Clinical trial Recruiting at 1 site Interventional Ages 18 to 60

Focal Cryoablation vs. Radiofrequency Cardioneuroablation for Bradyarrhythmias

Official title: Prospective Non-Randomized Comparison of Point-by-Point Cryoablation Using Freezor™ Xtra Versus Radiofrequency Ablation Using TactiFlex™ SE of Parasympathetic Ganglia (Cardioneuroablation) in Patients With Vagally-Mediated Bradyarrhythmias

Run by Tomsk National Research Medical Center of the Russian Academy of Sciences · NCT07671898 · Data updated 2026-11-12

This study tests whether focal cryoablation can treat vagally driven slow heart rhythms as well as traditional radiofrequency ablation in adults with bradycardia or related syncope.

More Bradycardia trials

Quick facts

Study typeInterventional
Ages18 Years to 60 Years
SexAll
Enrollment60 (estimated)
SponsorTomsk National Research Medical Center of the Russian Academy of Sciences
Academic / other
Locations1 site (Tomsk, Tomsk Oblast)
StatusRecruiting
StartedSeptember 1, 2024
Main results expectedDecember 25, 2027
Study endsDecember 25, 2028
Registry record updatedJune 26, 2026
Trial IDNCT07671898 on ClinicalTrials.gov

Is this trial a fit for you?

Likely a good fit

Adults aged 18-60 with symptomatic vagally mediated bradyarrhythmias and a positive atropine or exercise test, eligible for cardioneuroablation.

Probably not a fit

Patients lacking vagal contribution to bradyarrhythmia or with contraindications to catheter ablation may not benefit.

A plain-English reading of the study's rules. Only the study team can confirm whether you qualify.

What this trial studies

This is a prospective, non-randomized, single-center comparison of two CNA techniques in adults with symptomatic vagally mediated bradyarrhythmias. Participants are assigned to either focal cryoablation or RF ablation and followed for recurrence of bradyarrhythmia and syncope, as well as safety outcomes. The procedure targets parasympathetic ganglionated plexi to reduce vagal influence on the heart. Cryoablation may offer more consistent lesion formation in fatty epicardial tissue compared with RF energy. The study aims to determine if cryoablation is as effective and safe as RF ablation for cardioneuroablation.

Why it matters

Potential benefit: If successful, this approach could offer an alternative to pacemaker implantation for younger patients with vagally mediated bradyarrhythmias.

How similar studies have gone: This direct comparison between focal cryoablation and RF ablation for cardioneuroablation is novel; prior work supports CNA as a potential pacemaker alternative in selected patients.

Who can join: the full rules

Show full inclusion / exclusion criteria
Inclusion Criteria:

* Age 18 to 60 years;
* Symptomatic bradycardia (sinus bradycardia or bradycardia due to atrioventricular block, including transient);
* Severe asymptomatic sinus bradycardia (heart rate less than 30 beats per minute);
* Transient second- or third-degree atrioventricular block;
* Persistent second-degree atrioventricular block;
* Rhythm pauses greater than 6 seconds;
* Recurrent syncope or presyncope with documented association with bradycardia (without trauma);
* Positive response to atropine (heart rate increase ≥25% from baseline or \>90 beats per minute) OR positive response to exercise (heart rate increase ≥25% from baseline or \>90 beats per minute, OR conversion of second- or third-degree atrioventricular block to first-degree block or complete normalization of atrioventricular conduction during sinus rhythm);

Exclusion Criteria:

* Chronic antiarrhythmic drug therapy (ongoing);
* Presence of implanted pacemaker, cardiac resynchronization therapy device, or implantable cardioverter-defibrillator;
* Bradyarrhythmia secondary to medications;
* Bradyarrhythmia secondary to electrolyte imbalance (hyperkalemia);
* Bradyarrhythmia secondary to hypothyroidism;
* Bradyarrhythmia secondary to obstructive sleep apnea syndrome;
* Absence of response to pharmacological denervation (no heart rate increase after atropine administration up to maximum dose of 0.2 mg/kg);
* Clinically significant coronary artery disease;
* Post-myocardial infarction cardiosclerosis;
* Hemodynamically significant congenital heart disease (including surgically corrected);
* Stable ventricular tachycardia in the setting of bradycardia;
* History of stroke or transient ischemic attack;
* Prior open-heart surgery;
* Prior catheter-based coronary artery intervention or percutaneous coronary intervention;
* Pregnancy or breastfeeding; Age less than 18 years Age greater than 60 years

Where it's running

  • Cardiology Research Institute, Tomsk National Research Medical Center of the Russian Academy of Sciences
    Tomsk, Tomsk Oblast, Russia
    Recruiting

Study contacts

Similar studies

Other studies for the same condition or treatment. Recruiting studies are listed first.

How to take part

  1. Review the eligibility criteria above with your treating physician.
  2. Check the official listing on ClinicalTrials.gov for the latest contact details and recruitment status.
  3. Contact the study coordinator or principal investigator to ask for pre-screening. Pre-screening is free and never obligates you to enroll.
Last reviewed 2026-11-14 by the Find a Trial editorial team. Information on this page is for educational purposes and is not medical advice. Always consult qualified healthcare professionals about clinical trial participation.