Comparing two methods for sinus lifting in dental implant procedures

Is this trial a fit for you?

A plain-English reading of the study's rules. Only the study team can confirm whether you qualify.

What this trial studies

This study evaluates the effectiveness of two techniques, the Densah bur and the Magnetic mallet, for performing transcrestal sinus lifting in patients with insufficient bone height in the maxillary region. The focus is on patients seeking dental implants to replace missing posterior teeth. By comparing these two methods, the study aims to determine which approach yields better outcomes for sinus lifting procedures. The study will include patients with a specific range of residual bone height and good overall health.

Why it matters

Who can join: the full rules

Inclusion Criteria:

* Patient seeking replacement of missing maxillary posterior teeth by dental implant procedure.
* Residual bone height is (5-7) mm measured from crestal bone to sinus floor.
* Both genders.
* Good general health;
* Good oral hygiene.

Exclusion Criteria:

* Uncontrolled Diabetes.
* Coagulation disorders.
* Immunological disorders.
* Previous radiation of the head and neck region.
* Presence of chronic systemic diseases;
* Presence of acute or chronic sinus problems;
* Alcohol or drug abuse;
* Heavy smokers.

Where it's running

• Alexandria Faculty of Dentistry
  Alexandria, Egypt Recruiting

Study contacts

• Study coordinator: Mohamed Abdelbaset, BDS
• Email: mohabdelbaset96@gmail.com
• Phone: 01017900706

Similar studies

Other studies for the same condition or treatment. Recruiting studies are listed first.

• Single vs. double stapling and purse-string techniques after rectal cancer surgery

  This trial tests whether using a single-stapling method to join the bowel after rectal cancer surgery results in fewer leaks compared with the double-stapling method.

  Recruiting Alexandria University · Alexandria · NCT07929415

• TAVI and PCI vs SAVR and CABG in low- and intermediate-risk patients with severe aortic stenosis and CAD

  This observational study compares TAVI plus PCI to SAVR plus CABG for patients who have both severe aortic stenosis and coronary artery disease.

  Recruiting Alexandria University · Alexandria, Alexandira · NCT07926022

• Primary anastomosis vs Bishop-Koop for neonatal jejunoileal atresia

  This study tests whether primary anastomosis or a Bishop-Koop procedure better supports recovery in newborns with jejunoileal atresia.

  Recruiting Alexandria University · Alexandria · NCT07925814

• AI-based psychiatric simulation to reduce stigma and boost readiness in nursing students

  A randomized trial will test whether an AI-powered simulation program helps fourth-year nursing students at Alexandria University think more positively about mental illness and feel more prepared to work in psychiatric care.

  Recruiting Alexandria University · Alexandria, Alexandria Governorate · NCT07896538

• Biomin fluoride varnish vs. Duraphat, with or without diode laser, for white spot lesions in primary teeth

  This trial tests whether Biomin fluoride varnish, alone or with diode laser, can better remineralize white spot lesions in young children than standard Duraphat varnish.

  Recruiting at 2 sites Alexandria University · Alexandria, Alexandria Governorate and 1 other locations · NCT07845110

• Intramuscular vs. Intravenous Tranexamic Acid in Total Hip Replacement

  This trial tests whether giving tranexamic acid by muscle injection works as well as the IV version to reduce blood loss in adults having a hip replacement.

  Recruiting Early Phase 1 Alexandria University · Alexandria · NCT07817537

How to take part

1. Review the eligibility criteria above with your treating physician.
2. Check the official listing on ClinicalTrials.gov for the latest contact details and recruitment status.
3. Contact the study coordinator or principal investigator to ask for pre-screening. Pre-screening is free and never obligates you to enroll.