Clinical trial Recruiting at 1 site Interventional Ages 20 to 45 Women only

Comparing IVF outcomes and embryo development between PPOS and GnRH antagonist protocols using time-lapse culture

Official title: IVF Outcomes With Time-Lapse Culture: Comparison Between PPOS and GnRH Antagonist Protocols

Run by Hanoi Medical University · NCT07409493 · Data updated 2026-11-12

This trial tests whether a fixed progestin-primed ovarian stimulation (PPOS) protocol produces similar numbers of mature eggs, good-quality embryos, and clinical outcomes — and whether embryo development patterns differ — compared with a GnRH antagonist protocol in women undergoing IVF with a planned freeze-all strategy.

Quick facts

Study typeInterventional
Ages20 Years to 45 Years
SexWomen only
Enrollment148 (estimated)
SponsorHanoi Medical University
Academic / other
Locations1 site (Hanoi)
StatusRecruiting
StartedJanuary 21, 2026
Main results expectedJune 2028
Study endsOctober 2028
Registry record updatedFebruary 13, 2026
Trial IDNCT07409493 on ClinicalTrials.gov

Is this trial a fit for you?

Likely a good fit

Women aged 20–45 who are indicated for IVF, plan a freeze-all embryo strategy, and are willing to be randomized and attend treatment at the study site are ideal candidates.

Probably not a fit

Patients using oocyte donation cycles, those needing a fresh embryo transfer, with recent hormonal treatment, or with significant systemic disease are unlikely to benefit from participation.

A plain-English reading of the study's rules. Only the study team can confirm whether you qualify.

What this trial studies

In this randomized interventional study, 148 women undergoing IVF with a planned freeze-all approach are allocated 1:1 to a fixed PPOS protocol or a GnRH antagonist protocol. Both groups receive controlled ovarian stimulation and oocyte retrieval, while resulting embryos are monitored with time-lapse imaging to capture morphokinetic parameters and derive KIDScore rankings. Primary comparisons include mature oocyte yield, number of good-quality embryos, clinical outcomes after transfer of frozen embryos, and differences in time-lapse morphokinetics between protocols. Statistical analyses will compare group-level outcomes to determine whether the PPOS approach yields comparable laboratory and clinical results and whether morphokinetic patterns differ.

Why it matters

Potential benefit: If successful, the study could offer patients a simpler or alternative stimulation option that yields similar IVF outcomes and improve embryo selection by clarifying morphokinetic differences.

How similar studies have gone: Previous clinical reports have often found PPOS yields comparable oocyte and pregnancy outcomes to antagonist protocols, but combining these comparisons with time-lapse morphokinetic and KIDScore analysis is a less-explored and relatively novel approach.

Who can join: the full rules

Show full inclusion / exclusion criteria
Inclusion Criteria:

* Women aged 20-45 years
* Indicated for in vitro fertilization (IVF) treatment
* Planned freeze-all embryo strategy
* Voluntary participation in research.

Exclusion Criteria:

* Systemic diseases
* Use of hormonal medications within 3 months prior to enrollment
* Oocyte donation cycles
* Unwilling or unable to participate in research

Where it's running

  • Hanoi Obstetrics and Gynecology Hospital
    Hanoi, Vietnam
    Recruiting

Study contacts

Similar studies

Other studies for the same condition or treatment. Recruiting studies are listed first.

How to take part

  1. Review the eligibility criteria above with your treating physician.
  2. Check the official listing on ClinicalTrials.gov for the latest contact details and recruitment status.
  3. Contact the study coordinator or principal investigator to ask for pre-screening. Pre-screening is free and never obligates you to enroll.
Last reviewed 2026-11-14 by the Find a Trial editorial team. Information on this page is for educational purposes and is not medical advice. Always consult qualified healthcare professionals about clinical trial participation.