Focal Cryoablation vs. Radiofrequency Cardioneuroablation for Bradyarrhythmias
Official title: Prospective Non-Randomized Comparison of Point-by-Point Cryoablation Using Freezor™ Xtra Versus Radiofrequency Ablation Using TactiFlex™ SE of Parasympathetic Ganglia (Cardioneuroablation) in Patients With Vagally-Mediated Bradyarrhythmias
Run by Tomsk National Research Medical Center of the Russian Academy of Sciences · NCT07671898 · Data updated 2026-11-12
This study tests whether focal cryoablation can treat vagally driven slow heart rhythms as well as traditional radiofrequency ablation in adults with bradycardia or related syncope.
Quick facts
| Study type | Interventional |
|---|---|
| Ages | 18 Years to 60 Years |
| Sex | All |
| Enrollment | 60 (estimated) |
| Sponsor | Tomsk National Research Medical Center of the Russian Academy of Sciences Academic / other |
| Locations | 1 site (Tomsk, Tomsk Oblast) |
| Status | Recruiting |
| Started | September 1, 2024 |
| Main results expected | December 25, 2027 |
| Study ends | December 25, 2028 |
| Registry record updated | June 26, 2026 |
| Trial ID | NCT07671898 on ClinicalTrials.gov |
Is this trial a fit for you?
✓Likely a good fit
Adults aged 18-60 with symptomatic vagally mediated bradyarrhythmias and a positive atropine or exercise test, eligible for cardioneuroablation.
✕Probably not a fit
Patients lacking vagal contribution to bradyarrhythmia or with contraindications to catheter ablation may not benefit.
A plain-English reading of the study's rules. Only the study team can confirm whether you qualify.
What this trial studies
This is a prospective, non-randomized, single-center comparison of two CNA techniques in adults with symptomatic vagally mediated bradyarrhythmias. Participants are assigned to either focal cryoablation or RF ablation and followed for recurrence of bradyarrhythmia and syncope, as well as safety outcomes. The procedure targets parasympathetic ganglionated plexi to reduce vagal influence on the heart. Cryoablation may offer more consistent lesion formation in fatty epicardial tissue compared with RF energy. The study aims to determine if cryoablation is as effective and safe as RF ablation for cardioneuroablation.
Why it matters
Potential benefit: If successful, this approach could offer an alternative to pacemaker implantation for younger patients with vagally mediated bradyarrhythmias.
How similar studies have gone: This direct comparison between focal cryoablation and RF ablation for cardioneuroablation is novel; prior work supports CNA as a potential pacemaker alternative in selected patients.
Who can join: the full rules
Show full inclusion / exclusion criteria
Inclusion Criteria: * Age 18 to 60 years; * Symptomatic bradycardia (sinus bradycardia or bradycardia due to atrioventricular block, including transient); * Severe asymptomatic sinus bradycardia (heart rate less than 30 beats per minute); * Transient second- or third-degree atrioventricular block; * Persistent second-degree atrioventricular block; * Rhythm pauses greater than 6 seconds; * Recurrent syncope or presyncope with documented association with bradycardia (without trauma); * Positive response to atropine (heart rate increase ≥25% from baseline or \>90 beats per minute) OR positive response to exercise (heart rate increase ≥25% from baseline or \>90 beats per minute, OR conversion of second- or third-degree atrioventricular block to first-degree block or complete normalization of atrioventricular conduction during sinus rhythm); Exclusion Criteria: * Chronic antiarrhythmic drug therapy (ongoing); * Presence of implanted pacemaker, cardiac resynchronization therapy device, or implantable cardioverter-defibrillator; * Bradyarrhythmia secondary to medications; * Bradyarrhythmia secondary to electrolyte imbalance (hyperkalemia); * Bradyarrhythmia secondary to hypothyroidism; * Bradyarrhythmia secondary to obstructive sleep apnea syndrome; * Absence of response to pharmacological denervation (no heart rate increase after atropine administration up to maximum dose of 0.2 mg/kg); * Clinically significant coronary artery disease; * Post-myocardial infarction cardiosclerosis; * Hemodynamically significant congenital heart disease (including surgically corrected); * Stable ventricular tachycardia in the setting of bradycardia; * History of stroke or transient ischemic attack; * Prior open-heart surgery; * Prior catheter-based coronary artery intervention or percutaneous coronary intervention; * Pregnancy or breastfeeding; Age less than 18 years Age greater than 60 years
Where it's running
-
Cardiology Research Institute, Tomsk National Research Medical Center of the Russian Academy of Sciences
Tomsk, Tomsk Oblast, Russia Recruiting
Study contacts
- Study coordinator: Roman E Batalov, MD, PhD
- Email: romancer@rambler.ru
- Phone: +73822558401
Similar studies
Other studies for the same condition or treatment. Recruiting studies are listed first.
-
Transjugular implantation of a leadless pacemaker (Aveir VR) for ventricular pacing
This study tests whether placing an Aveir VR leadless pacemaker through the neck vein can safely provide ventricular pacing in adults with bradycardia.
-
Cardioneuroablation for treating bradycardia
This study is testing a new procedure called cardioneuroablation to see if it can help people with slow heart rates feel better without needing a permanent pacemaker.
-
Registry for cardioneuroablation in patients with recurrent vasovagal syncope
This study is collecting information to see how well a new treatment called cardioneuroablation works for people with frequent fainting spells caused by vasovagal syncope.
-
SPIKE FLOW endocardial pacing lead safety and performance study
This study tests whether the SPIKE FLOW temporary endocardial pacing lead is safe and effective in adults needing temporary pacing during heart-related conditions.
-
Factors Linked to Slow Heart Rate After Pulsed Field Ablation for Atrial Fibrillation
This study looks for factors that might cause bradycardia during the hospital stay after AF ablation using pulsed field technology.
-
Conduction System Pacing Display Research During LBBAP Implant
Researchers are testing a CSP Display System during left bundle branch area pacing pacemaker implant to see if it accurately shows heart signals compared with a standard ECG.
How to take part
- Review the eligibility criteria above with your treating physician.
- Check the official listing on ClinicalTrials.gov for the latest contact details and recruitment status.
- Contact the study coordinator or principal investigator to ask for pre-screening. Pre-screening is free and never obligates you to enroll.