Comparing two ventilation modes for ICU patients
Official title: Comparative Analysis of Ventilation Distribution in Intensive Care: Mandatory Minute Ventilation Versus Synchronized Intermittent Mandatory Ventilation Using Electrical Impedance Tomography"
Run by Harran University · NCT06961227 · Data updated 2026-11-12
This study is trying to see which breathing support method, SIMV or MMV, works better for stable adult ICU patients by switching them between the two and monitoring their lung function.
Quick facts
| Study type | Observational |
|---|---|
| Ages | 18 Years and up |
| Sex | All |
| Enrollment | 25 (estimated) |
| Sponsor | Harran University Academic / other |
| Drugs / interventions | radiation |
| Locations | 1 site (Sanliurfa) |
| Status | Recruiting |
| Started | March 10, 2025 |
| Main results expected | September 30, 2025 |
| Study ends | October 31, 2025 |
| Registry record updated | May 7, 2025 |
| Trial ID | NCT06961227 on ClinicalTrials.gov |
Is this trial a fit for you?
✓Likely a good fit
Ideal candidates are adults over 18 years old who are intubated, hemodynamically stable, and require mechanical ventilation without neuromuscular blockade.
✕Probably not a fit
Patients who are pregnant, have neuromuscular diseases, unstable hemodynamics, or require high PEEP may not benefit from this study.
A plain-English reading of the study's rules. Only the study team can confirm whether you qualify.
What this trial studies
This observational study evaluates the effectiveness of two mechanical ventilation modes, Synchronized Intermittent Mandatory Ventilation (SIMV) and Mandatory Minute Ventilation (MMV), in adult ICU patients who are hemodynamically stable. The study utilizes Electrical Impedance Tomography (EIT) to monitor lung ventilation and perfusion in real-time, allowing for a detailed comparison of the physiological impacts of each ventilation mode. Patients will switch between SIMV and MMV to assess which mode provides better respiratory support without the need for investigational interventions.
Why it matters
Potential benefit: If successful, this study could improve mechanical ventilation strategies, leading to better respiratory outcomes for critically ill patients.
How similar studies have gone: Previous studies have shown the effectiveness of similar ventilation approaches, but this specific comparison using EIT is novel.
Who can join: the full rules
Show full inclusion / exclusion criteria
Inclusion Criteria: * Age ≥ 18 years Intubated and receiving invasive mechanical ventilation Hemodynamically stable (no vasopressor support) FiO₂ ≤ 60% PEEP ≤ 8 cmH₂O Not receiving neuromuscular blocking agents Able to tolerate switching between SIMV and MMV modes Exclusion Criteria: Pregnant or breastfeeding patients Patients with neuromuscular diseases affecting respiratory drive Unstable hemodynamics or ongoing need for vasopressors Patients requiring high PEEP (\>8 cmH₂O) Patients with DNR (do not resuscitate) status Participation in another interventional study \-
Where it's running
-
Harran University Faculty of Medicine, Department of Anesthesiology and Reanimation
Sanliurfa, Turkey (Türkiye) Recruiting
Study contacts
- Study coordinator: MELAHAT YALÇIN SOLAK, Medical Doctor
- Email: melosyalcin@gmail.com
- Phone: +905326479195
Similar studies
Other studies for the same condition or treatment. Recruiting studies are listed first.
-
Permissive lung-protective ventilation in invasively ventilated adults
This study tests whether lowering the breathing rate during mechanical ventilation is better than standard lung-protective ventilation for adults in the ICU who need invasive ventilation.
-
Compare two ventilator modes in adults with cardiac ICU needs and invasive ventilation
This pilot tests whether volume-controlled versus pressure-controlled ventilation can be safely used in adults with heart disease and respiratory failure who need invasive ventilation.
-
How short high-oxygen exposures affect brain blood flow during mechanical ventilation
We will test whether brief, controlled increases in ventilator oxygen change brain blood flow in adults who are intubated and on mechanical ventilation in the ICU.
-
Neuromuscular electrical stimulation for patients on invasive mechanical ventilation (MOVCARE)
We will test whether adding neuromuscular electrical stimulation to usual physical therapy helps adults on invasive mechanical ventilation regain leg muscle strength faster.
-
Monitoring diaphragm electrical activity and breathing effort during ventilator weaning
We will see if surface diaphragm EMG, esophageal pressure, and oxygen use measured during a spontaneous breathing trial can predict who will fail to wean from the ventilator in the ICU.
-
Combining chest X-rays and arterial blood gas results to predict ventilator need in critically ill adults
This project will test whether a computer model that uses chest X-rays and arterial blood gas results can predict which critically ill adults will need mechanical ventilation.
How to take part
- Review the eligibility criteria above with your treating physician.
- Check the official listing on ClinicalTrials.gov for the latest contact details and recruitment status.
- Contact the study coordinator or principal investigator to ask for pre-screening. Pre-screening is free and never obligates you to enroll.