Comparing cardioversion and ablation for persistent atrial fibrillation
Official title: Objective Randomised Blinded Investigation of Cardioversion Versus Ablation for Persistent Atrial Fibrillation (ORBICA-AF)
Run by Barts & The London NHS Trust · NCT06096246 · Data updated 2026-11-12
This study is testing whether a heart procedure called catheter ablation works better than a shock treatment to keep people with persistent atrial fibrillation from having their heart rhythm go out of sync again.
Quick facts
| Study type | Interventional |
|---|---|
| Ages | 18 Years to 85 Years |
| Sex | All |
| Enrollment | 208 (estimated) |
| Sponsor | Barts & The London NHS Trust Academic / other |
| Locations | 1 site (London) |
| Status | Recruiting |
| Started | July 26, 2024 |
| Main results expected | July 26, 2027 |
| Study ends | December 5, 2027 |
| Registry record updated | September 22, 2026 |
| Trial ID | NCT06096246 on ClinicalTrials.gov |
Is this trial a fit for you?
✓Likely a good fit
Ideal candidates are adults aged 18-85 with persistent atrial fibrillation lasting more than 7 days and less than 2 years.
✕Probably not a fit
Patients with severe renal impairment, uncontrolled hypertension, or contraindications for anticoagulation or catheter ablation may not benefit from this study.
A plain-English reading of the study's rules. Only the study team can confirm whether you qualify.
What this trial studies
This research investigates whether pulmonary vein isolation through catheter ablation leads to lower rates of atrial fibrillation (AF) recurrence compared to direct current (DC) cardioversion in patients with persistent AF. The study will involve a blinded, randomized trial design to compare the effectiveness of these two treatment strategies. Patients will be monitored for AF recurrence and other outcomes following their assigned treatment. The trial aims to provide clarity on the optimal first-line treatment for persistent AF, which has not been established in previous studies.
Why it matters
Potential benefit: If successful, this study could provide a more effective treatment option for patients with persistent atrial fibrillation, potentially reducing recurrence rates.
How similar studies have gone: This approach is novel as no previous blinded randomized controlled trials have compared early-ablation strategies to cardioversion-led strategies for persistent AF.
Who can join: the full rules
Show full inclusion / exclusion criteria
Inclusion Criteria: * Ability to give informed consent * Age 18-85 years * Persistent AF (atrial fibrillation lasting \> 7days) of total continuous duration \<2 years as documented in medical notes. * Patients being considered for cardioversion. Exclusion Criteria: * Creatinine clearance (eGFR) \< 30mls/min * Contraindication or unable to take anticoagulation * Uncontrolled hypertension * Contraindication for catheter ablation * BMI \> 40 * Patients in Persistent AF who have had more than one previous cardioversion. * Established diagnosis of Hypertrophic cardiomyopathy
Where it's running
-
Barts Heart Centre
London, United Kingdom Recruiting
Study contacts
- Principal investigator: Malcolm Finlay — Barts & The London NHS Trust
- Study coordinator: Malcolm Finlay, FRCP PhD
- Email: malcolm.finlay1@nhs.net
- Phone: 02037658635
Similar studies
Other studies for the same condition or treatment. Recruiting studies are listed first.
-
Chest-strap ECG wearable vs. traditional patch monitor in active adults
This study tests whether the Frontier X Plus chest-strap ECG device can capture heart rhythms as well as the MoMe ARC patch in active adults who already need an ambulatory monitor.
-
Non-invasive mapping to help treat ventricular tachycardia due to heart disease
This study tests a non-invasive mapping tool to guide VT ablation in adults with structural heart disease and prior heart attack.
-
BDNF Levels and Atrial Cardiomyopathy in People Having AF Ablation
This study tests whether circulating BDNF levels are linked to atrial cardiomyopathy in adults having their first ablation for persistent atrial fibrillation.
-
FARAFLEX Mapping and Pulsed Field Ablation for Atrial Fibrillation
This trial tests the FARAFLEX Mapping and PFA System to see if it can safely help adults with drug-refractory paroxysmal or persistent atrial fibrillation.
-
Pulsed field ablation for atrial fibrillation in underrepresented minority patients
This registry will test how well Boston Scientific pulsed field ablation works and how safe it is for Black, Hispanic, Asian, and other underrepresented adults with paroxysmal or persistent atrial fibrillation.
-
Left Atrial Appendage Occlusion and Rhythm Restoration in AF Patients
This trial tests a combined procedure using the Volt PFA System and Amulet 2 to see if it safely and feasibly treats atrial fibrillation while also closing the left atrial appendage in adults with AF.
How to take part
- Review the eligibility criteria above with your treating physician.
- Check the official listing on ClinicalTrials.gov for the latest contact details and recruitment status.
- Contact the study coordinator or principal investigator to ask for pre-screening. Pre-screening is free and never obligates you to enroll.