Chronic Evaluation of a New Pacemaker System
Official title: Chronic Evaluation of Novel Pacemaker System
Run by Calyan Technologies · NCT06056817 · Data updated 2026-11-12
This study tests a new single‑chamber pacemaker called Calyan to see if it is safe and may work for adults with bradycardia who need ventricular pacing.
Quick facts
| Study type | Interventional |
|---|---|
| Ages | 18 Years and up |
| Sex | All |
| Enrollment | 10 (estimated) |
| Sponsor | Calyan Technologies Industry-sponsored |
| Locations | 1 site (Minneapolis, Minnesota) |
| Status | Recruiting |
| Started | July 1, 2026 |
| Main results expected | September 30, 2027 |
| Study ends | December 31, 2027 |
| Registry record updated | September 1, 2026 |
| Trial ID | NCT06056817 on ClinicalTrials.gov |
Is this trial a fit for you?
✓Likely a good fit
Adults 18 years or older with a class I or IIa indication for single‑chamber ventricular pacing and a life expectancy of at least one year, who can provide informed consent.
✕Probably not a fit
Patients with complete AV block, those who are pacemaker‑dependent, or individuals with contraindicating mediastinal anatomy or prior surgeries as listed may not benefit from this device.
A plain-English reading of the study's rules. Only the study team can confirm whether you qualify.
What this trial studies
This early feasibility study will implant the Calyan pacemaker to assess its initial safety, device function, and stability over a 3‑month primary follow-up, with extended monitoring afterward. If acute success is achieved, chronic pacing will be delivered during the defined follow-up, and data will support planning for a larger pivotal trial. The study aims to determine whether the Calyan system can provide effective pacing in eligible adults and identify any early safety concerns. Enrollment requires informed consent and a single‑chamber ventricular pacemaker indication per ACC/AHA/HRS guidelines, with several exclusions to avoid high‑risk anatomical or prior surgical conditions. The trial is sponsored by Calyan Technologies and conducted at the University of Minnesota.
Why it matters
Potential benefit: If successful, the Calyan pacemaker could offer a safe and effective option for ventricular pacing in eligible patients, potentially improving symptom control and quality of life.
How similar studies have gone: As an early feasibility study, data from similar initial trials in novel pacemaker systems have shown safety signals and potential effectiveness to justify larger pivotal studies.
Who can join: the full rules
Show full inclusion / exclusion criteria
Inclusion Criteria: 1. Age 18 or above 2. Willing and capable of providing informed consent 3. Class I or IIa indication for implantation of a single-chamber ventricular pacemaker, according to ACC/AHA/HRS guidelines 4. A life expectancy of at least one year, and is a suitable candidate based on overall health and well-being Exclusion Criteria: 1. Patients with complete AV block or other pacemaker-dependent conditions 2. Patients in whom a substernal device implant should be avoided: 1. Any prior sternotomy; 2. Any prior medical condition or procedure that leads to adhesions in the anterior mediastinal space; 3. Any marked sternal abnormality, such as pectus excavatum or pectus carinatum 4. Prior abdominal surgery in the epigastric region 5. Planned sternotomy 6. Prior or planned chest radiotherapy 7. Hiatal hernia that distorts mediastinal anatomy 8. Adhesions in the anterior mediastinal space 9. Severe obesity so that subxiphoid/substernal tunneling cannot be safely performed 3. Patients with severe RV dilation, gross hepatosplenomegaly, or severe obesity such that subxiphoidal/substernal tunneling cannot be safely performed 4. Patients with a class III indication for a permanent pacemaker 5. Patients with decompensated heart failure not due to bradycardia and expected to worsen with chronic RV pacing 6. Patients with an implanted cardiac pacemaker, cardioverter defibrillator, cardiac resynchronization device, or neurostimulator device, or planned implantation of a cardioverter defibrillator, cardiac resynchronization device, or neurostimulator device 7. Patients with a current or planned implantation of a substernal device, or any implanted device that would interfere with the implantation or operation of a substernal device 8. Patients who have previously undergone an open-heart surgical procedure. 9. Patients with an active infection 10. Patient on chronic oral anticoagulation which cannot be temporarily discontinued for surgery 11. Patients with a condition in which pericardial pacing would be difficult or impossible, such as acute pericarditis, chronic pericardial effusion or pericardial thickening or calcification, cardiac tamponade, or chronic restrictive pericarditis 12. Patients who have tested positive for the COVID-19 in the past 3 months, or are currently showing symptoms consistent with COVID-19 13. Women of childbearing potential who are or might be pregnant at the time of the study or breastfeeding 14. Subjects with a life expectancy of less than 12 months 15. Patients who are currently enrolled or planning to participate in any concurrent clinical study with an investigational therapy 16. Patients with decompensated heart failure expected to worsen with chronic RV pacing 17. Patients with COPD with oxygen dependence
Where it's running
-
University of Minnesota
Minneapolis, Minnesota, United States Recruiting
Study contacts
- Study coordinator: Imad Libbus, PhD
- Email: imad@calyantech.com
- Phone: 763-657-1480
Similar studies
Other studies for the same condition or treatment. Recruiting studies are listed first.
-
SPIKE FLOW endocardial pacing lead safety and performance study
This study tests whether the SPIKE FLOW temporary endocardial pacing lead is safe and effective in adults needing temporary pacing during heart-related conditions.
-
Factors Linked to Slow Heart Rate After Pulsed Field Ablation for Atrial Fibrillation
This study looks for factors that might cause bradycardia during the hospital stay after AF ablation using pulsed field technology.
-
Transjugular implantation of a leadless pacemaker (Aveir VR) for ventricular pacing
This study tests whether placing an Aveir VR leadless pacemaker through the neck vein can safely provide ventricular pacing in adults with bradycardia.
-
Conduction System Pacing Display Research During LBBAP Implant
Researchers are testing a CSP Display System during left bundle branch area pacing pacemaker implant to see if it accurately shows heart signals compared with a standard ECG.
-
Focal Cryoablation vs. Radiofrequency Cardioneuroablation for Bradyarrhythmias
This study tests whether focal cryoablation can treat vagally driven slow heart rhythms as well as traditional radiofrequency ablation in adults with bradycardia or related syncope.
-
Personalized pacing rate to see if higher lower rate helps heart and brain flow
In hypertensive patients with bradycardia who need a dual-chamber pacemaker, the study tests whether setting a higher, personalized pacing rate improves heart function and brain blood flow compared with the standard 60 bpm.
How to take part
- Review the eligibility criteria above with your treating physician.
- Check the official listing on ClinicalTrials.gov for the latest contact details and recruitment status.
- Contact the study coordinator or principal investigator to ask for pre-screening. Pre-screening is free and never obligates you to enroll.