Clinical trial Recruiting at 1 site Phase 4 Interventional Ages 1 Year to 7

Comparing sedation methods for children's dental treatment

Official title: Sedation Versus Protective Stabilization for Dental Treatment of Children With Caries and Negative Behavior at the Dentist: a Non-randomized Clinical Trial

Run by Universidade Federal de Goias · NCT04119180 · Data updated 2026-11-12

This study is testing whether using medication or physical restraint is better for helping young children with dental anxiety get the dental care they need.

Quick facts

PhasePhase 4
Study typeInterventional
Ages1 Year to 7 Years
SexAll
Enrollment152 (estimated)
SponsorUniversidade Federal de Goias
Academic / other
Locations2 sites (Goiânia, Goiás and 1 other locations)
StatusRecruiting
StartedJanuary 30, 2020
Main results expectedFebruary 28, 2025
Study endsFebruary 28, 2026
Registry record updatedDecember 10, 2024
Trial IDNCT04119180 on ClinicalTrials.gov

Is this trial a fit for you?

Likely a good fit

Ideal candidates are children under 7 years old with dental caries and a history of non-cooperation during dental care.

Probably not a fit

Patients who exhibit positive behavior during dental examinations may not benefit from this study.

A plain-English reading of the study's rules. Only the study team can confirm whether you qualify.

What this trial studies

This clinical trial evaluates the effectiveness of moderate sedation versus protective stabilization in treating children with dental anxiety and behavior issues. It involves 152 children under 7 years old who require dental restoration due to cavities and have a history of non-cooperation. The study is conducted in outpatient clinics at the Federal University of Goiás and the University of São Paulo, with collaboration from King's College London. The interventions include the administration of ketamine and midazolam for sedation, compared to physical restraint methods.

Why it matters

Potential benefit: If successful, this study could improve dental treatment experiences for anxious children, leading to better oral health outcomes.

How similar studies have gone: Previous studies have explored sedation in pediatric dentistry, but this specific comparison of sedation versus stabilization is less common, making it a novel approach.

Who can join: the full rules

Show full inclusion / exclusion criteria
Inclusion Criteria:

* Children presenting cavities that need dental restoration
* ASA I (healthy) or II (mild and controlled systemic disease - persistent asthma, for example) children (ASA, 2015)
* Medical history without neurological or cognitive impairment
* Children who do not use medicines that may impair cognitive functions
* Children at low risk for airway obstruction (Mallampati less than 2 and / or tonsil hypertrophy occupying less than 50% of the oropharynx) (Mallampati et al., 1985)

Exclusion Criteria:

* Children with positive or definitely positive behavior (Frankl et al. 1962) in the dental examination session
* Non-attendance at the first intervention appointment after three scheduling attempts
* Chronic use of systemic corticosteroids

Where it's running

  • Dental School - FOUSP
    São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil
    Recruiting
  • Dental School - UFG
    Goiânia, Goiás, Brazil
    Active not recruiting

Study contacts

Similar studies

Other studies for the same condition or treatment. Recruiting studies are listed first.

How to take part

  1. Review the eligibility criteria above with your treating physician.
  2. Check the official listing on ClinicalTrials.gov for the latest contact details and recruitment status.
  3. Contact the study coordinator or principal investigator to ask for pre-screening. Pre-screening is free and never obligates you to enroll.
Last reviewed 2026-11-14 by the Find a Trial editorial team. Information on this page is for educational purposes and is not medical advice. Always consult qualified healthcare professionals about clinical trial participation.