Comparing two pain relief methods for open colon surgery
Official title: Intrathecal Morphine Versus Thoracic Epidural Analgesia for Open Colorectal Cancer Surgery: a Randomized Controlled Trial
Run by University Hospital of Split · NCT06935708 · Data updated 2026-11-12
This study is testing whether a single dose of spinal morphine or continuous epidural pain relief works better for managing pain after open colon surgery for cancer patients.
Quick facts
| Phase | Phase 4 |
|---|---|
| Study type | Interventional |
| Ages | 18 Years to 80 Years |
| Sex | All |
| Enrollment | 98 (estimated) |
| Sponsor | University Hospital of Split Academic / other |
| Locations | 1 site (Split) |
| Status | Recruiting |
| Started | April 8, 2025 |
| Main results expected | October 2026 |
| Study ends | November 2026 |
| Registry record updated | April 20, 2025 |
| Trial ID | NCT06935708 on ClinicalTrials.gov |
Is this trial a fit for you?
✓Likely a good fit
Ideal candidates are adults aged 18-80 with colorectal carcinoma undergoing laparoscopic abdominal surgery.
✕Probably not a fit
Patients with abnormal coagulation function, pre-existing neurologic deficits, or a history of opioid abuse may not benefit from this study.
A plain-English reading of the study's rules. Only the study team can confirm whether you qualify.
What this trial studies
This study evaluates the effectiveness of intrathecal morphine versus continuous epidural analgesia for pain management in patients undergoing open colorectal cancer surgery. Participants will be randomly assigned to either the epidural group, receiving continuous epidural analgesia, or the spinal group, receiving a single dose of intrathecal morphine. The primary outcome is pain intensity at rest measured 24 hours post-surgery, while secondary outcomes include analgesic consumption, patient satisfaction, and length of hospital stay. The study aims to determine which method provides better pain relief and fewer side effects during recovery.
Why it matters
Potential benefit: If successful, this study could lead to improved pain management strategies for patients undergoing open colorectal surgery.
How similar studies have gone: Previous studies have shown varying success with similar analgesia methods, but this specific comparison is novel.
Who can join: the full rules
Show full inclusion / exclusion criteria
Inclusion Criteria: * Male or female patients with colorectal carcinoma undergoing laparoscopic abdominal surgery aged 18-80 years, ASA classification I-III, Body Mass Index (BMI) 15-35 kg/m2. Exclusion Criteria: * abnormal coagulation function, defined as prothrombin time or activated partial prothrombin time above standard laboratory values or an international normalised ratio (INR) ≥1.4; or receiving ongoing therapeutic anticoagulation, * thrombocytopenia, defined as a platelet count \<80×10 9 L-1, * pre-existing skin infection at the neuraxial anesthesia puncture site, * pre-existing neurologic deficit, including peripheral neuropathy, * patients with dementia or other medical condition that includes communication difficulties, * patients with bradycardia (pulse \<50/min) or with conduction block (2nd or 3rd degree) * history of opioid abuse, * allergies to any of the drugs used in the study. Additionally, patients converted from laparoscopy to laparotomy due to technical surgical issues, patients with postoperative surgical complications (need for revision) or if epidural catheter placement/spinal anesthesia is unsuccessful even after an attempt by a senior anesthesiologist will also be excluded.
Where it's running
-
University hospital of Split
Split, Croatia Recruiting
Study contacts
- Study coordinator: Svjetlana Došenović, MD, PhD
- Email: sdosenovic@yahoo.com
- Phone: +38521556180
Similar studies
Other studies for the same condition or treatment. Recruiting studies are listed first.
-
Exercise after pelvic radiation to see if it lowers colorectal cancer risk
This study tests whether regular walking therapy after pelvic radiation for prostate cancer can influence markers of colorectal cancer in colon tissue and blood.
-
Irreversible Electroporation for Recurrent Pelvic Tumors
This study tests whether using irreversible electroporation (IRE) is safe and helps control recurrent pelvic tumors in adults who can’t have other local treatments.
-
Smart Symptom Tracking with ALEX for GI Health in Young Adults
This trial tests whether the Smart Symptom Tracking ALEX app can better track GI symptoms in young adults (18–44) compared with standard paper logs.
-
Dexa vs Dexmedetomidine with Bupivacaine in TAP Block for Laparotomy Analgesia
This study tests whether adding dexamethasone or dexmedetomidine to bupivacaine in a TAP block improves postoperative pain control after laparotomy.
-
Culturally adapted online genetic counseling and testing education for African American cancer survivors
We will test a culturally adapted online genetic counseling program to see if it increases genetic counseling and genetic testing among African American breast, prostate, and colorectal cancer survivors.
-
Zanidatamab given before surgery for HER2-positive colon or rectal cancer
This tests whether giving zanidatamab before surgery helps adults with HER2-positive, RAS‑wildtype colon or rectal cancer who are planned for curative treatment.
How to take part
- Review the eligibility criteria above with your treating physician.
- Check the official listing on ClinicalTrials.gov for the latest contact details and recruitment status.
- Contact the study coordinator or principal investigator to ask for pre-screening. Pre-screening is free and never obligates you to enroll.