Clinical trial No longer in our active list Phase 4 Interventional Ages 21 and up

Comparing spinal anesthesia and general anesthesia for patients with sepsis

Official title: Comparative Study Between Continuous Spinal Anesthesia Versus General Anesthesia in Patients With Sepsis

Run by Tanta University · NCT05897151 · Data updated 2026-05-14

This study is no longer in our active list. It may have stopped recruiting or finished. The details below are as of 2026-05-14 and are kept for reference. Check ClinicalTrials.gov for its current status, or see similar studies below.

This study tests whether using spinal anesthesia instead of general anesthesia can be safer and more effective for patients with sepsis during surgery.

Quick facts

PhasePhase 4
Study typeInterventional
Ages21 Years and up
SexAll
Enrollment110 (estimated)
SponsorTanta University
Academic / other
Locations1 site (Tanta, Elgharbia)
Trial IDNCT05897151 on ClinicalTrials.gov

Is this trial a fit for you?

Likely a good fit

Ideal candidates are adults over 21 years old with sepsis and a SOFA score of 7 or higher, who are hemodynamically stable and not on vasopressors.

Probably not a fit

Patients with known hypersensitivity to local anesthesia, septic shock, or severe spinal deformities may not benefit from this study.

A plain-English reading of the study's rules. Only the study team can confirm whether you qualify.

What this trial studies

This study evaluates the effectiveness and safety of continuous spinal anesthesia compared to general anesthesia in patients diagnosed with sepsis. It focuses on the challenges posed by hemodynamic instability in septic patients, who may experience increased risks of hypotension with conventional spinal anesthesia. By using a smaller dose of local anesthetic, the study aims to minimize hypotension while effectively managing anesthesia during surgical procedures. The trial will include patients who are hemodynamically stable and suitable for spinal anesthesia.

Why it matters

Potential benefit: If successful, this approach could lead to safer anesthesia practices for high-risk septic patients, potentially improving surgical outcomes.

How similar studies have gone: While there is limited data on this specific comparison, similar studies have explored the use of spinal anesthesia in high-risk patients, indicating potential benefits.

Who can join: the full rules

Show full inclusion / exclusion criteria
Inclusion Criteria:

* Patients over 21 years old
* American Society of Anesthesiologists (III, IV) diagnosed with sepsis (Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA) score ≥ 7)
* Hemodynamically stable and not on vasopressor due to lower limb pathology candidate for spinal anesthesia to drain source of infection.

Exclusion Criteria:

* Patients with known hypersensitivity to local anesthesia.
* Infection at the site of injection.
* Coagulopathy.
* Septic shock.
* Increase of intracranial pressure.
* Severe deformity of the spinal column.

Where it's running

  • Tanta University Hospitals
    Tanta, Elgharbia, Egypt
    Recruiting

Study contacts

Similar studies

Other studies for the same condition or treatment. Recruiting studies are listed first.

How to take part

  1. Review the eligibility criteria above with your treating physician.
  2. Check the official listing on ClinicalTrials.gov for the latest contact details and recruitment status.
  3. Contact the study coordinator or principal investigator to ask for pre-screening. Pre-screening is free and never obligates you to enroll.
Last reviewed 2026-11-14 by the Find a Trial editorial team. Information on this page is for educational purposes and is not medical advice. Always consult qualified healthcare professionals about clinical trial participation.