Comparing two surgical techniques for coronary artery bypass grafting
Official title: Comparison of RIMA-SVG and Ao-SVG Techniques in Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting : A Prospective Randomized Double-Blind Study on Graft Patency and Clinical Outcomes
Run by Second Hospital of Jilin University · NCT06787651 · Data updated 2026-05-14
This study is no longer in our active list. It may have stopped recruiting or finished. The details below are as of 2026-05-14 and are kept for reference. Check ClinicalTrials.gov for its current status, or see similar studies below.
This study is testing which of two surgical methods for heart bypass surgery works better in keeping the grafts open and reducing complications for patients.
Quick facts
| Study type | Interventional |
|---|---|
| Ages | 18 Years to 80 Years |
| Sex | All |
| Enrollment | 300 (estimated) |
| Sponsor | Second Hospital of Jilin University Academic / other |
| Locations | 2 sites (Changchun, Jilin and 1 other locations) |
| Trial ID | NCT06787651 on ClinicalTrials.gov |
Is this trial a fit for you?
✓Likely a good fit
Ideal candidates are patients aged 18 to 80 years scheduled for their first planned CABG with at least two sequential saphenous vein grafts.
✕Probably not a fit
Patients requiring additional cardiac surgeries or those with severe vascular or systemic conditions may not benefit from this study.
A plain-English reading of the study's rules. Only the study team can confirm whether you qualify.
What this trial studies
This clinical trial evaluates the effectiveness of two surgical methods, RIMA-SVG and Ao-SVG, in patients undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG). A total of 300 patients will be randomly assigned to either the RIMA-SVG group, where saphenous vein grafts are connected to the right internal mammary artery, or the Ao-SVG group, where grafts are connected to the ascending aorta. The primary outcome is the patency of the grafts after one year, while secondary outcomes include complications such as mortality and major adverse cardiovascular events. Patients will be monitored for 12 months post-surgery to assess their clinical outcomes and graft health.
Why it matters
Potential benefit: If successful, this study could lead to improved graft patency and reduced complications for patients undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting.
How similar studies have gone: Other studies have explored similar surgical techniques, but the specific comparison of RIMA-SVG and Ao-SVG in this context is relatively novel.
Who can join: the full rules
Show full inclusion / exclusion criteria
Inclusion Criteria: 1. Patients aged 18 to 80 years. 2. Scheduled for their first planned coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) with at least two sequential saphenous vein grafts (SVGs). 3. Able and willing to provide written informed consent. Exclusion Criteria: 1. Patients unable to provide written informed consent. 2. Patients requiring other cardiac surgeries (e.g. valve replacement, congenital heart defect surgery, or aortic dissection repair). 3. Patients with severe stenosis of the left or right subclavian artery. 4. Patients for whom aortic clamping is infeasible due to calcification of the ascending aorta. 5. Patients with bilateral SVG varicosities unsuitable for grafting. 6. Patients with active malignancy. 7. Patients with active bleeding or a history of bleeding tendency. 8. Patients with previous intracranial hemorrhage, ischemic stroke within 14 days preoperatively, or severe carotid artery stenosis. 9. Patients with severe hepatic dysfunction. 10. Patients requiring emergency surgery.
Where it's running
-
the Second Hospital of Jilin University
Changchun, Jilin, China Recruiting -
the Second Hospital of Jilin University
Changchun, Jilin, China Recruiting
Study contacts
- Study coordinator: kexiang liu, Ph.D.
- Email: kxliu64@hotmail.com
- Phone: 17390920328
Similar studies
Other studies for the same condition or treatment. Recruiting studies are listed first.
-
CCTA-Guided CABG vs CAG-Guided CABG
This study tests whether planning CABG with a non-invasive CCTA scan works as well as planning with the standard invasive CAG approach for people with blocked heart arteries.
-
Comparing single and multiple arterial grafts in women with heart disease
This study is testing whether using one or more artery grafts during heart surgery can lead to better health outcomes and quality of life for women with heart disease.
-
μFR-guided Drug-Coated Balloon Angioplasty vs Angiography-guided Angioplasty in Coronary Artery Disease
This trial tests whether using computational μFR guidance during drug-coated balloon angioplasty is better than standard angiography guidance for people with de novo coronary artery lesions.
-
Gastric Ultrasound Before CABG to See if Heart Function Changes Stomach Contents
This study checks whether people with weaker heart function before elective CABG have different stomach contents seen on ultrasound.
-
Can preoperative photon-counting CT help predict heart recovery after bypass surgery?
This observational study tests whether a preoperative photon-counting CT can help predict heart function 3 months after coronary bypass surgery in adults with coronary artery disease.
-
Real-World Drug-Coated Balloon Angioplasty in Coronary Artery Disease
This registry tests how drug-coated balloons perform in everyday clinical practice for adults with coronary artery disease undergoing PCI.
How to take part
- Review the eligibility criteria above with your treating physician.
- Check the official listing on ClinicalTrials.gov for the latest contact details and recruitment status.
- Contact the study coordinator or principal investigator to ask for pre-screening. Pre-screening is free and never obligates you to enroll.