Clinical trial Recruiting at 1 site Observational Ages 18 and up

Comparing two ventilation modes for ICU patients

Official title: Comparative Analysis of Ventilation Distribution in Intensive Care: Mandatory Minute Ventilation Versus Synchronized Intermittent Mandatory Ventilation Using Electrical Impedance Tomography"

Run by Harran University · NCT06961227 · Data updated 2026-11-12

This study is trying to see which breathing support method, SIMV or MMV, works better for stable adult ICU patients by switching them between the two and monitoring their lung function.

Quick facts

Study typeObservational
Ages18 Years and up
SexAll
Enrollment25 (estimated)
SponsorHarran University
Academic / other
Drugs / interventionsradiation
Locations1 site (Sanliurfa)
StatusRecruiting
StartedMarch 10, 2025
Main results expectedSeptember 30, 2025
Study endsOctober 31, 2025
Registry record updatedMay 7, 2025
Trial IDNCT06961227 on ClinicalTrials.gov

Is this trial a fit for you?

Likely a good fit

Ideal candidates are adults over 18 years old who are intubated, hemodynamically stable, and require mechanical ventilation without neuromuscular blockade.

Probably not a fit

Patients who are pregnant, have neuromuscular diseases, unstable hemodynamics, or require high PEEP may not benefit from this study.

A plain-English reading of the study's rules. Only the study team can confirm whether you qualify.

What this trial studies

This observational study evaluates the effectiveness of two mechanical ventilation modes, Synchronized Intermittent Mandatory Ventilation (SIMV) and Mandatory Minute Ventilation (MMV), in adult ICU patients who are hemodynamically stable. The study utilizes Electrical Impedance Tomography (EIT) to monitor lung ventilation and perfusion in real-time, allowing for a detailed comparison of the physiological impacts of each ventilation mode. Patients will switch between SIMV and MMV to assess which mode provides better respiratory support without the need for investigational interventions.

Why it matters

Potential benefit: If successful, this study could improve mechanical ventilation strategies, leading to better respiratory outcomes for critically ill patients.

How similar studies have gone: Previous studies have shown the effectiveness of similar ventilation approaches, but this specific comparison using EIT is novel.

Who can join: the full rules

Show full inclusion / exclusion criteria
Inclusion Criteria:

* Age ≥ 18 years

Intubated and receiving invasive mechanical ventilation

Hemodynamically stable (no vasopressor support)

FiO₂ ≤ 60%

PEEP ≤ 8 cmH₂O

Not receiving neuromuscular blocking agents

Able to tolerate switching between SIMV and MMV modes

Exclusion Criteria:

Pregnant or breastfeeding patients

Patients with neuromuscular diseases affecting respiratory drive

Unstable hemodynamics or ongoing need for vasopressors

Patients requiring high PEEP (\>8 cmH₂O)

Patients with DNR (do not resuscitate) status

Participation in another interventional study

\-

Where it's running

  • Harran University Faculty of Medicine, Department of Anesthesiology and Reanimation
    Sanliurfa, Turkey (Türkiye)
    Recruiting

Study contacts

Similar studies

Other studies for the same condition or treatment. Recruiting studies are listed first.

How to take part

  1. Review the eligibility criteria above with your treating physician.
  2. Check the official listing on ClinicalTrials.gov for the latest contact details and recruitment status.
  3. Contact the study coordinator or principal investigator to ask for pre-screening. Pre-screening is free and never obligates you to enroll.
Last reviewed 2026-11-14 by the Find a Trial editorial team. Information on this page is for educational purposes and is not medical advice. Always consult qualified healthcare professionals about clinical trial participation.