Left bundle branch pacing versus right ventricular pacing to reduce device‑detected fast atrial episodes in people with preserved ejection fraction
Official title: Comparison of Left Bundle Branch Pacing Versus Conventional Right Ventricular Pacing on AHRE Burden in Patients With Preserved Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction and High Ventricular Pacing Dependency (LBBP-AHRE Trial): A Randomized Study
Run by University Hospital of Patras · NCT07250529 · Data updated 2026-11-12
This trial will test whether left bundle branch pacing (LBBP) reduces the total time people with preserved ejection fraction spend in device‑detected fast atrial episodes compared with standard right ventricular pacing.
Quick facts
| Study type | Interventional |
|---|---|
| Ages | 18 Years and up |
| Sex | All |
| Enrollment | 244 (estimated) |
| Sponsor | University Hospital of Patras Academic / other |
| Locations | 1 site (Pátrai) |
| Status | Recruiting |
| Started | February 5, 2026 |
| Main results expected | April 20, 2029 |
| Study ends | June 20, 2029 |
| Registry record updated | March 13, 2026 |
| Trial ID | NCT07250529 on ClinicalTrials.gov |
Is this trial a fit for you?
✓Likely a good fit
Adults (≥18 years) in sinus rhythm with preserved LVEF (≥50%) who are scheduled for a dual‑chamber pacemaker for permanent complete or high‑grade second‑degree AV block and are expected to require frequent ventricular pacing.
✕Probably not a fit
Patients with prior paroxysmal, persistent, or permanent atrial fibrillation, prior AF ablation, reduced LVEF (<50%), sinus‑node disease, significant structural/valvular heart disease, or those requiring device upgrades or antiarrhythmic therapy are excluded and unlikely to benefit from this protocol.
A plain-English reading of the study's rules. Only the study team can confirm whether you qualify.
What this trial studies
This is a prospective, randomized controlled trial comparing physiological left bundle branch pacing (LBBP) to conventional right ventricular (RV) pacing in patients expected to need frequent ventricular pacing and who have preserved left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF ≥50%). The primary outcome is cumulative duration of atrial high‑rate episodes (AHREs) recorded by implanted devices, with a predefined AHRE definition (atrial rate ≥170 bpm and duration ≥6 minutes) and validation of a random sample of stored atrial electrograms. Patients are randomized at pacemaker implantation to receive either LBBP or conventional RV lead placement and followed with device diagnostics and clinic visits to capture AHRE burden and related events. Key eligibility criteria include sinus rhythm at baseline, indication for dual‑chamber pacemaker for high‑grade AV block, and no prior history of atrial fibrillation or AF ablation.
Why it matters
Potential benefit: If successful, LBBP could reduce time spent in device‑detected atrial high‑rate episodes and potentially lower subsequent risk of clinical atrial fibrillation and thromboembolic events in paced patients with preserved LVEF.
How similar studies have gone: Observational and small comparative series of physiological pacing (His‑bundle or LBBP) have suggested less ventricular dyssynchrony and lower AF rates versus RV pacing, but randomized data specifically showing reduced AHRE burden are limited.
Who can join: the full rules
Show full inclusion / exclusion criteria
Inclusion Criteria: * Age ≥ 18 years * Scheduled implantation of a dual-chamber pacemaker for: Permanent complete heart block Permanent second-degree AV block (Mobitz II or Mobitz I) * Documented preserved LVEF (≥50%) * Sinus rhythm at baseline * Ability to provide written informed consent Exclusion Criteria: * History of paroxysmal, persistent, or permanent atrial fibrillation * Previous atrial fibrillation ablation (catheter-based or surgical) * LVEF \< 50% * Sinus node disease * Transient AV block requiring pacemaker implantation * Significant structural or valvular heart disease * Requirement for pacemaker system upgrade during the study period * Requirement for antiarrhythmic therapy for causes other than atrial fibrillation * Existing pacemaker or other cardiac device requiring modification for study participation * Enrollment in another clinical trial that could interfere with study endpoints or pacing parameters * Contraindication to LBBP or associated lead implantation procedure * Life expectancy \< 12 months * Any condition judged by the investigator to compromise participation or the integrity of study data
Where it's running
-
University General Hospital of Patras
Pátrai, Greece Recruiting
Study contacts
- Study coordinator: Georgios Leventopoulos
- Email: levent2669@gmail.com
- Phone: +306977786020
Similar studies
Other studies for the same condition or treatment. Recruiting studies are listed first.
-
Remote ECG monitoring after TAVI
This compares continuous 30-day remote ECG monitoring to standard short-term monitoring for adults after TAVI to see if it detects rhythm problems earlier.
-
Pulsed Field vs Cryoballoon for Pulmonary Vein Isolation in Atrial Fibrillation
This trial tests whether pulsed field ablation can shorten the procedure for first-time PVI in AF patients compared with cryoballoon ablation, while keeping safety and effectiveness similar.
-
Pulsed Field Ablation vs Cryoablation for Atrial Fibrillation Under Deep Sedation
This trial tests whether pulsed field ablation (PFA) done under deep sedation works as well as cryoballoon ablation for treating atrial fibrillation, aiming to avoid general anesthesia.
-
Bachmann’s Bundle Pacing vs Right Atrial Appendage Pacing for AF
This study tests two common atrial pacing methods to see which one is safer over 12 months for people getting a new pacemaker, ICD, or CRT device.
-
AI-powered ECG to help diagnose and predict outcomes in heart disease
Researchers test an AI-enhanced ECG to help diagnose and predict outcomes for people with cardiovascular diseases.
-
Pace-and-ablate strategy in atrial fibrillation: who benefits and long-term outcomes
This study looks at adults with atrial fibrillation who underwent AV node ablation with permanent pacing to see who develops pacing-induced problems and how they do long-term.
How to take part
- Review the eligibility criteria above with your treating physician.
- Check the official listing on ClinicalTrials.gov for the latest contact details and recruitment status.
- Contact the study coordinator or principal investigator to ask for pre-screening. Pre-screening is free and never obligates you to enroll.