Autogenic Inhibition vs Reciprocal Inhibition in Lower Crossed Syndrome
Official title: Comparative Effects of Autogenic Inhibition vs Reciprocal Inhibition in Patients With Lower Cross Syndrome
Run by Foundation University Islamabad · NCT07838558 · Data updated 2026-11-12
This study tests whether two Muscle Energy Technique approaches work differently for people with Lower Crossed Syndrome.
Quick facts
| Study type | Interventional |
|---|---|
| Ages | 19 Years to 35 Years |
| Sex | All |
| Enrollment | 46 (estimated) |
| Sponsor | Foundation University Islamabad Academic / other |
| Locations | 1 site (Islamabad, Punjab Province) |
| Status | Recruiting |
| Started | February 12, 2026 |
| Main results expected | December 18, 2026 |
| Study ends | January 18, 2027 |
| Registry record updated | September 24, 2026 |
| Trial ID | NCT07838558 on ClinicalTrials.gov |
Is this trial a fit for you?
✓Likely a good fit
Adults aged 19–35 with a clinical diagnosis of Lower Crossed Syndrome confirmed by at least three positive tests.
✕Probably not a fit
Individuals outside the specified age range or without the defined LCS criteria may not benefit from this intervention.
A plain-English reading of the study's rules. Only the study team can confirm whether you qualify.
What this trial studies
This randomized trial compares Autogenic Inhibition MET with Reciprocal Inhibition MET in adults with Lower Crossed Syndrome. Both groups receive six weeks of therapy (18 sessions total) plus a standardized set of core strengthening exercises. Each session begins with a lumbar hot pack, followed by the assigned MET targetting the iliopsoas, rectus femoris, and erector spinae, with 20-30% maximal isometric contractions and 30-second stretches. Outcomes will be assessed to see which technique more effectively improves muscle balance and functional measures related to posture and pain. The trial is conducted at Foundation University College of Physical Therapy in Islamabad, with flexible inclusion for adults aged 19–35 and specific clinical criteria for LCS.
Why it matters
Potential benefit: If successful, participants may experience improved posture, reduced posture-related pain, and better functional balance.
How similar studies have gone: Prior research has shown potential benefits of MET approaches for muscle balance, but direct comparisons in LCS are limited.
Who can join: the full rules
Show full inclusion / exclusion criteria
Inclusion Criteria * Age 19-35 years. * Both genders will include in this study. * According to Janda's Approach, Clinical diagnosis of LCS based on ≥3 positive clinical tests. * Patient with positive modified Thomas test, Patients with a positive testing of prone hip extension test, Patients with a positive test of trunk flexion test, Patients with tight erector spinae muscles. * Participants with no lumbar pain to moderate lumbar pain (NPRS0-6) will be included. * Painless movement and activity. * Pain only produced by sustained loading in relevant position, which is then relieved after maintaining a corrected posture for 5 minutes, indicating posture-related pain. Exclusion Criteria * Leg symptoms when walking, eased in flexion (Signs of stenosis) * Pain due to repetitive movement * Lumbar Radiculopathy * Neurological Symptoms (Paresthesia/numbness) * Structural deformity (Kyphosis, lordosis, scoliosis, spondylosis, spondylolysis, spondylolisthesis)
Where it's running
-
Foundation University College of Physical Therapy
Islamabad, Punjab Province, Pakistan Recruiting
Study contacts
- Study coordinator: Momna Khadim, DPT
- Email: momnakhadim117@gmail.com
- Phone: 03321569497
Similar studies
Other studies for the same condition or treatment. Recruiting studies are listed first.
-
Autogenic inhibition versus reciprocal inhibition for lower cross syndrome
This trial tests whether autogenic inhibition or reciprocal inhibition techniques better reduce pain and improve function in adults aged 25–50 with lower cross syndrome.
-
Post-Isometric Relaxation and Myofascial Release for Low Back Pain with Lower Cross Syndrome
This trial tests whether combining post-isometric relaxation with myofascial release helps reduce pain and improve flexibility and function for adults with low back pain and lower cross syndrome.
-
Comparing Jandas Approach and PNF Technique for Lower Cross Syndrome
This study is testing which physical therapy method, Jandas Approach or PNF, works better for helping people with Lower Cross Syndrome feel less pain and improve their movement and quality of life.
-
Effects of lumbar mobilization techniques on lower cross syndrome
This study is testing if a specific back treatment can help people with lower cross syndrome feel less pain and move better.
-
Kendall exercises with and without positional release therapy for upper crossed syndrome
This study tests Kendall exercises with and without positional release therapy to see if they reduce neck and shoulder pain and improve posture in adults with upper crossed syndrome.
-
Breathing and manual therapy to improve function in college students with upper cross syndrome
In college students with upper cross syndrome, adding a specific breathing technique (ujjayi pranayama) to manual therapy is being tested to see if it helps spinal alignment relate to better functional performance.
How to take part
- Review the eligibility criteria above with your treating physician.
- Check the official listing on ClinicalTrials.gov for the latest contact details and recruitment status.
- Contact the study coordinator or principal investigator to ask for pre-screening. Pre-screening is free and never obligates you to enroll.