or related syncope.
-
Left bundle area pacing with Closed Loop Stimulation in dual‑chamber pacemakers
This study tests whether a dual‑chamber pacemaker using left bundle area pacing and Closed Loop Stimulation can reduce device‑detected atrial fibrillation over 24 months in patients with sinus node disease and AV conduction issues.
-
Remote ECG monitoring after TAVI
This compares continuous 30-day remote ECG monitoring to standard short-term monitoring for adults after TAVI to see if it detects rhythm problems earlier.
-
Comparing two pacemaker pacing methods for AV block
This trial tests whether conduction system (left bundle branch area) pacing or standard right ventricular pacing works better for people with atrioventricular block who need a permanent pacemaker.
-
Left bundle branch pacing versus right ventricular pacing to reduce device‑detected fast atrial episodes in people with preserved ejection fraction
This trial will test whether left bundle branch pacing (LBBP) reduces the total time people with preserved ejection fraction spend in device‑detected fast atrial episodes compared with standard right ventricular pacing.
How to take part
- Review the eligibility criteria above with your treating physician.
- Check the official listing on ClinicalTrials.gov for the latest contact details and recruitment status.
- Contact the study coordinator or principal investigator to ask for pre-screening. Pre-screening is free and never obligates you to enroll.